In terms of time spent, no it’s no different. You’re either going to spend the time working or studying. Now consider this:
1. You’re opposed to military service because you don’t want to kill people.
2. You enjoy learning and you do well in school.
3. You don’t have any particular skills.
4. You don’t enjoy manual labor.
Why would going to school for five years be difficult? The only argument left is about debt, but teachers can get their loans forgiven, so that’s really a non-issue.
You seem to be bent that working as a trucker or some other boring-as-hell job is the optimal choice for everyone, and that’s simply exceptional, and you look exceptional when you say things like becoming a teacher is some huge life-wasting investment, when compared to Ph.D.’s and M.D.’s it’s nothing. It’s all a matter of perspective. You look at one more year for a credential as hell. A lot of people don’t. Some people enjoy that time of their life. Some people even enjoy their time getting their Ph.D. They make the most of it by attending seminars, conferences, etc. Education is not just a means to an end. It’s something that is actually fun for a lot of people.
You're so mad, and your reading comprehension is so poor. Go sit in the corner.
1) I was using a four year military enlistment as an equivalent barrier to entry to a four year degree, you absolute unit of density. I was in no way saying "join the military." I never, ever recommend joining the military. Feel free to spend the entire day searching my post history if you think you can find a single instance where I said "everyone should join the military."
2) Durr me no enjoy learning. Me am just dum dum.
3) Your mother has some particular skills.
4) Nobody enjoys manual labor. That's why you have to pay people to do it.
Going to school for five years is a barrier to entry, holey underwear. Five years is a long time, and I can tell you from painful experience that people with bachelor's degrees are no more well-rounded or interested in the world than people without. This country is full of mouthbreathers who think they're Socrates because they got seconds on the High School experience.
In theory, college could be a place where really smart people work together to learn and learn about learning. In practice, it's just a handy way to divide society between those who have the resources to delay making money for years "smart," or "middle class," and those utter fools who don't have the support network to spend eight semesters falling asleep to powerpoint.
Nor have I ever said trucking or other boring-ass jobs are the optimal for everyone. I've recommended that young, unmarried men consider driving a truck. Everyone who likes eating should take a lucrative job with relatively low barriers to entry, if they aren't already dead set on casting bronzes or sorting artifacts or sexing rats.
"Nobody should get a worthless degree" does not mean "all degrees are worthless." "Five years of college is a bigger barrier to entry than OJT to make the same or better money" does not mean "it can't be done."
You've proved my point for me multiple times by saying "people that really want to be teachers can do it." Yes, highly motivated people will overcome that barrier to entry. Nobody ever considers teaching third grade as a simple job, and that's a problem, because it means you select against plenty of people who could teach snot-noses long division. That's not hard. Requiring 5 years of training doesn't make the teachers smarter. It narrows the recruitment pool.
I'm not some boomerposter saying everyone should drive a truck, and I have, in fact, read upwards of three books. Four, if you count my audio version of "A Great Day for Up."