Opinion Tron: Ares is so bad it makes you wish AI would hurry up and destroy Hollywood - A shambolic film populated by some of the most aggressively charmless characters ever seen in a blockbuster

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
IMG_0364.webp
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/tron-ares-review/
https://archive.is/F4w3q

Robbie CollinChief Film Critic
07 October 2025 5:01pm BST

1.5/5 stars

There is a small group of films whose names double as reviews, and Tron: Ares is just a switch of its last two letters away from joining the club. The American film with the most unfortunate title in Britain since Our Souls At Night is a balloonishly pompous science-fiction smashathon, starring Jared Leto as the world’s greatest artificial intelligence programme, who beams out of his evil programmer’s mainframe and into the real world via an enormous 3D printer.
It’s a semi-sequel to 2010’s Tron: Legacy – which, at a time when cinematic universes were springing up everywhere, made a belated attempt to convert 1982’s Tron into a viable Disney franchise.

Ares makes an even less persuasive job of this than its predecessor, largely because its one good idea – the series’ signature high-speed motorbikes, the Light Cycles, streaking through a real city – comes buried under two hours of bloated and un-absorbing non-plot, populated by some of the most aggressively charmless characters seen in a blockbuster since the Star Wars prequels.

Leto, who also produces, is merely the most prominent offender, and the Morbius and Suicide Squad star is painted in an absurdly flattering light throughout. His Ares (pronounced Aries) is a sort of Byronic philosopher-ninja, and was developed by Evan Peters’s tech tyrant – the grandson of the original film’s David Warner – as the ultimate soldier for the AI warfare age.
The only catch? After 29 minutes on the loose, Ares’s programming glitches, and he collapses into a pile of pixels. So off he goes to find a mythical chunk of code written by Jeff Bridges’s Kevin Flynn, which can extend his lifespan to that of a regular human. Alas, the whereabouts of this digital holy grail is known only to Greta Lee’s programming whiz Eve Kim, who – double alas – as a heroine, has all the personality of a doorknob.

In the film’s wholly shambolic first act, Leto serves as the villain. But after rebelling against his creator and being supplanted by his former right-hand woman, Jodie Turner-Smith’s Athena, he reinvents himself as Eve’s sworn defender – and soon the two are hopping between corporeal and virtual planes, dodging peril that feels no realer in the flesh-and-blood world than the computerised one.

Elsewhere, Gillian Anderson has nothing to do but tut as Peters’s disapproving mother – one of a number of spots where the reshoot joins are visible – while the Leto-centric epilogue is an unwitting hoot: a David Brent vision of maverick cool. If AI really is about to destroy Hollywood, Ares has certainly got the ball rolling on its behalf.

In UK cinemas from October 10
 
I don't hate Leto (as an actor) the way many people do, but Hollywood needs to understand he's a supporting actor, not a lead. Maybe this will finally teach them the lesson.
 
Let's release this shit for the 3rd time.
It flopped twice but this time it will surely succeed.
We'll put Jared Leto in the lead, everybody loves him
...
Wait... where did everybody go?
 
At least we got a couple of decent Nine Inch Nails tracks out of it, even if it is just lazy synthwave shit. Couldn't really care less about the movie. Same with the last one and the Daft Punk soundtrack.
 
The desire to turn everything into an infinite-sequel blockbuster-on-demand "Franchise" where instalment "X" only exists to set up instalment "X+1" by using some topical "jokes" and a bunch of callbacks to instalment "X - 1 " ?

Was never going to work.

Only Hollywood is puzzled as to why.

If those in charge of the place today had been so in the 90's?

We'd have been presented with our 8th reboot/sequel of Titanic by now....
 
The first one was okay and the second films ost was composed by daft punk.
The first one is a technical marvel but I always thought the story, characters, and general script were pretty dull. Legacy has the Daft Punk soundtrack and a young Olivia Wilde in skin tight spandex, but that's about it.
 
The first one is a technical marvel but I always thought the story, characters, and general script were pretty dull. Legacy has the Daft Punk soundtrack and a young Olivia Wilde in skin tight spandex, but that's about it.
Yeah, it had the scene where "Derezzed" was playing (and the Glitch Mob remix is superior, fight me), and Olivia Wilde staring around like a lemur and doing nothing but enforcing the meta that I'm supposed to think Olivia Wilde is interesting because she's hot (spoiler: she never was interesting).
 
I dunno, when critics shit on a movie, I tend to think it might merit a look.

Because modern critics these days are fucking retards.
 
Never seen the original. Legacy was not a good film but was a good pile of visuals. One of the few films I'd have actually enjoyed seeing in 3D as it was released in the midst of the 3D revival where people were buying 3D televisions (well, some did) and cinemas were investing in 3D movies. It's gorgeous to look at but not very interesting. Still, rarely though I will watch a film purely based on superficial flash and effects, Tron: Legacy is probably it.

Also, Michael Sheen made a great second-tier bad guy. Rarely seen someone do so much with such a small part.

 
the only decent entry from the Tron franchise was the game Tron 2.0, all the movies are kinda shit
The original movie was fine. It was a weird little story with some neat effects. Sequels were not really needed but when does that stop studios?

The Tron arcade game was super fun and I remember playing Tron: Deadly Discs on my friend's Intellivision. I seem to remember that game being fun.
 
Never seen the original. Legacy was not a good film but was a good pile of visuals. One of the few films I'd have actually enjoyed seeing in 3D as it was released in the midst of the 3D revival where people were buying 3D televisions (well, some did) and cinemas were investing in 3D movies. It's gorgeous to look at but not very interesting. Still, rarely though I will watch a film purely based on superficial flash and effects, Tron: Legacy is probably it.

With the absolutely amazing visuals in both design and direction, combined with the incredible soundtrack, Legacy really is a feast for the senses. I was lucky enough to see it on the big screen with full 3d and it blows you away with the depth and music. The script needed polish and some actors replaced, so the parts between the set pieces were kinda dull but inoffensive. Its a real shame, if they had nailed the writing to make the story and characters as compelling as the visuals it would have been a hit.
 
Back
Top Bottom