7/23 Court Date

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
RagtimeRoastBeefy said:
I thought that was the dang dirty goal
Click to expand...

It was, you Dang Dirty Doll.

flossman said:
Mace.
Click to expand...

Let's do this the old fashioned way:

DF-483.JPG
 
So inner circle is still 'editing' the video? They seem to be Chris' most effective white knights nowadays.
 
Twaughthammer said:
First of all, I don't think many of us have or display any real hatred towards Chris; infact outright detractors are called out as :alog: and a lot of the posts have been of a "good for him/her" nature when he's gone out and done people things.

There was hatred once, perhaps, when he was new to us and going on about da homos and niggos and routinely wishing people dead... i.e. spouting things that are completely unacceptable (and about those paying into his tugboat while he played vidya all day). How else were we meant to react? That would cause annoyance and rightly so. That said, 'hate', 'hatred' and 'haters' are terms routinely used by professional moaners to discredit any opposition without answering the argument, so...

I don't get this bullshit assertion that all Chris' troubles started in 2007. This cherrypicker needs to lurk moar; I'm not saying Chris deserved everything that happened but he was more than primed for it beforehand. They might as well have painted a bullseye on him.
Click to expand...

I don't know. I am one of the most pro-Chris posters on here, but I don't really expect Chris or anyone else not on this board to do too much distinguishing between us.

The main point of this board is to laugh at Chris. And to seek out and discuss things about him that he doesn't want sought out. So I can see why Chris and his closest supporters would just be against the whole concept of the board and everyone on it.

I am not trying to castigate all of us. Chris makes a buffoon of himself in public and says some ridiculous and offensive shit. So we laugh at him. I get it. I find it funny. But I don't expect Chris or anyone else to like it.
 
Exactly. I don't hate Chris at all or wish anything terrible upon him, or her (I'm not sure which is Chris's preferred pronoun), nor am I interested in mocking him for his autism; my younger brother is autistic. I just love OPL's antics. I'm not even against Tumblr or SJW's. It's just the fucking self-righteous white-knight crusading I can't stand.
 
voker57 said:
If you mean the 16-second bigbooty sighting piece, I hoped that there's more that can be salvaged from Rammspieler's footage without disclosing any sensitive data filmed in public area.
Click to expand...
I would show the part of Barb being picked up by Chris. But the White Knight comes out in that one.
 
Rammspieler said:
I would show the part of Barb being picked up by Chris. But the White Knight comes out in that one.
Click to expand...
Why are you protecting the WK's identity? They are clearly trying to get involved, not like it's innocent bystander who would be harassed by :julay:
 
Rammspieler said:
I would show the part of Barb being picked up by Chris. But the White Knight comes out in that one.
Click to expand...
If she knows about us, and she's still committing herself to WKing, she obvs doesnt care if she's seen. It's no use trying to protect her
 
voker57 said:
Why are you protecting the WK's identity? They are clearly trying to get involved, not like it's innocent bystander who would be harassed by :julay:
Click to expand...
Sigyn said:
If she knows about us, and she's still committing herself to WKing, she obvs doesnt care if she's seen. It's no use trying to protect her
Click to expand...
Probably becuase he doesn't want to eal with any potential headaches or some asshole pestering him later on. I would do the same.
 
You know it's sad when most of this could have have been avoided if Chris had a caretaker instead of being allowed to run amok unsupervised. Now they've got a shitstorm to navigate but it's not their fault...I guess the apple didn't fall far from the tree when it comes to passing off blame.
 
Last edited:
I just realized something:

CHARGE: DANGEROUS GAS UNLAWFUL RELEASE (§ 18.2-312. Illegal use of tear gas, phosgene and other gases.) "If any person maliciously release or cause or procure to be released in any private home, place of business or place of public gathering any tear gas, mustard gas, phosgene gas or other noxious or nauseating gases or mixtures of chemicals designed to, and capable of, producing vile or injurious or nauseating odors or gases, and bodily injury results to any person from such gas or odor, the offending person shall be guilty of a Class 3 felony. "If such act be done unlawfully, but not maliciously, the offending person shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony."
Click to expand...

Herring was later confirmed to be unharmed, although he did leave work after the incident.
Click to expand...

Unless I'm really misinterpreting the law, doesn't this mean Chris cannot be found guilty of this charge? The way it's worded, it seems like guilt is predicated on resultant bodily injury, which didn't occur.

Is it possible these continuances are partly about the state figuring out what Chris can actually be convicted of?
 
timtommy said:
I don't know. I am one of the most pro-Chris posters on here, but I don't really expect Chris or anyone else not on this board to do too much distinguishing between us.

The main point of this board is to laugh at Chris. And to seek out and discuss things about him that he doesn't want sought out. So I can see why Chris and his closest supporters would just be against the whole concept of the board and everyone on it.

I am not trying to castigate all of us. Chris makes a buffoon of himself in public and says some ridiculous and offensive shit. So we laugh at him. I get it. I find it funny. But I don't expect Chris or anyone else to like it.
Click to expand...

True, I hadn't looked at it like that.. I can see where it would be rather difficult to make the distinction or maybe even why one might not feel particularly moved to do so. To an outsider, we probably all look rather odd and they wouldn't know, say, a field agent from a casual observer, etc.

However, I think it IS pretty clear that interest in him wasn't sparked, "all because he has a mental condition" and I do question the judgement of a person who admits that they thought they were targeted by a "spy ring".
 
I just realized something too; that the dangerous release of gas was referring to the mace and not Chris farting in the courtroom.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom