- Joined
- Nov 22, 2021
Marius normalized political violence and he also apparently used the Assemblies to overturn Senatorial commands which didn't help things. His idea of replacing Sulla as a commander of war was unprecedented because at that time Marius was being given command while also lacking any official title in the state (he was a private citizen). Whatever the strategy was, it backfired horribly. Sulla at this time was consul and had been given the position to be the one to lead this particular war effort. This whole debacle is the reason why he marched on Rome in the first place.Sulla didn't fix shit, he set the stage for the collapse of the Republic. He started a Civil War, and proved that if you have a big enough army you can just ignore the rules. S to Spit.
That being said, there weren't really any good choices.
This isn't a Roman history thread so I won't make anymore posts on this subject but let it be known both Marius and Sulla contributed to the collapse of the Republic, it wasn't a one man affair. Neither of them were good or bad, but they were both ambitious and had clashing goals.