🌟 Internet Famous Jason Thor Hall / PirateSoftware / Maldavius Figtree / DarkSphere Creations / Maldavius / Thorwich / Witness X / @PotatoSec - Incompetent Furry Programmer, Blizzard Nepo Baby, Lies about almost every thing in his life, Industry Shill, Carried by his father, Hate boner against Ross Scott of Accursed Farms, False Flagger

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Which will happen first?

  • Jason Hall finishes developing his game

    Votes: 38 0.7%
  • YandereDev finishes developing his game

    Votes: 597 10.6%
  • Grummz finishes developing his game

    Votes: 148 2.6%
  • Chris Roberts finishes developing his game

    Votes: 170 3.0%
  • Cold fusion

    Votes: 2,084 37.1%
  • The inevitable heat death of the universe

    Votes: 2,576 45.9%

  • Total voters
    5,613
But this can ALL be debunked by literally pointing to any game with hostable servers. Halflife, quake, doom, ect.

The only issue is hoping the advocates can illustrate these SIMPLE facts for the EU idiots to understand.

HONESTLY if these are their starting arguments, I feel confident as shit...IF we can get enough signatures.

View attachment 7606806
I would say it is probably pretty standard still today. At least internally.
I would imagine that due diligence when you build a hundred-million dollar piece of software that you always have alternatives.

In case Amazon changes its pricing model, or sunsets a service, so that you can re-deploy or migrate to an alternative.
That is just due diligence when you build something this expensive.

I would also imagine that they already have, possibly with significantly reduced functionality and featureset, versions of the game that runs locally without any of the cloud services.
Or they are building a game that the developers can not just spin up and do quick manual testing locally? Really? They build this huge complex piece of software and they can not spin up a slimmed down instance that runs locally on the developers laoptop? Lol, that is a laughable concept.
 
These people are literally living in fucking fairytail fantasy land.
Every god damn time.
They're the fucking asian parents of politics, demanding impossible success rather than praising what small successes can be had.
I saw earlier in this thread that SKG aims to amend existing legislation. This is literally good. The movement is trying to refine the laws on property rights in a digital age. This has been a long time coming.

Gotta edit this in because LMFAO

1751774747127.webp

Why would you ever admit that your politics came from losing a video game :story:
I mean, nothing wrong with that, just, you probably shouldn't have shared this publicly

DOUBLEPOSTING Because the libertarian says at the end of his video that he would be having a debate with Ross Scott on Stop Killing Games.
I predict that this will be an absolute shitshow.

Here's a clip from the video:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DOUBLEPOSTING Because the libertarian says at the end of his video that he would be having a debate with Ross Scott on Stop Killing Games.
Oh, wow this fuckin low-level libertarian can debate Ross, probably somewhat of an ego strike to actually debate Ross. Either he's gonna mald or hide more away from Ross depends on how much Ross wins (always)
 
Is there ANY proof he got swatted? I asked this several times and saw nothing yet. He claims he had a full police report, and we know where he lives, this shouldn't be hard to confirm or deny. I'm really starting to think he flat out never was and is just lying.

I'm almost wondering about pinging null to see if Hardin could put in a records request to see if it indeed happened whatsoever. However it happens, God DAMN I want a proven yes or no.
 
Oh, wow this fuckin low-level libertarian can debate Ross, probably somewhat of an ego strike to actually debate Ross. Either he's gonna mald or hide more away from Ross depends on how much Ross wins (always)
I hope Ross doesn't get caught up in "muh libertarian principles" spiel and explains the realpolitik at play. As well this will definitely look bad for libertarians trying to oppose or seemingly derailing the momentum of SKG, even if that may not be LiquidZulu's intention. LiquidZulu has made many videos talking about how bad IP really is, defending AI art using the IP argument, etc. etc.
 
Why would you ever admit that your politics came from losing a video game :story:
I mean, nothing wrong with that, just, you probably shouldn't have shared this publicly
That's just modern humor, like the joke about burning your house down because you saw a spider.
 
Lolbertarians love to say shit like "this doesn't fix the problem because the problem is systemic!" and then when you ask them what should be done and they say "Nothing!"

You have to sit either sit in your bed and cry while you wait for Ancapistan to happen, or you have do the exact opposite of what you want to accelerate the process of Ancapistan's creation. Because if you want your ass to not be fucked by a big black dildo, you have to shove a big black dildo in your ass so people will pity you enough to pull it out for you, instead of just not putting a giant dildo in your ass.
 
Why would you ever admit that your politics came from losing a video game
you might not like this, but GamerGate was a big awakening for a lot of people.
and that's really funny, it's a clear idea of "I just wanted to play video games, you've forced my hand"

YOU SHOULD'VE LET THAT MAN PLAY HIS SHITTY POKEMON FAN GAME NINTENDO
NOW YOU MADE A MONSTER
 
The video directly says that the issue stems from IP laws, copyrights and patents, and that the issue could be mitigated if IP was reformed if not abolished entirely. But for some reason suggesting this offends people.
That's a great idea and should happen. The problem is that's a lot harder to do and much further along than what SKG is trying to achieve. If anything, SKG pushes further towards that end goal.
 
The video directly says that the issue stems from IP laws, copyrights and patents, and that the issue could be mitigated if IP was reformed if not abolished entirely. But for some reason suggesting this offends people.
Because it's absolutely absurd and bringing it up right now ONLY serves to throw water on the only thing going on that is moving things in a positive direction.movements are made one step at a time. the prolife movement is by far the most successful grassroots movement in the us and they win by going after abortion in increments. saying skg doesnt go far enough isnt wrong, but that is a conversation to have after the signing period for the initative is closed.
 
Jesus this shit makes me MATI. I can't fucking stand Mald smugly playing the victim and I ESPECIALLY can't stand lolberts defending the rights of the corpos to rape us to death unless we completely demolish copyright/IP laws WHILE parroting Mald's worthless mouth diarrhea as justification.

I'll keep the politisperg brief: IP law REFORM is what we need instead of a Chinese wild west wasteland. SKG is, if successful, the kind of reform and regulation we NEED. God, fuck lolberts man, this shit pushed me over the edge.
 
The video directly says that the issue stems from IP laws, copyrights and patents, and that the issue could be mitigated if IP was reformed if not abolished entirely. But for some reason suggesting this offends people.
It would certainly be a strawman to say the libertarian wants us to do "Nothing!"
I think whoever suggested the game be made public domain along with the EoL plan is onto comething and would be a good compromise. But nothing more than that can be accepted by the general populace, I think.
 
Why would you ever admit that your politics came from losing a video game :story:
I mean, nothing wrong with that, just, you probably shouldn't have shared this publicly
>A corporation did something I hated. This radicalized me into becoming an anarcho-capitalist
What the fuck is wrong with these people?
 
DOUBLEPOSTING Because the libertarian says at the end of his video that he would be having a debate with Ross Scott on Stop Killing Games.
I predict that this will be an absolute shitshow.

Here's a clip from the video:
Recording 2025-07-06 121031.mp4
This is the kind of person Ross shouldn't talk to, Ross needs someone to bounce this sort of thing off of before he commits to anything.

I need the screenshot of this that's mental.
1751777136858.webp
| Archive
1751777239477.webp
| Archive

1751777258561.webp
| Archive

The Xitter thread
1751777378130.webp

| Archive
1751777401530.webp
| Archive
| Archive
| Archive
1751777611734.webp
1751777619701.webp
1751777625935.webp
1751777632401.webp
1751777687203.webp
1751777692153.webp
1751777695969.webp1751777700236.webp
1751777738404.webp
1751777780138.webp
1751777795171.webp
1751777809022.webp

Also see below.
According to Xitter user "the_patch_dev" (and kind of Thor himself), Thor's Discord may be running a campaign to sabotage the EU signatures.
View attachment 7590501
View attachment 7590508
Link | Archive
 
Last edited:
Jesus this shit makes me MATI. I can't fucking stand Mald smugly playing the victim and I ESPECIALLY can't stand lolberts defending the rights of the corpos to rape us to death unless we completely demolish copyright/IP laws WHILE parroting Mald's worthless mouth diarrhea as justification.

I'll keep the politisperg brief: IP law REFORM is what we need instead of a Chinese wild west wasteland. SKG is, if successful, the kind of reform and regulation we NEED. God, fuck lolberts man, this shit pushed me over the edge.
I think the problem with most internet lolberts is that they're actually just Neoliberals who've memorized enough of Libertarian language and ideology to make their bootlicking sound like it's edgy and anti-statist when most of it just amounts to concern trolling to protect the government-corporate alliance.
 
Back
Top Bottom