📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I don’t have an X account, and I refuse to start one, so I can’t dig deeper than this.
View attachment 8155500

You know how when someone goes very much out of their way to express how much they don’t care about something/how much something doesn’t offend them, and it accomplishes the exact opposite? Yeah…rest assured, this troon is deeply offended. Comparing a slur against you to a rhyming word that you have a positive association with is an insanely desperate reach to try and publicly put on a happy face and hide the fact that you’re seething to your core. You’re fooling no one, troon.

It’d be like a black person saying, “Why is ‘nigger’ a slur?? It’s not even offensive, it just reminds me of ‘trigger’ and I love shooting. so yeah,, can’t offend me with that shit…” Unbelievably delusional :story:
I agree with this guy, actually. I'd love to be able to call these people troons without any chance of social blowback from their side. Not that it stops me much anyway, but still. Do this with the British bundle of sticks word too, please, that's another good word they need to be hearing.
 
Trannies will pivot from "you can't affect me by saying a word" to "freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences" in exactly the space of time that it takes for someone to say that word.
 
One of them had the fucking nerve to say “I’m not into dick.”
This is what heterosexual men often say to gay men who proposition them, and its usually considered a good-enough excuse.
Why isn't it okay here too?

Didn't say they were a woman or a man, but straight to the point: not into dick. Period.
To me, this is a fair and non-transphobic reply, so why isn't it good enough?

I will never understand the convoluted psychology of these ppl.
 
G5fUeOFbcAMKFdS.jpg




Pooner: Yay, feeling amazing on boyjuice!

Also pooner: oh btw, my neck is fucked

The wonderful world of gender affirming care!

sauce: https://x.com/TTExulansic/status/1988291475487289740
 
I don’t have an X account, and I refuse to start one, so I can’t dig deeper than this.
View attachment 8155500

You know how when someone goes very much out of their way to express how much they don’t care about something/how much something doesn’t offend them, and it accomplishes the exact opposite? Yeah…rest assured, this troon is deeply offended. Comparing a slur against you to a rhyming word that you have a positive association with is an insanely desperate reach to try and publicly put on a happy face and hide the fact that you’re seething to your core. You’re fooling no one, troon.

It’d be like a black person saying, “Why is ‘nigger’ a slur?? It’s not even offensive, it just reminds me of ‘trigger’ and I love shooting. so yeah,, can’t offend me with that shit…” Unbelievably delusional :story:
It’s not intended to hurt. It’s just a thing people say that’s easier than “transgender person.” Fucking troons, not everything is about you, you know.
This is what heterosexual men often say to gay men who proposition them, and it’s usually considered a good-enough excuse.
Why isn't it okay here too?

Didn't say they were a woman or a man, but straight to the point: not into dick. Period.
To me, this is a fair and non-transphobic reply, so why isn't it good enough?

I will never understand the convoluted psychology of these ppl.
It’s not about the nature of the rejection, it’s the fact that it was a rejection. The guy claims transphobia when a woman told him she wasn’t dating anyone. There is no answer they could give that wouldn’t make him wail transphobia, other than “come and get it you big funky sex machine (feminine).”
 
A ftm has a tranny friend who makes a comment towards her and her boyfriend regarding the lack of equipment.
On this post, and the later post of the troon seething because a lesbian told him she didn't like dick, it's another classic case of tranny doublespeak.

Woman to tranny: I'm not into dick.
Tranny: NOOOOOOOOOO you can never mention or imply I have a dick under any circumstances! Any reminder that I have a penis makes my DYSPHORIC and SUICIDAL and uncontrollably violent! You can't even THINK I have a dick! When you see my turgid boner in the women's locker room your brain should automatically retcon it into a dainty little pussy (even though no one should associate penises or vaginas with men and women, because that's a transphobic hate crime)!

Same tranny in a random situation where no one's talking about anyone's genitals: Did you know I have a DICK? All the hottest girls have PENISES, just like me! Maybe your boyfriend wants to experience the mOuThFeEl of my DICK, an organ you do not have because you are a pooner? This is just a friendly reminder that I have a PENIS that I'm very proud of! I love it, I love talking about it, and I want everyone to see/touch/experience it for themselves!

The tranny brain sex argument is so unbelievably fucking stupid and trite.
Sorry to keep sperging on tranny doublespeak but this one is sooo egregious. If someone says "women don't have prostates" or "men can't menstruate because they don't have uteruses," it's "reducing someone to their parts!" and "hearts not parts!" (your heart is a part, btw) But then they'll turn around and say troons are women because they have ladybrains.
Your brain is an organ. Just like your liver or your gall bladder or your ovaries or your testicles. It's not some sacred intangible essence like an immortal soul. It's a big ball of wrinkly (or, in the case of trannies, smooth) tissue that lives in your skull. And if it's sitting in a big blocky male skull, it's a male brain, no matter how much it's wasted on lesbian porn and spinny skirts.
 
"This is the kind of discrimination trans women face" ... :'(
View attachment 8155028

I’ve had ~4 cisbians reject me in the last month. Two of them said something along the lines of “Sorry, I like women.” with that little smirk when they say ‘women’. One of them had the fucking nerve to say “I’m not into dick.” One decent one said “I’m not looking to date right now,” and didn’t try to passive aggressively insult me, but of course I knew the real reason.
This is the kind of discrimination trans women face. Especially lesbian trans women.
But of course, TERFs have the gall to deny it, and not only that; no, we have “male privilege” too.
Transmisogynists do not care about women. They care about those they deem “good enough”.

Candace Owens won't put on Colonial lingerie and scream "HARDER, MISTER JEFFERSON" while I fuck her until sunrise in a powdered wig. I know it's just because she's a racist who hates White people.

Where exactly does the "right to have sex with people I find attractive" appear in the Constitution or the UN Declaration of Human Rights?
 
Candace Owens won't put on Colonial lingerie and scream "HARDER, MISTER JEFFERSON" while I fuck her until sunrise in a powdered wig.
You clearly don't know her very well. :smug:

TLDR: I don’t think you’re bad or stupid, but you’ve ingested a truly shocking amount of dumb tranny propaganda and have not done your research. The end result is you making me MATI.
Jfc lady you fucking vaporized him.
 
Screenshot 2025-11-11 215439.png

I've decided to call transphobes 'homo sapiens' instead of their names

This post and its responses are clear proof, if more (or indeed any) were needed, that trannies are all autistic terminally online retards who have no experience of socializing in person.

There is nothing biological about names. Someone isn't scientifically born with the name 'Jeff.' Names are decided by humans by choice. They can believe that they are 'Jeff,' but that doesn't mean they can require me to call them 'Jeff.' They are homo sapiens.

If your sick burn necessitates a protracted explanation in order that both your interlocutor and any potential onlookers understand what the fuck you're talking about, you just might need to take it back to the drawing board for a second draft.

If I identify as a woman, and they will not recognize or gender me as how I identify myself, I have no obligation to call them by the names they identify with. They can argue legally that their names are 'Jeff.' Well, same brother. My legal documents represent how I identify as well.

But all respect. If you identify as 'Jeff,' good for you. I'm happy for you, and you do you. But I will not play into your bigotry, and I will not refer to you as something other than what you are scientifically, a homo sapien.

This is something trannies seem to be entirely incapable of grasping. They could "misgender" a so-called 'cis' person a thousand times or call them whatever retarded name they wish and it will be met with mild bemusement at best, outright mockery and pity at worst. This is because what we say we are is immutably and self-evidently aligned with what we actually are. This is not the case for trannies, which is why they chimp the fuck out when they get sir'd and normal people do not.

Also it also goes without saying that there is zero equivalence between not calling a man by his name and calling a man a woman.

It speaks to a certain lack of theory of mind (in addition to a lack of real life experience of human interaction) that this balding man in a dress thinks that calling a person a "homo sapien" in lieu of their name in public will result in any outcome other than them looking like a socially maladjusted retard.
 
Last edited:
It speaks to a certain lack of theory of mind (in addition to a lack of real life experience of human interaction) that this balding man in a dress thinks that calling a person a "homo sapien" in lieu of their name in public will result in any outcome other than them looking like a socially maladjusted retard.

Also this troon really cannot see how it would lead to someone mishearing or misunderstanding on purpose and asking why he is calling people homosexual?
 
Why isn't it okay here too?

Didn't say they were a woman or a man, but straight to the point: not into dick. Period.
To me, this is a fair and non-transphobic reply, so why isn't it good enough?

I will never understand the convoluted psychology of these ppl.
"You are worthy of love" mentality mutating into "You ARE OWED AND DESERVE love", basically. Troonism encourages dangerously selfish self-love, where self-centered actions are encouraged to troons by other troons who are too cowardly to do it to their own social circles or themselves.


That, and remind an AGP he's a man tosses him violently out of his mental fantasy of being a woman. Like giving an addict a shot of narcan, as other people said. People who have their addiction getting ripped out of their grasp get very angry.
 
Its something almost exclusively Women get too. Haven't seen an effeminate fag or troon wearing one. It's right on brand with Troons/Pooners being obtuse totems of their birth sex. Though pooners can do the troon "feminine" voice better than troons.
Have you never read the ADF thread? Tbf that's the only troon I can think of, and he got it because it's mostly girls getting them.
 
Its something almost exclusively Women get too. Haven't seen an effeminate fag or troon wearing one. It's right on brand with Troons/Pooners being obtuse totems of their birth sex. Though pooners can do the troon "feminine" voice better than troons.
Is it a rebellion against needing to be attractive? Or is it actually supposed to look good?
 
What the fuck is it with these people and septum piercings? Hideous.
Rebellious, native looking, it's always faggy jewelery with rhinestones instead of a simple small hoop in order to be extra fashionable and arthoe. It's like stick n poke tattoos but you only get poked once and get the same "boho free spirit" aura from it.
 
Back
Top Bottom