Amber's finances - assumptions galore

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
A video about Amber's demonetazation, not many new findings though, more like a summary of what the kiwis have discussed here , but for those who do not want to give ALR the views on her channel to test things out themselves the changes are demonstrated in this video.

 
It would kill for a reference over a few members including myself's work but kiwi farms proving we do the legwork. I think its safe to say she is demonetised heavily at this point I have gone back every few days as of friday about 4 attempts and its the same frequency of ads. I wanted to check if it was a glitch or not but it appears not to be. She must be appealing some though because some that were before are monetised but some are not that were.
 
escándalo said:
It would kill for a reference over a few members including myself's work but kiwi farms proving we do the legwork. I think its safe to say she is demonetised heavily at this point I have gone back every few days as of friday about 4 attempts and its the same frequency of ads. I wanted to check if it was a glitch or not but it appears not to be. She must be appealing some though because some that were before are monetised but some are not that were.
Click to expand...
For you Escandalo, I'm testing something.

I've never watched one of her videos so I opened up Microsoft Edge, where I'm not signed in (I have Premium so no ads) and don't have an ad blocker. There were two ads at the start, one was 5 seconds, the second I was able to skip. Now I'm listening to this boring beanbag blathering on about nothing and waiting for ads. God bless the reactors who edit out her more boring aspects.

Ugh, she looks like such a dirty bitch with her overly huge lashes.

4:00 - one skippable ad
There's an annoying ad block banner ad
8:03 - a 15 second unskippable ad
10:02 - 2 ads - one is 5 seconds, another is 15 seconds but skippable
Jesus Christ, she's so dumb and boring. And her following Becky around while cooking is making me nauseous, get a tripod!!!!
15:10 - 2 ads - one is 5 seconds, second is longer but skippable
Jesus, this is garbage content. They can't even go through a carwash properly.
End of the video - one skippable ad.

I don't know what any of that means but this is from a laptap not logged into youtube, no adblock and never have watched one of her videos.
 
SnarlieNarlie said:
A video about Amber's demonetazation, not many new findings though, more like a summary of what the kiwis have discussed here , but for those who do not want to give ALR the views on her channel to test things out themselves the changes are demonstrated in this video.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=9ahJYgjXGEY
Click to expand...
Oh, so that’s what all the hullabaloo is about.
It’s good they aren’t paying her to die a slow death. Now she will HAVE to be a productive member of society 😂 or get SSI, I guess.
Edit, from personal experience, I’m aware it’s hella hard to get SSI, sometimes you have to get a lawyer who knows the rules, but hey, she just might have the funds to do that....and she can claim cancer, morbid obesity, and mental illness. It might not be too hard for her....🤨
 
Turd Fergusson said:
Disability is especially difficult in Kentucky because of the amount of fraud in the past. I suspect that your case for disability has to be incredibly strong to be successful. Her case for SSI and SNAP is better, but to be successful she would have to remove her YT channel, thus having no income from YT. However, she would not be able to stay in her flat and eat the massive amount of food she usually does. Having no income would mean that Becky would be gone too.
Her only hope might be to move to Oklahoma and staying with her mother.
Click to expand...
Couldn't they just take the tard thumb to court or hearing or whatever the venue, and successfully establish a case of learning disability or mental delay? They could ask Becky a few basic common knowledge questions or she could try to tie her shoelaces in front of them
 
Floating a theory, I've noticed so many youtubers getting demonitized, trying to add in other forms of income, Patreon, merch, etc. Other youtubers I follow have gone from 7+ midrolls in a 20 min video, to fuck all. They've said their adsense has fallen off a cliff, but won't elaborate when asked. I suspect a platform wide cull on spamming viewers with ads.
If so, our gorl is fucked, and won't upload again, I think. If she's hit with a 60 or 70% pay cut, she wouldn't upload, out of spite. She already clearly hates filming, editing and uploading, and that's with better pay than a lot of us will ever get. She doesn't even attempt to veil her contempt for her audience.
escándalo said:
It would kill for a reference over a few members including myself's work but kiwi farms proving we do the legwork. I think its safe to say she is demonetised heavily at this point I have gone back every few days as of friday about 4 attempts and its the same frequency of ads. I wanted to check if it was a glitch or not but it appears not to be. She must be appealing some though because some that were before are monetised but some are not that were.
Click to expand...
I picked a random video, on the default browser I don't use, and didn't sign into YouTube. I tried to stay away from weight/health related videos, in case she's been hit with the 'no glorifying ED' YouTube rule type thing.
I picked grwm | answering questions... from 19 August 2019.
Initially no opening ads, refreshed in error, One 5 sec opening ad, no yellow ad markers.
5:50 she's scared about using a different eyeliner. For fucks sake..
Not one more ad.
Update, 31 May 2020
One 15 sec opening ad, no yellow ad markers.
Fuck it's cancer update, so could fall foul of yt because of that.
No other ads.
Dollar tree haul 29 Jun 2020
No opening ads, no yellow ad markers.
No other ads.
Edited can't spell
 
Last edited:
Well I did my part and only got one ad throughout 5 videos. It was skippable and right at the beginning. No yellow markers at all. Also no banner ads but I’m on mobile, maybe those only pop up on desktop?
 
I mentioned this before, but Peter Monn is notorious for cramming a shit load of ads into a 20-30 minute video. YouTube is also notorious for letting him do it because he has a very consistent and loyal audience. He’s a gay, non threatening, middle aged man who does gossip videos. He loves to be on camera and he’s sassy, so wine moms and middle aged women who had one gay friend in college eat his content up.

If the theory about youtube taking Adsense from people who put in too many ads was true, he’d be one of the people who would lose them, at least I would think he would be. He uploaded a half hour video today and including the beginning and ending ad, there are 11 yellow ticks on his video, and the banner ad.

I got:

-an advertisement for UGG, skippable
-Snapchat, skippable
-some app called Nourish, skippable
-third tick didn’t load
-vitamins
-senate leadership fund, skippable
-no ad
-another vitamin ad
-no ad
-no ending ads

the video was 37 minutes and 55 seconds long. I’d say this is less than what used to pop up, but it hasn’t been cut in half considering he got 6/11 ads. I will say though, this is par for the course since the beginning of this year. Last year, every single ad came up and I quite watching him because I couldn’t handle an ad literally every 2 minutes. Now it’s more like an ad every 4 minutes, which is still pretty bad IMO. But yeah, I’d say people are losing Adsense, but it’s definitely not specific to the fatties and it’s nothing new since March. I think that’s when it really happened.

I stand by my theory that people thought Amber got demonetized because they kept going back to the same video over and over to read comments and they got a different amount of ads every time. I don’t think anything special has happened recently. She still has 7 ads on her last video and they all came up for me. Looking at it on my boyfriend’s phone, she had 6. On par with Peter Monn, despite exploiting an eating disorder and clickbaiting. I truly don’t think youtube gives a fuck and the whole less ads issue really came down to corona. People have been complaining about it for months.

edit: can’t speak English apparently
 
mythical mother said:
I mentioned this before, but Peter Monn is notorious for cramming a shit load of ads into a 20-30 minute video. YouTube is also notorious for letting him do it because he has a very consistent and loyal audience. He’s a gay, non threatening, middle aged man who does gossip videos. He loves to be on camera and he’s sassy, so wine moms and middle aged women who had one gay friend in college eat his content up.

If the theory about youtube taking Adsense from people who put in too many ads was true, he’d be one of the people who would lose them, at least I would think he would be. He uploaded a half hour video today and including the beginning and ending ad, there are 11 yellow ticks on his video, and the banner ad.

I got:

-an advertisement for UGG, skippable
-Snapchat, skippable
-some app called Nourish, skippable
-third tick didn’t load
-vitamins
-senate leadership fund, skippable
-no ad
-another vitamin ad
-no ad
-no ending ads

the video was 37 minutes and 55 seconds long. I’d say this is less than what used to pop up, but it hasn’t been cut in half considering he got 6/11 ads. I will say though, this is par for the course since the beginning of this year. Last year, every single ad came up and I quite watching him because I couldn’t handle an ad literally every 2 minutes. Now it’s more like an ad every 4 minutes, which is still pretty bad IMO. But yeah, I’d say people are losing Adsense, but it’s definitely not specific to the fatties and it’s nothing new since March. I think that’s when it really happened.

I stand by my theory that people thought Amber got demonetized because they kept going back to the same video over and over to read comments and they got a different amount of ads every time. I don’t think anything special has happened recently. She still has 7 ads on her last video and they all came up for me. Looking at it on my boyfriend’s phone, she had 6. On par with Peter Monn, despite exploiting an eating disorder and clickbaiting. I truly don’t think youtube gives a fuck and the whole less ads issue really came down to corona. People have been complaining about it for months.

edit: can’t speak English apparentl
Click to expand...
Just for the heck of it, I tried a few Peter Monn videos.
Trisha Paytas comes for James Charles, he claps back, yesterday, 26 mins.
Double skippable opening ads, (Etoro pfft like I've 2 cents to my name, never mind invest).
4 yellow markers, not one triggered an ad.
No ads the whole video.
Are Shane and Tati ever coming back, 1 week ago, 26 mins.
Double skippable opening ads, holy fuck, 10 yellow markers. I see what you're talking about.
Second yellow marker triggered another double, skippable ad.
No other ads triggered, the whole video.

Maybe this is a geographical anomaly? I'm in Europe, possibly there isn't the same market for advertisers here, not as lucrative, or popular to advertise on YouTube?
The last two weeks is the first time I've ever seen yellow markers not trigger an ad.
I know advertisers have paused or halted campaigns during covid, so no bidding wars for ad space, driving the price per ad down, and with it youtubers CPM.
I'm convinced Amber got slapped with a warning for trying to take too much out of the pot, ad wise, as another poster said.
Even at reduced paycheck, surely she will actually have start uploading again? Thumby wouldn't work in a fit, and those shite Wommart hauls don't pay for themselves.
 
See I am thinking it is geographical too as I am in Europe too, my friend in the US triggered banner ads and I used a VPN and did so. however with Amber's on the US VPN side skipped ads even on Amber's side. I know Amber's Nightmares had the same situation too.

My theory is; these yellow markers are ad indicators WHICH AMBER PUT IN however due to her demonetised status or the video in review has been deemed so has shaved off that ad. I am leaning in her being almost fully or in the process the problem is she has gone unnoticed by youtube and so has just got her paycheck. When you keep flagging videos for investigation it gets people investigating not bots and if they deem you unworthy of ads they effectively shadow ban you. I feel she is skirting this territory as Youtube an admin will at one point just be "why is she wasting time this is basically feeder content or edging it" then because of it being repeated behaviour and it not changing they flip the switch.

To add on to my theory and speculation I believe this video was an insight;

I believe she got an email about the change in guidelines and she was like oh shit need to change up or no food money.
"I need to stop the mukbongs the sit downs about my mental health."

She is on 2 strikes now she was struck probably for a past video.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
escándalo said:
....

I believe she got an email about the change in guidelines and she was like oh shit need to change up or no food money.
"I need to stop the mukbongs the sit downs about my mental health."

She is on 2 strikes now she was struck probably for a past video.
Click to expand...

That's a pretty good point! Everyone thought it is just a new cycle, she is frustrated by her views going down although she was living the big city life and en plus, she was gaining all her weight back - time for cycle phase 1 by "rebranding" her channel to the same old stuff just for the sake of pretending a fresh new start.

Whereas it was probably more of an attempt to signal towards Youtube admins something like " ok ok you guuuuuise get off my back I want to keep my shekels, I do not give af about my viewers, they are dispectful turds but I give af about the mighty god of youtube shekels so I do as you please".

Also the change back to her old channel name may be just another attempt to kind of "reset" the youtube algorithm hoping to get her off Youtube's watch list.

She is indeed between a rock and a hard place as viewers are getting even more frustrated because Trainwrecklynn without the trainwreck is not worth the time. Soon this whole forum section will die out if things continue like that. If there is nothing to talk and speculate about at kiwifarms you can bet Cuntylynn is on the edge of falling into the abyss of irrelevancy.
 
escándalo said:
See I am thinking it is geographical too as I am in Europe too, my friend in the US triggered banner ads and I used a VPN and did so. however with Amber's on the US VPN side skipped ads even on Amber's side. I know Amber's Nightmares had the same situation too.

My theory is; these yellow markers are ad indicators WHICH AMBER PUT IN however due to her demonetised status or the video in review has been deemed so has shaved off that ad. I am leaning in her being almost fully or in the process the problem is she has gone unnoticed by youtube and so has just got her paycheck. When you keep flagging videos for investigation it gets people investigating not bots and if they deem you unworthy of ads they effectively shadow ban you. I feel she is skirting this territory as Youtube an admin will at one point just be "why is she wasting time this is basically feeder content or edging it" then because of it being repeated behaviour and it not changing they flip the switch.

To add on to my theory and speculation I believe this video was an insight;

I believe she got an email about the change in guidelines and she was like oh shit need to change up or no food money.
"I need to stop the mukbongs the sit downs about my mental health."

She is on 2 strikes now she was struck probably for a past video.
Click to expand...
Idk man. I just clicked 6 of her videos and got banner ads on 4. I’ve been going through her videos on devices around my house since this debate happened and I still get about the same rate of ads Peter Monn gets and she puts in about the same amount of ads he puts in. I personally think it was site wide.

Nobody is talking about it happening to anyone else because nobody hates Peter Monn the way people hate Amber, for example. We’re not going back to his videos a bunch of times to read hate comments, I’m sure that virtually none of his fan base wants him to get demonetized so they’re not combing his videos like we just did and noting the differences. I’m just saying, with all the youtubers that have taken up other hustles this year, and all the complaints I’ve heard about Adsense, it didn’t happen to amber because of a strike. It happened to everyone but the difference with her is that she’s too lazy and stupid to do anything besides the dirt floor bare minimum with is recording videos with barely any editing and putting them on YouTube.

So yeah, of course site wide changes are going to effect the least ambitious s people the most. People like Peter Monn have other sources of income. I know he has like 7 channels now, his husband works, he sells candles and cameos and im pretty sure he’s also said they’re invested in real estate. They’re not worried about ads. Amber has nothing. She’s possibly one of a handful of financially illiterate people that are worried about ads.

Honestly, there’s so many experiences and opinions in just this one thread that it looks like we will never know unless someone gets into her account and sees it for themself.
 
Last edited:
phoenixrrt762 said:
Oh, so that’s what all the hullabaloo is about.
It’s good they aren’t paying her to die a slow death. Now she will HAVE to be a productive member of society 😂 or get SSI, I guess.
Edit, from personal experience, I’m aware it’s hella hard to get SSI, sometimes you have to get a lawyer who knows the rules, but hey, she just might have the funds to do that....and she can claim cancer, morbid obesity, and mental illness. It might not be too hard for her....🤨
Click to expand...
So lawyers who work SSI cases actually dont cost upfront. They are paid in what the client gets approved for from the start of the disability. And the amount they can get paid is capped so if Amber ever needed to start working a case for it she wouldn't even need to come out of pocket.
 
funtimesrun56 said:
So lawyers who work SSI cases actually dont cost upfront. They are paid in what the client gets approved for from the start of the disability. And the amount they can get paid is capped so if Amber ever needed to start working a case for it she wouldn't even need to come out of pocket.
Click to expand...
Which is ridiculous considering SSI is less than $800 a month. It would be funny to see Amber living off that. Not funny to see other people struggle tho.
 
mythical mother said:
Which is ridiculous considering SSI is less than $800 a month. It would be funny to see Amber living off that. Not funny to see other people struggle tho.
Click to expand...
I agree that going towards government benefits is not what Amber wants. It will be her last option.

One question we may ask is why did Amber did not grow her channel earlier? If we go back in time, when she started her channel, she probably did not make much money until about a couple of years ago. By this time, she was living in Monticello for not much and her income was enough for Becky and herself to do whatever they wanted. Not being able to travel and having no house and only a used car, thus very little expenses, they could spend most of her income on food and consumer products. There was no need for her to grow her channel since, with some months making over $10k, there was no reason for it. Compounding this is her total lack of financial acumen, poor education, and her lack of planning for the future.

Then 2020 happened. She got cancer and probably did not feel like doing more on her channel. Now, with a reduction of her income from partial demonization, she is in a tough spot and I feel she does not know what to do. It would be difficult for her to create a Patreon since her channel is really not marketable. She has been so toxic that no one would want to do collaboration with her. Becky should apply, if she has not done it already, for government benefits. If she can, she should try to reduce her expenses by moving in something cheaper, returning or selling her $6k bed, cooking at home and reducing consumer purchases. Will she? Probably not. Acting as nothing happened is not going to help to change the situation. She will need to be more creative on her channel and find a part-time job that she can do at home. Staying off YT is not a solution for her.
 
SnarlieNarlie said:
That's a pretty good point! Everyone thought it is just a new cycle, she is frustrated by her views going down although she was living the big city life and en plus, she was gaining all her weight back - time for cycle phase 1 by "rebranding" her channel to the same old stuff just for the sake of pretending a fresh new start.

Whereas it was probably more of an attempt to signal towards Youtube admins something like " ok ok you guuuuuise get off my back I want to keep my shekels, I do not give af about my viewers, they are dispectful turds but I give af about the mighty god of youtube shekels so I do as you please".

Also the change back to her old channel name may be just another attempt to kind of "reset" the youtube algorithm hoping to get her off Youtube's watch list.

She is indeed between a rock and a hard place as viewers are getting even more frustrated because Trainwrecklynn without the trainwreck is not worth the time. Soon this whole forum section will die out if things continue like that. If there is nothing to talk and speculate about at kiwifarms you can bet Cuntylynn is on the edge of falling into the abyss of irrelevancy.
Click to expand...

If all of this is true it's funny just a month ago she made a video saying "she can spend her money any way she wants, it's her money" because people tried to warn her youtube won't last forever. So if she did get any strikes it must have been after that because all this month she wasn't worried about spending money on Halloween decorations they will just throw out .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom