💰 Grifter Tactikal Templar / Christian Charles Gabrielli / TemplarsRoar / TemplarsVoice / Fan Advocacy Network / Chironus / Veyronus / the-300-Spartans - Self-described "giga traditionalist", pro-lolicon gooning freak, serial rapist/pedophile white-knight, fake-Catholic grifter, Hasan Derangement Syndrome, Synthetic Man-style politisperg, EXTREMELY FAT

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
It's horrifyingly fascinating how anyone can pretend put that armor on and just openly sin.
I should hope I never use the personal reminder under my name as a means to enrich my coffers.
Struggling sinners that we all are.



As a general rule, its suspicious when someone claims to be a tradcath while making the Crusades their whole personality.

From a theological standpoint the Crusades are a relic. At first they were a justified and necessary response to unchecked muslim aggression, and they saw success, being a sign of the positive influence the Church can have on the state. However the more Crusades that happened the more they became a sign of the negative influence that the state has on the Church when not kept separate.

People who cling too tightly to the Crusades demonstrate a failure to understand why we've left them in the past.
Partially... The crusades have a lesser known sequel in "The Holy Leagues".
1762105562796.png

These were primarily defensive style crusades designed in response to the ottomans invading Europe. There were other holy leagues where various European powers joined against one another, but last 5 leagues in the 1500-1700s achieved a great deal of success in stunting and beating back the Muslim invasions. One in particular the Battle of Lepanto (1571), was an absolutely incredible David vs goliath struggle were outnumbered Italian, Spanish and Austrian forces destroyed the Turk navy and ended their reign of terror on the seas.

1762106473922.png

Or the battle of Vienna (1683), where Poland quite literally saved Austria from speaking Muslim.
(Great movie by the way. Cheap, but earnest and historically correct)
To be clear, the Crusades were cool and based, emphasis on were. Not every Crusade, but enough of the early ones to establish the ethos. You should be equally suspicious of anyone who tries to say the Crusades were all bad or all good, because the truth is more complicated and nuanced than that.
At the end of the day the crusades were entirely justified by the frequent raids and atrocity's of the Muslims before hand. A lot of the later ones after the third were badly done, but not all of them, the 6th crusade was an underrated political success alongside the obscure Baron crusade.
The first crusade already had frenchmen fucking over the Eastern Roman Empire for personal gain and then they started fucking over each other. The fourth with the sacking of Constantinople and the abortion that was the "Latin Empire" should have been a sign to cease.
Legit question, I know the 1st crusade was primarily French but how did they screw them over in the beginning from your perspective? I thought it simply started out with one butthurt king dropping out and lying about the crusaders success so the East Romans would pull support.



In order to further washout the taste of fake crusader lolcow Id like to recommend a video detailing all the various actual crusader orders

I was surprised how many there were. a decent chunk of them were absorbed into the three original orders but not all of them, and certainly not the Spanish ones. They had 4 major orders that fought in the Reconquista. That was the period of liberation from the Muslims that had conquered and ruled over a good chunk of Spain for almost 800 years..... Yeah they don't teach that in the history books. The absolutely coolest bit of information was that Templar Order survivors actually formed two new groups in Spain and Portugal after they were dissolved.

The Order of Montesa

1762107909841.png


and The Order of Christ

1762107659243.png

Pretty cool stuff, and it just goes to show how history undersells the successes of the crusaders.
 
I once joined a Discord server for "gay Christians", back when I was considering converting to Christianity. I was expecting to see gay people who were more traditional and wanted a monogamous long-term relationship, who were anti-sexual hedonism. Instead, this server had polyamorous trannies.

Being a gay Christian is already somewhat of a stretch, and the defense for it is usually one of two camps: 1) being gay is okay as long as you "don't act on it", or 2) believing that homosexuality isn't actually against the Bible and that Sodom and Gomorrah was about outlawing pedophilia (claiming it was originally about "man shall not lie with boy" and not "man shall not lie with man").

But how the fuck can you be a polyamorous tranny Christian? At that point, what part of Christian morality are you even following? Lolicon gooner Christians seem to think they're above libtard trannies, but they're just as nonsensical and retarded. Heterosexual pedophilia is not "more based" than homosexual pedophilia.

how much lolis vtuber drama is out there to be two featured at the same time
Vtubers are probably all pedophiles. Most of them have prepubscent loli girls as avatars.
 
Legit question, I know the 1st crusade was primarily French but how did they screw them over in the beginning from your perspective? I thought it simply started out with one butthurt king dropping out and lying about the crusaders success so the East Romans would pull support.
The first crusade was a result of the Eastern Roman Empire asking for help to regain their lands, freeing the holy land from muslim oppression along the way, but it became clear relatively quickly that the 3rd and 4th sons of Norman nobility that were the leadership of the catholic part of the force were more interested in getting land and plunder for themselves. The ERE didn't turn around and leave them immediately but eventually they took the pragmatic route of letting them bicker amongst each other in between bouts of killing arabs.
 
This guy loves to take impossibly defendable positions doesnt he?
 
But how the fuck can you be a polyamorous tranny Christian? At that point, what part of Christian morality are you even following? Lolicon gooner Christians seem to think they're above libtard trannies, but they're just as nonsensical and retarded. Heterosexual pedophilia is not "more based" than homosexual pedophilia.

"I may deserve a millstone around my neck for diddling children in my heart, but at least I'm not a goddamn queer.
That's definitely a bigger sin!"

-the tradman (as he gooneth)
 
Last edited:
When people say they want a "trad wife" what they're actually saying is that they are a pedophile, either spiritually or literally, or both.

You want a woman who is always submissive, naïve, and (((PURE)))? That's basically or quite literally a child.
 
>past few pages are nothing but religionsperging
Holy shit nobody cares.

Screenshot_436.png
archive
As mentioned some posts ago, he's begun deleting and privating a lot of his old content, especially his lolicon gooner stuff. He's deflecting on Xitter and resorting to his classic insult of "you are all mentally ill fat retards". Speaking of that, I can't help but agree with the crowd that thinks he's fat (until he posts face) because he uses these exact words a lot. That's just a small sample, simply searching "from:templarsvoice fat" on Xitter will net you a lot of similar results. That's a lot of deflection, Christopher!

Anyways, a small collection of him slobbering in Vtumor comment sections and spreading his super important message about women that I'm sure he himself has definitely already achieved:
57284.png
archive

4353.png
archive

7354.png
archive

423432.png
archive

Looks like that one didn't fare too well, Chris!
2343.png

If you look into his results from last summer especially, you'll see he spent a lot of time arguing politics while simultaneously cooming over Vtubers. Truly a fulfilling life that follows traditional values.
 
When people say they want a "trad wife" what they're actually saying is that they are a pedophile, either spiritually or literally, or both.

You want a woman who is always submissive, naïve, and (((PURE)))? That's basically or quite literally a child.
I once did some work on a newly constructed house for a couple where the wife used to be a stripper. She seemed like a very down to earth and competent lady. The guy I was apprenticing under already knew them both and had a very high opinion of them. Incidentally she looked like she was very good at her previous line of work.

People should want a quality person as their partner in life, not some non existent person who fits their fetishistic checkboxes.
 
Asian culture is the only living, breathing, vibrant culture on the planet. Highly creative, highly productive, exceptionally good in all aspects.
The only good thing asians produce is tech. Outside of that, they are barely human, if at all.
Asian media = jewish media. You were brainwashed by it to the point you worship a foreign culture of people who (probably) are nothing like you.
the wife used to be a stripper.
quality person as their partner in life
:story:
 
Last edited:
I once did some work on a newly constructed house for a couple where the wife used to be a stripper. She seemed like a very down to earth and competent lady. The guy I was apprenticing under already knew them both and had a very high opinion of them. Incidentally she looked like she was very good at her previous line of work.

People should want a quality person as their partner in life, not some non existent person who fits their fetishistic checkboxes.
yeah it goes both ways. And they get cucked either way.
 
Back
Top Bottom