- Joined
- Feb 27, 2017
Wasn't she in the adult industry as Locke Valentine back in 2007?I think it was around 2007 or so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasn't she in the adult industry as Locke Valentine back in 2007?I think it was around 2007 or so.
Zoë Tiberius Quinn (born 1987) is an American video game developer, programmer, writer, and artist.
As of 2014 she was also working on a full motion video game starring Greg Sestero.
Oh god no not Mark. Please, anybody but Mark. Don't tell me he's a faggot, I don't want him to be a faggot, please
He's a working actor. He probably took his paycheck, did whatever bullshit, and left.Oh god no not Mark. Please, anybody but Mark. Don't tell me he's a faggot, I don't want him to be a faggot, please![]()
He's a working actor. He probably took his paycheck, did whatever bullshit, and left.
Maybe, but how was he to know? The money would look the same to him either way.He might have been the recipient of the Rebel Jam money, all of the money for that probably went into "Camp is not Dead".
edit: well, to the extent that any money was spent on making a game.
My favorite is that mombot got 9volt to admit to his disgusting foot fetish and he had to leave twitter for awhile.
Mombot contjnues ti mock and ridicule him and others like Zoe by pointing out their lies and hypocrisy while at the same time being a good person who doesn’t say racist/bigoted things so they can’t touch her.
It wasn't a generation gap. The most fervent anti-GG journalists were part of the invasion of woke millennials into the hobby ca. 2010 when Braid and Fez showed you could make a living being a pretentious hack indie developer (or by covering the pretentious hack indie developers, as it may be), the older guys just played along because they were trying to support families at that point and didn't want/need to become a target. See: how Penny Arcade and the Giantbomb guys handled GG, despite years of contradictory opinions on this kind of censorious attitude on games beforehand.
Doesn't explain why the generation that wrote the magazines actually understood games while the ones online now just don't even bother trying to play them, just write up a blog post with some information about it that's easy to find and then fill the rest of it with politics.
Well, in the past they got paid to do work... And many came out of magazines that were endorsed or sponsored by console manufacturers(like many Nintendo/Sony magazines around the world) so they were expected to play games. It was in their job description. At Kotaku? Who knows what they're supposed to do, probably something about 'culture' and shit.
It was always an enthusiast press though, in the past if someone could play through a game and in a timely manner write a text/review that was on point and didn't give the editor seizures trying to work out what it meant then that someone had a foot in the door. Being enthusiasts they were also enthusiastic, even traveling far like from Europe to E3/Tokyo Game Show was an opportunity and they looked forward to it, they would get a lot of things for the magazine out of that and they actually liked sharing their excitement with their audience. The recent generation hates their audience and just groans and complains about having to go somewhere and talk to people. "why can't someone else do it, why do I have to cover it? urgh" - 95% of gaming journalists these days. Oh, they also bemoan that E3 is open to the public so it's not exclusive anymore.
So in the past gamejournos were like models(ok, hear me out on this one) in that it didn't require academic credentials or even a high school diploma to become big in a profession with some visibility. They were unqualified jobs but if someone could hack it they could do well enough or advance their careers into some other part of the games industry(Patrik Södergren who recently left EA started in gaming as a writer for the official Swedish Nintendo magazine, nice career trajectory).
These days gamejournos are like the millions of instagram models, it's just online thottery and attention grabbing with no real way to go from there, no career progression. Instagram thots can at least do some hooking(honorable mention: Zoe) but what about people like Grayson? He appears to be a bit above the rim of competence at Kotaku but he's stuck in an unqualified job with no way of advancing his career or parleying it into something different, something almost entirely caused by him and his colleagues nuking their own field and making themselves radioactive.
No wonder he and so many others are pissed and feel threatened, they're stuck on a ledge and down is the only way to get off of it. Whatever Kotaku is paying him will be more than the only jobs he's qualified to get in the blue collar workforce where people actually have to work for a living.
Brad Shoemaker had a similar story. Him and his friend created a fake game review site so they could go to E3.Which year? People cheated their way into E3 by claiming to be a publication or faking credentials in some way, that's the Destructoid & Jim Sterling origin story, it was a while ago.
At one point for the gamers that really wanted to go to E3, it was also a viable strategy to get a part-time shift at a GameStop and get access that way; one or two clerks per store with the financial means to go were sent to get insider perspective on upcoming games that would help drive pre-order sales goals. I remember a few clerks bragging about getting to go roughly 10 years ago.Brad Shoemaker had a similar story. Him and his friend created a fake game review site so they could go to E3.
![]()
Apparently, Mr Grayson continues to be a relevance-seeking tard.
I'm laughing at Asmongold being in that discussion too; he's not one of the wrong-thinkers Nathan's pointing out specifically but he seems to be falling into the same online spiral Destiny flushed himself down years ago. Thread soon, I imagine.
Imagine the sheer balls necessary to write that about your own Mary Sue.
He hasn't already? Pretty sure he's shown that he doesn't have any balls metaphorically, I just figured he also didn't have any actually.
evidence is strong that he might have knocked Chelsea up, but it's a coin toss whether or not the abortion was his or he was being an extra-loyal cuck that time he paid for her hanger-coating.He hasn't already? Pretty sure he's shown that he doesn't have any balls metaphorically, I just figured he also didn't have any actually.
Considering that she's had more semen in her than the whole worlds Navy it would be hard to find out who the father could have been.evidence is strong that he might have knocked Chelsea up, but it's a coin toss whether or not the abortion was his or he was being an extra-loyal cuck that time he paid for her hanger-coating.
evidence is strong that he might have knocked Chelsea up, but it's a coin toss whether or not the abortion was his or he was being an extra-loyal cuck that time he paid for her hanger-coating.
I don't know which is the worst scenario: getting knocked up by Nathan Grayson, or knocking up Zoe Quinn.
How is she not been blacklisted yet?