Opinion Tron: Ares is so bad it makes you wish AI would hurry up and destroy Hollywood - A shambolic film populated by some of the most aggressively charmless characters ever seen in a blockbuster

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
IMG_0364.webp
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/tron-ares-review/
https://archive.is/F4w3q

Robbie CollinChief Film Critic
07 October 2025 5:01pm BST

1.5/5 stars

There is a small group of films whose names double as reviews, and Tron: Ares is just a switch of its last two letters away from joining the club. The American film with the most unfortunate title in Britain since Our Souls At Night is a balloonishly pompous science-fiction smashathon, starring Jared Leto as the world’s greatest artificial intelligence programme, who beams out of his evil programmer’s mainframe and into the real world via an enormous 3D printer.
It’s a semi-sequel to 2010’s Tron: Legacy – which, at a time when cinematic universes were springing up everywhere, made a belated attempt to convert 1982’s Tron into a viable Disney franchise.

Ares makes an even less persuasive job of this than its predecessor, largely because its one good idea – the series’ signature high-speed motorbikes, the Light Cycles, streaking through a real city – comes buried under two hours of bloated and un-absorbing non-plot, populated by some of the most aggressively charmless characters seen in a blockbuster since the Star Wars prequels.

Leto, who also produces, is merely the most prominent offender, and the Morbius and Suicide Squad star is painted in an absurdly flattering light throughout. His Ares (pronounced Aries) is a sort of Byronic philosopher-ninja, and was developed by Evan Peters’s tech tyrant – the grandson of the original film’s David Warner – as the ultimate soldier for the AI warfare age.
The only catch? After 29 minutes on the loose, Ares’s programming glitches, and he collapses into a pile of pixels. So off he goes to find a mythical chunk of code written by Jeff Bridges’s Kevin Flynn, which can extend his lifespan to that of a regular human. Alas, the whereabouts of this digital holy grail is known only to Greta Lee’s programming whiz Eve Kim, who – double alas – as a heroine, has all the personality of a doorknob.

In the film’s wholly shambolic first act, Leto serves as the villain. But after rebelling against his creator and being supplanted by his former right-hand woman, Jodie Turner-Smith’s Athena, he reinvents himself as Eve’s sworn defender – and soon the two are hopping between corporeal and virtual planes, dodging peril that feels no realer in the flesh-and-blood world than the computerised one.

Elsewhere, Gillian Anderson has nothing to do but tut as Peters’s disapproving mother – one of a number of spots where the reshoot joins are visible – while the Leto-centric epilogue is an unwitting hoot: a David Brent vision of maverick cool. If AI really is about to destroy Hollywood, Ares has certainly got the ball rolling on its behalf.

In UK cinemas from October 10
 
Canonical guidelines on Programs going into the real world is wreaking mild havoc with the small but insane Tron fandom right now, which is used to doing a lot with very, very little.
 
The original was neat to watch when I was a kid, but I was born just too late to see it in theaters. The 2.0 game is, as others said, a fantastic if surprisingly difficult game (even has Bruce Boxleitner reprising his role, and disc duels are ridiculously fun). I got to see Legacy in theaters and that was enough. Ares not following on from Legacy is enough for me to skip watching altogether.
 
But Tron Ares seems to be going for a "soft reboot", tho I wouldnt even call it soft because it seems to full on ignore the events of Legacy (maybe its a bad time to mention that the creators of Ares actually said they dont care much for Legacy) to the point you would be excused to believe its an alternative sequel to the original.
The trend of modern movie makers hating legacy is not zoned in on enough. It goes beyond mere contempt of the original, like the Star Wars ST or Charlie's Angels reboot; Jurassic World Rebirth felt a need to reset the status quo change by the previous film three fucking years prior. They are so lazily, selfishly, pathologically averse to respecting anything that precedes them it results in their own work being discarded as heritage-less offal by the next installment choosing roots of the original.
 
Top Gun Maverick is one of the few legacy sequels to actually respect and improve the original.

Which again, makes it all the more baffling why they didn’t bring its director back for this film.
 
The trend of modern movie makers hating legacy is not zoned in on enough. It goes beyond mere contempt of the original, like the Star Wars ST or Charlie's Angels reboot; Jurassic World Rebirth felt a need to reset the status quo change by the previous film three fucking years prior. They are so lazily, selfishly, pathologically averse to respecting anything that precedes them it results in their own work being discarded as heritage-less offal by the next installment choosing roots of the original.

Its one way to admit you will never compare to the original and thus you wont even try. Legacy was flawed but you could tell it was trying to continue Tron without feeling like a re-harsh of the original because hey, the original already exists so why bother trying to replicate it? Do something new with familiar elements.

But you know, that requires risks and
Top Gun Maverick is one of the few legacy sequels to actually respect and improve the original.

While I wouldnt call Legacy superior to the original, I'd still say it tried to elevate itself to the likes of the original.
Which again, makes it all the more baffling why they didn’t bring its director back for this film.

Because he already directed Legacy and that movie underperformed thanks to Disney's awful marketing so they thought the director was to blame and they got the cheesehead that directed Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales and Maleficent: Mistress of Evil.

Tho if you ask me, I think they went with Rønning because he is the guy for low effort/risk sequels that Disney likely didnt have much faith in.
 
It goes beyond mere contempt of the original, like the Star Wars ST or Charlie's Angels reboot; J
I was going to quibble and say that the Diaz/Barrymore/Liu movies got back the original Charlie actor and even cameos by at least one of the original angels. It was meant to be a continuation of the original series.

But then I remembered the Kristen Stewart abomination and realised you probably meant that one. So yeah - point taken.

Battlefield Earth II
The one good thing in that movie is where the alien dude is standing there with all the humans in the cages and their language to him is just monkey chattering noises.

I like it because that's how I feel in public sometimes.
 
I knew this movie was doomed fromt he start. Not because of jared leto, but because it's "THER GONNA BE REAL THEY"RE GONNA COME TO THA REAL WORLD" when like the first two movies already established the running thing was "Human gets zooped into experimental computer simulation world due to rogue ai/fed conspiracy shit and has to get out". You're not gonna see cool shit like the first two movies, and the plot seemed to be just some company making soldiers shit with tron legacy aesthetics mashed on, there's no way it was gonna be good.
I'm just surprised Leto keeps getting major roles in movies.
I think he was alright in morbius for the guy he played. Morbius in general is a really funny shitshow of a movie and I 100% would reccomend you watch it sometime if you haven't. It clearly TRIES being a good movie but the fucking people making it have no clue about how vampire bats act or how to make things engaging in a way that isn't secondhand unintentional laughter. The reason people say it's "not really even worth watching for being bad" is because it's structured coherently enough that you don't immediately go AAAH HORRIBLE BAD MOVIE" but I think that actually adds to the humor. It's a movie that if it wasn't so fucking weird and bad in some really important areas would be viewed as a meh or ok movie. I really kinda liked how they thought out how he flew by catching the wind even if that's retarded as a concept physically it's a cool idea that he can just do the windy thing like that.


populated by some of the most aggressively charmless characters seen in a blockbuster since the Star Wars prequels.
Don't wanna upset daddy didney I guess, cause its' the sequels with no character. Prequels got wonderful guys like watto and dexter fucking jettster, the random dude trying to sell cigs to obi wan, jango, fuckign jar jar binks is a character who spawned infinite hate memes because of how much of an intentionally annoying sack of shit he was and that's given him a charm in a way too.

Only dude in the sequels worth a damn is babu frik because he's space hispanic or some shit like that and goes "WAHEEEY!" after lobotomizing c3p0.

The script needed polish and some actors replaced, so the parts between the set pieces were kinda dull but inoffensive. Its a real shame, if they had nailed the writing to make the story and characters as compelling as the visuals it would have been a hit.
I think the writing was fine for legacy, some parts were odd but not something that'd destroy the popularity of the movie. Maybe should watch it again sometime it's been fucking forever.
 
Morbius in general is a really funny shitshow of a movie and I 100% would reccomend you watch it sometime if you haven't. It clearly TRIES being a good movie but the fucking people making it have no clue about how vampire bats act or how to make things engaging in a way that isn't secondhand unintentional laughter. The reason people say it's "not really even worth watching for being bad" is because it's structured coherently enough that you don't immediately go AAAH HORRIBLE BAD MOVIE" but I think that actually adds to the humor. It's a movie that if it wasn't so fucking weird and bad in some really important areas would be viewed as a meh or ok movie. I really kinda liked how they thought out how he flew by catching the wind even if that's retarded as a concept physically it's a cool idea that he can just do the windy thing like that.

I actually kind of liked Morbius, because while it wasn't good, it was the closest thing I've seen in a long time to the sort of cheesy, edgy superhero movies they used to make in the late '90s, early '00s, where everybody wore black trenchcoats and there was a lot of nu metal on the soundtrack, which were a real guilty pleasure for me, growing up.

Because cinematic universe autism was a big thing at the time, there was a big to-do in nerd circles about 'Is Morbius part of the MCU?' or 'What universe does Morbius exist in?"
And, if you ask me, spiritually, it's obvious that Morbius takes place in the same universe as the Daredevil movie starring Ben Affleck and Colin Farrell.
 
Because he already directed Legacy and that movie underperformed thanks to Disney's awful marketing so they thought the director was to blame and they got the cheesehead that directed Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales and Maleficent: Mistress of Evil.

Tho if you ask me, I think they went with Rønning because he is the guy for low effort/risk sequels that Disney likely didnt have much faith in.
Even though his later films like Top Gun Maverick should’ve proven he was most certainly not to blame for Legacy’s box office (which wasn’t even bad, albeit not amazing).

Honestly, if it wasn’t for the fact that the series is a Disney created one, I’d think Ares was a case like Fant4stic or TASM2; a film made only to hold onto the rights.
 
It was boring af.

Nobody wanted a TRON sequel in the 80's, so it's dumb of them to think they could build a franchise out of a movie that was considered disappointing in 1982.

I didn't even know they made toys for the original movie.
View attachment 8014386
I never saw kids playing with TRON stuff in the early 80's, but everybody had the Star Wars toys.
TRON is one of those movies that got more popular overtime rather than being an instant hit. They reissued the figures several times over the decades since from different companies, and some companies put out more articulated figures closer in appearance to the actual movie with blacklight reactive paint. They did it for like 3 of the main guys but not the guards weirdly enough

1760187749809.png
They did a convention exclusive one that was the three they made in the old toy colors which was pretty cool.
1760187781433.png
This isn't going into all the other tron figures, games, and spinoff shit that's come out in the time between these came out and those original figures. I think TRON spiked intensely in popularity after they decided to include it in Kingdom Hearts 2, but I could be misremembering the timeline a bit here. It had already garnered quite a bit of popularity as one of the weirder/cooler disney movies before that but the honestly really faithful recreation of the digital world in a popular video game definitely boosted people talking about it in a way that eventually cascaded into legacy happening.
 
Last edited:
Other issues aside, Jared Leto's non-aging borders on supernatural. I'm sure money and Hollywood has something to do with it but he also clearly has some beautiful genes. This is him with his 73-year-old mother.

View attachment 8024352
He just looks like a normal long hair guy with a slightly filtered photo here, I wouldn't consider that "non-aging". He's not quite Al Yankovic levels of vampire genes.
 
He just looks like a normal long hair guy with a slightly filtered photo here, I wouldn't consider that "non-aging". He's not quite Al Yankovic levels of vampire genes.
"Jared Leto is just a normal looking man. He's no Weird Al Yankovic."

1760202430454.png

Absolutely hysterical opinion. Brava.
 
He is the straight male equivalent of Lizzo. Attractive in an unconventional and utterly non-threatening way, but "actually so musically talented!"
He's not obese, he's not constantly calling critics racist, he's just a dude that makes music he finds funny.

Also he's become one of those guys that cameos in almost everything but that's another cosmic threat.
 
Back
Top Bottom