💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Vibralldo]

Let it never be said that he's incapable of learning:

Nick cleaning his cutting board with bleach wipes is the only time we should be thankful that he doesn't feed his kids

 

[RaptInPlastic]

Every viewer counts.

Unlike his arrogance in relation to his felony, this time he seems to be doing some performative pentient shit. I love the fact that technical and professional disciplinary shit causes him more problems that the criminal fucking law.
But also Family Services never went away and never stopped watching so his latest efforts might have landed him another jackpot. Who knows.

 

[Buster Bloodvessel]

Nick's pivot to only talking about "smaller cases" means his own, endlessly. His only other legal commentary is cri-tweeking an actual lawyer's better cooking.
---
Nick suddenly fought to get his other YT channels restored. Outside him needing a w regardless how little - what are the odds he knows he has to dump the main one that involves a lawyer/lawfirm, for legal reasons? He sure has been griping about the ethics stuff lately.
---
Is the move to bedroom stream part of the StarTrak saga? Or will it be from a grimy hovel of a hotel when he has to leave the home every other week in the divorce arc? (Do we really knkw that was Kayla feeding him?)
---
Is this new 30 min on YT then to Locals thing an attempt to show he brings viewers with hopes of a contract?
---
It's pretty funny Nick has been putting effort into trying to boost his place in the algorithm with shorts & click-bait titles, yet still had only 44 people live watching on YT, oblivious to the real need of addressing content & issues with the host.

 

[daffodils]

Is this nee 30 min on YT then to Locals an attempt to show he brings viewers with hopes of a contract?

No, Locals is almost dead. He's focusing on Youtube memberships now. The Locals member streams are also Youtube member streams. Simultaneous streaming to Locals probably just exists because it's easy to set up and will satisfy a few legacy members.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

Those sunglasses only make him look more retarded and more of a mess.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Every viewer counts.

Where are you finding these comments?

 

[Peace Through Power]

Where are you finding these comments?

Apparently from this short

and this short

He has been putting out a lot of shorts recently.


I'll give it two more weeks until he gives up on them again

 

[AltisticRight]

Imagine seeing this greasy unwashed skelly fuck whose ex-boyfriend went to jail for the crimes of making him and his wife orgasm repeatedly.
Time to give up. On life.

 

[Buster Bloodvessel]

"My career in law is mostly over [...] My purpose in becoming a lawyer was completed."

The purpose was supposedly to help others.

"I got a pretty significant scholarship because my LSAT score was pretty good."

He found his "special purpose."
He was promised a "job" (by Ape, under the table during the coke strea.
He reached career heights, only to have it rapidly collapse.

What a Jerk.

 

[Zab McMann]

"My career in law is mostly over [...] My purpose in becoming a lawyer was completed."

The purpose was supposedly to help others.

"I got a pretty significant scholarship because my LSAT score was pretty good."

The ethics board must be getting ready to rake him over the coals for everything he's done. No way he'd cope about not being a lawyer anymore when he'd normally fight the board to keep his title.

 

[Intrusive Thinker]

Nick's pivot to only talking about "smaller cases" means his own, endlessly. His only other legal commentary is cri-tweeking an actual lawyer's better cooking.

But but but - there is interest in smaller cases that none of the other content starved youtubers want to cover! He is just waiting for the perfect small case to cover (giving him the excuse to not stream, and the secondary excuse of why his viewcount might be tiny for these cases)

I like his new proposed approach, he can crash this plan in multiple ways. Rekieta BAILED on the last days of the last trial including the deliberations and verdict! If you watched the Karen Read trial with Nick, his abandonment probably was cushioned by the fact you could still join over a dozen better streamers to watch the end of that trial. But imagine wasting your time getting deeply involved in a smaller case with Nick, then have him bail on you and there are no other channels to go to.

I approve his new approach.

Nick suddenly fought to get his other YT channels restored. Outside him needing a w regardless how little - what are the odds he knows he has to dump the main one that involves a lawyer/lawfirm, for legal reasons? He sure has been griping about the ethics stuff lately.

oh! that is good, so he might be trying to revive the old channels as a life raft from his unsustainable lawyer title? what topics will he cover?

How do I determine if his drop in supertips has a causal relationship to the end of SNAP payments or is it merely correlated with it?

 

[RaptInPlastic]

The ethics board must be getting ready to rake him over the coals for everything he's done. No way he'd cope about not being a lawyer anymore when he'd normally fight the board to keep his title.

He definitely doesn't want the humiliation of the public announcement so he is trying to somehow keep it quiet by "voluntarily" ceasing to be a lawyer.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick did a little better than usual today.
View attachment 8116354

Every viewer counts.
View attachment 8116356View attachment 8116355

Tuckwheat is longing for eye contact.
View attachment 8116364

Lmao from number one or two on all of YouTube to Number Five on Pedotips, a failed platform run by a child molester.

It's pretty funny Nick has been putting effort into trying to boost his place in the algorithm with shorts & click-bait titles, yet still had only 44 people live watching on YT, oblivious to the real need of addressing content & issues with the host.

He should seethe about Kurt more. I'm sure there's an intense demand for a cocksucking fairy seething about some fat guy.

 

[not william stenchever]

Any BP mods here? Do we have enough space for another fat greasy deathfat with a 10k+ paged thread? Or will the two singularities of calories collide and end the universe?

The last thing Null's servers need is gravitational waves caused by two singularities orbiting each other more and more tightly until eventually they collide and emit a gamma ray burst.

 

[Captain Manning]

Legal Mindset's expression of forgiveness, deletion of arrest-era videos, and claim that he'd happily have Nick back on his show may just get Nick to take him up on the offer now that they just recently had a nice (shower) talk about it and are all good:

Your browser is not able to display this video.

Again, gross. And foolhardy.

Not terribly surprising though, given that LM, Coomalot, Gator, and Nick share common interests. They all deserve each other, IMO.

The ethics board must be getting ready to rake him over the coals for everything he's done. No way he'd cope about not being a lawyer anymore when he'd normally fight the board to keep his title.

Let's hope so. He has no business being a lawyer ever again.

A disbarment would be kino, because it would add a level of permanence to this that might not get from the felony conviction that could drop off after five years.

Disbarments in Minnesota are permanent:


(And yes, I am aware that it is the most severe, and therefore rare, punishment they can impose, but Nick is a genuine menace, so I'm still gonna hope).

I just hope it doesn't end up with something gay like "okay, 30 day suspension, and then you can take your CLE classes and get your license back."

EDIT: Elaboration.

 

[not william stenchever]

A disbarment would be kino, because it would add a level of permanence to this that might not get from the felony conviction that could drop off after five years.

Disbarments in Minnesota are permanent:

Nick doesn't really care that he can't uncoke his child, outside of the people responding to the news by rightly running him off the internet into his little hugbox. But disbarment would cut him so much deeper.

 

[Captain Manning]

Nick doesn't really care that he can't uncoke his child, outside of the people responding to the news by rightly running him off the internet into his little hugbox. But disbarment would cut him so much deeper.

For me, it's not just a "fuck you, Nick" thing.

I really truly believe he constitutes a severe liability to anybody who is entitled to and deserving of competent legal representation.

I am thinking as much preventative as I am punitive.

But yes, it would cut deep. It would also further stymie his ability to engage in trial streaming. Who wants legal commentary from somebody who got the professional ticket punched? Anybody?

 

[AnOminous]

(And yes, I am aware that it is the most severe, and therefore rare, punishment they can impose, but Nick is a genuine menace, so I'm still gonna hope).

Not going to happen. Minnesota has a few every year and if you look at them, they almost entirely involve absolutely extreme misconduct. Nick is more in the range of a brief suspension (but requiring some corrective measures to reinstate the license) or even a public or private reprimand.

If I had to make a bet on it, I'd bet either nothing happens or it's just a public reprimand. The latter isn't an entirely toothless punishment. Anyone looking him up will see it. However, speaking personally, such a thing wouldn't be a real deal-breaker for me if I were looking for a lawyer, unless the conduct in question was somehow directly relevant to what I wanted.

Even with more severe sanctions, it wouldn't always be a deal-breaker. To pick an example from this thread, if I had a serious First Amendment case and a hefty war chest, I wouldn't hesitate to hire Randazza, although I'd check to make sure he didn't have a conflict of interest related to the other side.

 

[not william stenchever]

if I had a serious First Amendment case and a hefty war chest, I wouldn't hesitate to hire Randazza, although I'd check to make sure he didn't have a conflict of interest related to the other side.

You'd probably also not offhandedly accuse an internet weirdo of being a pedophile, and if somehow you did you'd probably settle immediately.

 

[Captain Manning]

Not going to happen. Minnesota has a few every year and if you look at them, they almost entirely involve absolutely extreme misconduct. Nick is more in the range of a brief suspension (but requiring some corrective measures to reinstate the license) or even a public or private reprimand.

Yeah, I kinda figured. I have been told in the past it has to be super severe, like mismanaging client funds.

But still, a guy could hope. I certainly think he deserves it.

Plus maybe he'll be so indignant with any sort of punishment, he'll just surrender his license before they can impose it.

Bottom line is I don't think he has any business practicing law. I will die on that hill.