💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Stationary aszs]

The "secret sauce" to Nick's trial stream success was the panel format. That is to say, he had panelists on that knew considerably more about the law than he did. In some cases, actual practicing attorneys. They did the heavy lifting. He reaped the financial rewards.

I rather think he needs them more than they need him. And I don't think most of them want him anymore. I can't possibly imagine why.

He reminds me of Ralph in that regard. There is a skill and dignity in being able to run a show with guests that are simply better than you. It speaks to their biggest flaw that both of them weren’t able to keep it up: hubris.

It’s ok to take the back seat on your own show and let your guests shine, but it requires humility and being honest with yourself. You could be happy that you have the skill and talent to bring the real talent together, in an entertaining fashion, or you could become a resentful faggot and delude yourself into thinking you are the real star instead of the humble and skilled director.

Ultimately they both decided to become the entertainment instead of the entertainer

 

[Swole McPole]

He has been putting out a lot of shorts recently.

I've seen a lot of YouTubers complaining that you need to make a shedload of shorts if you want the algorhythm to favour you. The people I watch have generally turned up their noses and sneered, but I'm guessing Nick is starting to grow desperate.

He's fallen a long way. Does he do numbers as high as Kurt when he releases a YouTube video these days?

Even with more severe sanctions, it wouldn't always be a deal-breaker.

Having a thread on Kiwifarms would be a bigger red flag for me. If a lawyer is also a lolcow, that's gonna be a hard pass.

 

[Melty Butter]

Every viewer counts.
Tuckwheat is longing for eye contact.

Love your snark Daffodils but, also, there's something profound in this comment. Most of us former fans used to believe him. Looking into the camera meant something when he was wearing random t-shirts.

Nick is hiding himself behind blazers, button-downs, and the sunglasses. It's absurd and performative.

For funsies, let's assume he's sober. Interesting choice, to be hidden behind a costume. That's not who he is.

I'm fairly sure that an AA counselor would advise against it. (Also, @Pentamidine, I've been loving your posts about his costumes. Never stop.)

TLDR - he does NOT want to be honest. Nick wants to wear t-shirts and shorts and fuck April. He wants out of his marriage. Not a hot take, I know.

 

[waffle]

But yes, it would cut deep. It would also further stymie his ability to engage in trial streaming. Who wants legal commentary from somebody who got the professional ticket punched? Anybody?

I mean, some guys get disbarred for doing the F. Lee Bailey/Saul Goodman routine. Those guys still have an opinion worth listening to. Nick is gonna be like the chicken alien from Futurama who got disbarred for "that-there incompetence" so, not so much on the good opinions anyway.

I'd never hire Randaza. He's SO mercenary you always have to check in that nobody's making a better offer. That's just too much.

 

[AnOminous]

You'd probably also not offhandedly accuse an internet weirdo of being a pedophile, and if somehow you did you'd probably settle immediately.

I would Melton though. Because he actually is one. But yeah, if I actually did accuse someone of that and it was baseless, I'd apologize without even needing to be threatened with a lawsuit because that would be an incredibly lame thing to do.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

I mean, some guys get disbarred for doing the F. Lee Bailey/Saul Goodman routine. Those guys still have an opinion worth listening to. Nick is gonna be like the chicken alien from Futurama who got disbarred for "that-there incompetence" so, not so much on the good opinions anyway.

I'd never hire Randaza. He's SO mercenary you always have to check in that nobody's making a better offer. That's just too much.

*emphasis added*

Hey now! (one of my old avatars)

Someone wrote it in one of Meme Copium's chats, something about how they can't stand to listen to Nick on a stream, to the point they can't watch a Meme stream if Nick is the bulk of the video.

Now, imagine if you were to hire Nick as a lawyer (assuming he was licensed again)? Aside from the Goodwill-reject outfits, one would have to be really desperate to put your legal life in the balldoman's hands, with those manic mannerisms and the effeminate, whiny cringe voice. Heck, we already saw the outcome of his legal acumen with that fraud (skimming off the top, or maybe skimming from the tank) case Nick took on- he managed to argue the judge to give his client the maximum penalty.

 

[not william stenchever]

Nick is gonna be like the chicken alien from Futurama who got disbarred for "that-there incompetence" so, not so much on the good opinions anyway.

"Yah honnah, I move that I be disbarred for introducing this evidence against my own client"

 

[John Andrews Stan]

It's pretty funny Nick has been putting effort into trying to boost his place in the algorithm with shorts & click-bait titles, yet still had only 44 people live watching on YT, oblivious to the real need of addressing content & issues with the host.

Meanwhile streams like Kevin Brennan’s MLC — despite the channel owner deleting every stream immediately afterward, never producing Shorts, never asking people to like or sub, and frequently getting shadowbanned — can still consistently pull in several hundred people per stream and generate a few hundred thousand dollars per year.

Nick can work all the technical angles he wants, but trust is gained in drops and lost in buckets. He raged and said anyone who wasn’t interested in his degeneracy should fuck off forever — and they did.

Because Nick is an unrepentant POS, he’ll never admit that was a mistake.

 

[Peace Through Power]

I've seen a lot of YouTubers complaining that you need to make a shedload of shorts if you want the algorhythm to favour you. The people I watch have generally turned up their noses and sneered, but I'm guessing Nick is starting to grow desperate.

He's fallen a long way. Does he do numbers as high as Kurt when he releases a YouTube video these days?

I bet Nick copes that the algorithm causes his low viewership. The real reason is that he talks like a brain damaged methhead and dresses like the guy from scarface who was hanged from a helicopter.
Kurt doesn't seem to put up many videos after the Karen Reed trial. He still streams a lot more consistently compared to Nick.

 

[Folgers Can]

He definitely doesn't want the humiliation of the public announcement so he is trying to somehow keep it quiet by "voluntarily" ceasing to be a lawyer.

Plus maybe he'll be so indignant with any sort of punishment, he'll just surrender his license before they can impose it.

One can only hope that all the cope last night about being so done with a license that already served its purpose is because he thinks it clever to pull the trite "you can't fire me cuz I quit" gambit that you suggest, as he'd be in for one absolute hell of a rude awakening that could become cokestream-worthy. That's the oldest trick in the book and even when the Bar takes the disciplined lawyer's side the Minnesota Supreme Court has resoundingly rejected it over and over again for reasons of deterrence, not only for disbarments but also for suspensions, and the reference to "onerous public discipline" in general could support an argument for extending the doctrine to a public reprimand at some point, such as the rare opportunity to make a very public example of a nationally famous infamous YouTube commentator:


In re Streater, 115 N.W.2d 729, 733 (Minn. 1962)


In re Hetland, 275 N.W.2d 582, 584-585 (Minn. 1978 )


In re Johnson, 290 N.W.2d 604, 606 (Minn. 1980)


In re Peck, 302 N.W.2d 356, 360 (Minn. 1981).


In re Jones, 383 N.W.2d 303, 307 (Minn. 1986)


In re McCoy, 447 N.W.2d 887, 891 (Minn. 1989)


In re Rekieta, No. A26-0420, slip op. at 1 (Minn. May 23, 2026).


Try it, Nick. Please try it.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I'm fairly sure that an AA counselor would advise against it. (Also, @Pentamidine, I've been loving your posts about his costumes. Never stop.)

I don't think AA has counselors, and even if so, the general ethos of the thing seems to be encouraging people to think (and do the steps, but I mean in terms of choices in life) differently rather than advising specific things. The problem is him, not his clothes choices, regardless of what they might reflect about him.

All that said, Nick just isn't very complex or interesting as a person. He's a cow because he thinks he is.

 

[Captain Manning]

In re Peck, 302 N.W.2d 356, 360 (Minn. 1981).

"[P]etitioner argues that indefinite suspension or disbarment would be the appropriate remedy." (Emphasis added).

"[W]e order the respondents indefinite suspension."

That suggests two legally distinct forms of discipline.

Dennis F. Peck:




I wonder if Nick could meet the standard for "indefinite suspension."

I don't think AA has counselors

They don't. It's a peer-support model. The person that volunteers to run the meeting is a recovering addict/alcoholic themselves, but usually further along in their recovery.

I went to one of those meetings with a friend who was recovering from a substance abuse issue once.

the general ethos of the thing seems to be encouraging people to think (and do the steps, but I mean in terms of choices in life) differently rather than advising specific things. The problem is him, not his clothes choices, regardless of what they might reflect about him.

AA, NA, CA, and the other 12 step programs can work for people IF they admit they have a problem (it's literally the first step), and IF they want to recover.

You can probably already tell where I am going with this.

When Nick was ordered into group therapy (which in that case might have been run by professional counselor, but I dunno, and it doesn't matter) his entire mentality was that everybody else in the meeting was a loser, he doesn't have an addiction issue, and he doesn't need to be there.

So, naturally, that effort was wasted.

And don't even get me started on how he thought it would be a good idea for his community service to be that he has to be to run one of those meeting. That's a sick joke. I laughed good and hard when I heard that one.

 

[Fake News Anchor]

Nick's been looking good these last few streams. A real fast-talking lawyer just like in the good old days. He should really do something to reward himself. How about an affair and some polysubstance?

 

[Luke gama]

Am I crazy or does nicks come back not make sense his show was dying he said enough weirdo stuff to disgust other right wing people.


But suddenly he's doing podcasts and not one has brought up video clips that would turn the audience against him.


Even when he's put on the spot it's so soft ball
It feels like he's being pushed by someone
You could read this thread and have multiple clips that disgust normal people.

I can't think of any other guest on a podcast that has this level of dirty
And now he's "black white come together"


What the fuck is going on

 

[RaptInPlastic]

Am I crazy or does nicks come back not make sense his show was dying he said enough weirdo stuff to disgust other right wing people.


But suddenly he's doing podcasts and not one has brought up video clips that would turn the audience against him.


Even when he's put on the spot it's so soft ball
It feels like he's being pushed by someone
You could read this thread and have multiple clips that disgust normal people.

I can't think of any other guest on a podcast that has this level of dirty
And now he's "black white come together"


What the fuck is going on

They're all grifters so choose the simplest explanation. They are being paid to tolerate him. Mommy's money is as usual easing his way through his miserable life.

 

[Sneed Force One]

I'm hearing that Melton / Rekieta plan to launch some kind of HRO counter-suit against Aaron alongside a suit by Kayla, apparently Moody accidently blabbed it live on air, in which Melton gave him a death glare.

Its from an unreliable source who didn't give a timestamp, did any TLP viewers see it?

 

[RaptInPlastic]

I'm hearing that Melton / Rekieta plan to launch some kind of HRO counter-suit against Aaron alongside a suit by Kayla, apparently Moody accidently blabbed it live on air, in which Melton gave him a death glare.

Its from an unreliable source who didn't give a timestamp, did any TLP viewers see it?

Most likely this is the cope they dreamed up to explain away being pressured by the judge to agree to mutual HROs with Aaron. Instead of being honest it will be more lies like this.
Something like the "I am quitting being a lawyer" cope to explain his imminent involuntary suspension or whatever it is he gets.

 

[PuffyPopcorn]

I'm hearing that Melton / Rekieta plan to launch some kind of HRO counter-suit against Aaron alongside a suit by Kayla

Some actual lawyer should perhaps weigh in on it, but the discovery could be fun in that one. As Aaron pled out in his case regarding Kayla no evidence was put on the record.
Could the best defense against Kayla be that she posed willingly, or as a mitigating factor? And then put on evidence of her pernicious behavior. So image will be on the record along side messages and other fun stuff.
An HRO counter suit against Aaron will be dead in the water I think. Especially if Nick and Melton rejected an mutual "don't talk about each other" offer from Aaron in the HRO/TRO case against them.

 

[johnnynoname]

I'm hearing that Melton / Rekieta plan to launch.....

it's like will they just stahp, and just get on with the fawkin Rikieta/ Melton feud already?!

 

[Dean Pentel]

Nick's been looking good these last few streams. A real fast-talking lawyer just like in the good old days. He should really do something to reward himself. How about an affair and some polysubstance?

Only if he promises to include the kids. He's nothing if not a devout family man.