💰 Grifter Boogie / Boogie2988 / "Francis" / Steven Jason Williams - Fat, Rapidly Declining Divorced "Nice Guy" Middle-Aged Youtuber, Former Edgy Porn Blogger, lied about having cancer and being molested. Cohost of fake drama show "Lolcow Live (LCL)". Just WILL NOT die.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
AnOminous said:
I believe that was signed into law January 14, 2021, if it's this law:

We'll see if it's retroactive, because Boogie did his "warning shot" back in 2020. In any event, it doesn't really impact the outcome, as whatever protections castle doctrine gives, Boogie would have them, since he was actually in his house.

In any event, Arkansas is apparently now a straight up stand your ground state, although it was merely a castle doctrine state when Boogie went full retard.

Yes, because if you just plead guilty, what do you have to negotiate with? It's anticipated that a defendant is going to plead not guilty, and possibly engage in motion practice before the trial, such as to exclude evidence like contraband seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. If the defense wins that motion in a drug case, the case is basically over and they usually give up, and if they lose, the defendant usually pleads guilty to something.

A plea bargain is sometimes not even reached until the jury has already been empaneled.

That even happened to me when I got jury duty. So I got to sit around for six hours drinking old coffee and eating vending machine food, only to be called upstairs, and then immediately dismissed because the case pled out.
Click to expand...
That’s it! That’s what I was missing, sorry about that. My point was actually at the time of the warning shot it wasn’t a stand your ground state. I doubt it’ll be retroactive or anything, to my limited knowledge criminal laws rarely are, no?
anyways all the defense laws aside- it stands to reason that if you feel comfortable enough to fire a warning shot you’re probably not in life threatening danger. If you’re not prepared to shoot someone you shouldn’t have introduced (and escalated the situation with) firearms. This is a hurdle that I absolutely do not envy his attorney. I figure they’re going to go a little harder on boogie bc of all the play it got online and on the drama channels.
 
boobnoobmcgoob said:
I’m so sick of Boogie’s brain-dead supporters. They’re either sleazeballs like him or too slow to realize what a scumbag he is.
I wouldn't be surprised if they’re all just feigning hospitality so they can give themselves virtue points.

View attachment 2168027
Click to expand...
"YouTubers need to be able to protect themselves from crazy fans, just like A-List celebrities"

This shit is so gay. I agree with what he said just like I agree that everyone should be able to defend themselves, but that's not what I'm talking about. I mean the kind of people who live such sad lives that they adopt some sick personality around constantly rallying behind their favorite YouTuber, I seriously don't get it. The same people who Tweet nonstop about how Youtube's algorithm or monetization platform is broken because Ethan Klein or someone similar doesn't get enough shekels, when they don't even have a channel themselves.

"@YouTubeSupport uhm why are H3's videos not showing up in my recommended feed anymore? This is unacceptable!" like damn nigga shut the fuck up lol, pretty sure they'll be fine.

"Celebrities also get depressed you know, money doesn't make them immune!", yeah no shit, why are you saying this? It's real "hope she sees this bro" energy and mad annoying seeing how many people like this are out there. I wouldn't say I'm MATI but shit's just weird to me.
 
don acrobat said:
jesus christ, theres like every flavor of cuck in this one image. how sad is it that Boogies real fans are even more cartoonish and idiotic than his alts.
Click to expand...
One fun facet of Boogie's downslide the last few years is how literally retarded his remaining fans are. Dude probably has more mental defectives forking over cash than DSP.
 
Last edited:
You know what to do.
www.change.org

Sign the Petition

Give Boogie2988 The Death Penalty
www.change.org www.change.org
sign it.png

Yes, I'm aware this won't do anything. It's just for the lulz.
 
Last edited:
Snom Clubber said:
You know what to do.
www.change.org

Sign the Petition

Give Boogie2988 The Death Penalty
www.change.org www.change.org
View attachment 2168575

Yes, I'm aware this won't do anything. It's just for the lulz.
Click to expand...
Sentence known white supremacist and school shooter "boogie 1488" to death

"Something good came from the holocaust" testified Boogie after mocking gay rights saying "they can wait 30 years". Ironically, he considers those who criticize him to be "worse than nazis" since at least they had a mission.

He cant keep getting away with it
 
Marchesa of the Vast said:
One fun facet of Boogie's downslide the last few years is how literally retarded his remaining fans are. Dude probably has more mental defectives forking over cash that DSP.
Click to expand...
You can show a Boogie fan definitive evidence that he lied about being raped and they still defend him. They're as low IQ as they come.
 
RodgerDodger said:
I'm not sure that threatening to kill someone if they come to your house counts really works in the charging context of attempted murder. You order up your victim online like Grubhub? Granted it does fit in with the lifestyle of these fat fucks.
Click to expand...
It shows malice aforethought(intent). It would actually make a better argument for reckless endangerment(A complete disregard for human life in your actions).
 
Yaniv’s Hairy Balls said:
That’s it! That’s what I was missing, sorry about that. My point was actually at the time of the warning shot it wasn’t a stand your ground state. I doubt it’ll be retroactive or anything, to my limited knowledge criminal laws rarely are, no?
Click to expand...
If they impose new criminal liability, they're an ex post facto law because they're punishing someone for something they couldn't know would be made illegal later, but this amendment makes something legal that was illegal previously. It doesn't give an effective date, so I'm going to assume (and you know the dangers of that) that it took effect immediately, but I'm not sure about retroactivity.

I think the prosecutor believes he can win with either interpretation though. If I'm reading the amendment properly, it extends the protections previously reserved for the "castle" to anywhere a person is lawfully present, and deletes the language about duty to retreat, and possibly other things.

I don't think it's relevant to Boogie either because he had no duty to retreat anyway.

This makes the protection similar to other SYG states like Florida. It doesn't seem to give a special hearing on the issue before trial, though, which Florida does.
 
do jails have to feed morbidly obese youtubers 4000 calories a day?
Yaniv’s Hairy Balls said:
That’s it! That’s what I was missing, sorry about that. My point was actually at the time of the warning shot it wasn’t a stand your ground state. I doubt it’ll be retroactive or anything, to my limited knowledge criminal laws rarely are, no?
anyways all the defense laws aside- it stands to reason that if you feel comfortable enough to fire a warning shot you’re probably not in life threatening danger. If you’re not prepared to shoot someone you shouldn’t have introduced (and escalated the situation with) firearms. This is a hurdle that I absolutely do not envy his attorney. I figure they’re going to go a little harder on boogie bc of all the play it got online and on the drama channels.
Click to expand...
Did you even read what he was charged with before speculating? It has nothing to do with stand your ground or a duty to retreat. he has a duty not to fire his gun in the middle of a city for no reason.
 
MavisBeaconTeachesSnipin said:
suspended sentence sounds about right imo.

idk I know the justice system loves incarceration but I think that's usually more about violent crime and drugs. boogie's case is the kind where the state will act like their priority is not taking responsibility for housing and feeding another retard. at least that's the only way I can rationalize how I've seen courts act personally.
Click to expand...

He's stupid but not much of a threat to others because he rarely leaves the house and is so fat he can barely actually leave the house.

He's not as stupid as Chrischan though, and he looks less disabled in the mental sense but also looks more normal visually. Boogie could get the "behave and go to therapy and get a rose trophy" treatment. But because he's not as visually exceptional and has no paper trail history going back to his schooldays of being special, he might get some time in county.

My vote is that they don't really do much though. Biggest mitigating factor after his size would be how many meds he takes, doctors visits, etc. Prison is better set up for that sort of care than jail.

But it's not like giving him house arrest would really be different than what he already is doing (and most of us because Covid) They could restrict him from streaming or social media, since the offence stemmed from online related stuff. Though he could argue that is his job. It's not the same as restricting a pedophile from the internet when they're released on bail or as part of their sentence. If he was restricted he would just play games, vlog reviews to post later while whining about how the mean man who he "didn't even unload lead into you guise" made the review too late to be relevant, and prerecord other videos to release once his sentence was up. Return of Francis, more whiny and angry than ever.
 
NulWillBecomeTranny said:
Did you even read what he was charged with before speculating? It has nothing to do with stand your ground or a duty to retreat. he has a duty not to fire his gun in the middle of a city for no reason.
Click to expand...
That's right in the statute. The analysis of whether deadly force was authorized is at least partly based on the lack of a duty to retreat. If you meet every other element that justifies the use of deadly force, but have a duty to retreat, then you still can't use deadly force without doing that first.

So part of the analysis would involve that, since Boogie's only real defense is that he was justified in his use of force. If it came down solely to that one issue, Boogie would win. But he completely fails every other element of self-defense.
 
boobnoobmcgoob said:
I’m so sick of Boogie’s brain-dead supporters. They’re either sleazeballs like him or too slow to realize what a scumbag he is.
I wouldn't be surprised if they’re all just feigning hospitality so they can give themselves virtue points.

View attachment 2168027View attachment 2167961View attachment 2167954View attachment 2167958
Click to expand...

Fucking lol at people with 'BLACK LIVES MATTER' in their Twitter bios suddenly becoming staunch defenders of using firearms in self-defence...

Tetra said:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=u6k9BFbnRSY
this guy is really on top of his game
he cashed in on the harassment thing last year when frank showed up aswell
Click to expand...

What a fucking bullshit story. I have a seriously hard time believing cops would have shown up, arrested and booked someone for being one month late not returning a rented videogame. He cleared wanted to claim he had been arrested before to look "badass" or whatever and that was the most plausible story he could think of at the time.
 
Last edited:
DOUCHEQUEER said:
Fucking lol at people with 'BLACK LIVES MATTER' in their Twitter bios suddenly becoming staunch defenders of using firearms in self-defence...
Click to expand...
I think it's perfectly consistent. They're for using firearms to assault others, but against using them for self defense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom