- Joined
- Feb 6, 2021
Faxx is doing everything correct legally. Posting e-mails is a no-no and would look tacky from a judge's verdict so is dealing with it professionally. They give a single statement, which is good PR-wise, stating facts but also doubling as a warning to Amber. If Faxx continues to get immorally struck Youtube has a parameter that ignores the report, you can still do it but the automation system puts it so far down on priorities it is practically immune.
AF is doing everything correct what you should do and appears to have consulted someone because this is very by the books. They probably know someone in the field either way Amber better stay back.
Amber striking channels ironically would on the algorithm make her channel in danger as machine learning wise it would make the machine more responsive to reports. Amber's channel has been a series of playing the algorithm for years but it can die by it too. Machines are impartial but also so are most lawyers, especially copyright ones. Amber is playing a really retarded game, which she would not win.
AF is doing everything correct what you should do and appears to have consulted someone because this is very by the books. They probably know someone in the field either way Amber better stay back.
Amber striking channels ironically would on the algorithm make her channel in danger as machine learning wise it would make the machine more responsive to reports. Amber's channel has been a series of playing the algorithm for years but it can die by it too. Machines are impartial but also so are most lawyers, especially copyright ones. Amber is playing a really retarded game, which she would not win.