"angry" gamers/critics

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
But as long as he rips on the current US president, all is forgiven.

That's literally like, all liberals/SJW cucks. "Lol mexicans so smelly HOLA AMIGOS...But fuck Trump anyhow."

Nigga you're pretty much in the same field as him in regards to racism. At least he doesn't hide under a two-faced mask of "progressive".
 
Last edited:
I swear Is top list all that strider doses?
He does some other videos on his sub channel LiveStrider, but as far as his main channel goes ... yeah it's pretty much all he does. He's pretty much a one man's Watchmojo, except he doesn't fart out 10 videos a day, yet still somehow manages to make them worse than WM's top 10s.
 
He's probably trying to emulate those voice actor readings you see at conventions, where prominent voice actors will voice their characters while reading different scripts. One time, I saw Jim Cummings read Darth Vader's lines from A New Hope while voicing Winnie the Pooh.

More delusions of grandeur, then.
 
He's probably trying to emulate those voice actor readings you see at conventions, where prominent voice actors will voice their characters while reading different scripts. One time, I saw Jim Cummings read Darth Vader's lines from A New Hope while voicing Winnie the Pooh.

The difference being, it's amusing when the actual voice actors themselves do it compared to Doug's attempt at mimicking them.
 
Doug's probably dragging his feet on that one. Which both surprises me, and doesn't surprise me at the same time.
 
I don't get angry critics/reviewers. For one, they're reviewing things that either aren't meant for them or they should have outgrown years ago (though, there are some kids' cartoons out there that can be enjoyed by adults due to the more adult jokes being more readily understood, like Animaniacs and Rocko's Modern Life). For all their talk about studios ruining childhoods, they seem to do it quicker by nitpicking stuff that would go over kids' heads anyway and most parents would dismiss as harmless entertainment. For another, it's never intellectual or even interesting, just squawking about why this TV show/movie/book/comic is bad and shouldn't be watched (and that's another thing: are these angry critics/reviewers so narcissistic that they think everyone has their mindset?). No look at as to "Why?" or even a brief history behind the scenes of its creation, buried by stupid jokes and catchphrases or, in the case of MysteriousMrEnter, a dour attitude and a lot of severe mental/emotional issues. It's all so tedious.

I prefer to read a review like this than watch something like this. Then again, that's probably all just me and I'm considered "too old" to "enjoy" something like this. To that I'd say, "Good."

Oh, and here's another angry reviewer/critic you should be picking apart: Troy Steele from http://www.bloggerbeware.com/. He's the MysteriousMrEnter of Goosebumps books (Goosebumps being those 1990s kids' horror books written by R.L. Stine) and his trigger book (the book that makes him go into a frothing rage) is Chicken, Chicken, number #52 of the original Goosebumps series about two farm kids who turn into chickens after being cursed by a witch.

Nerds are very poor at the whole "vote with your wallet" concept.
That's why it's so easy to make money off them.
 
Back
Top Bottom