Trump administration contends it has no duty to return illegally deported man to US - The administration’s position suggests officials do not view the Supreme Court’s order as compelling them to seek Abrego Garcia’s return.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1744636599626.webp
A member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus holds a picture of Kilmar Abrego Garcia during a news conference last week. | Alex Wong/Getty Images


The Trump administration insisted Sunday that it has no legal obligation to arrange for the return of a Maryland man illegally deported from the United States, arguing that a Supreme Court ruling last week only requires officials to admit him into the country if he makes it back from a high-security prison in El Salvador.

Justice Department lawyers told a federal judge that they don’t interpret the Supreme Court’s Thursday ruling — that the administration “facilitate” Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s release — as obligating the administration to do anything more than adjust his immigration status to admit him if El Salvador’s government chooses to release him.

With El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele set to meet President Donald Trump Monday, DOJ attorneys argued the courts have no power to require the administration to engage with the Salvadoran government to reach a diplomatic solution. They contend such a potential order would amount to a violation of the separation of powers and an intrusion into what they allege is unfettered presidential power to conduct foreign relations.

“All of those requested orders involve interactions with a foreign sovereign — and potential violations of that sovereignty,” Justice Department attorneys wrote in a seven-page submission to U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis. “[A] federal court cannot compel the Executive Branch to engage in any mandated act of diplomacy or incursion upon the sovereignty of another nation.”

The administration’s position suggests officials do not view the Supreme Court’s order as compelling them to seek Abrego Garcia’s return. The Salvadoran native entered the country illegally around 2011 and had been living in Maryland. The Trump administration has admitted it deported him to El Salvador in violation of a 2019 immigration court order barring his deportation to that country. Though Abrego Garcia was denied asylum, a judge found he could not be sent to his home country because of a legitimate fear of persecution by a local gang.

The administration continued Sunday to flout a Friday order from Xinis to deliver “daily updates” to the court describing its efforts to return Abrego Garcia to the United States. Sunday’s update from Evan Katz, the assistant director of removal operations for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said the administration had “no updates” for the judge. A day earlier, in a similarly threadbare update, the administration turned to Michael Kozak, the State Department’s senior bureau official in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, who said Abrego Garcia was still alive in El Salvador’s CECOT prison.

The administration is also bucking demands from Abrego Garcia’s attorneys that officials detail the arrangement to ship hundreds of foreign nationals to a notorious prison in El Salvador. One of the Sunday filings insists those details are classified and could be subject to attorney-client and state secrets privileges.

“It would be inappropriate for this Court to hastily order production of these sensitive documents,” Justice Department lawyer Drew Ensign wrote.

The administration also said it would resist efforts by Xinis to demand testimony from officials about their thinking on Abrego Garcia’s potential return, saying such disclosures “could interfere with ongoing diplomatic discussions — particularly in the context of President Bukele’s ongoing trip to the United States.”

Still, the administration’s narrow view of its obligations under the Supreme Court’s ruling appears to up the stakes of a hearing Xinis has scheduled for Tuesday afternoon to assess the steps officials are taking to arrange for Abrego Garcia’s return.


Source:
 
Some updates (from the US Politics General)

DOJ releases new documents on Kilmar Abrego Garcia amid fight to bring him back to US
Link | Archive
I have attached the pdf from the Fox5 article . The only one that I was missing was the one where it explains how the MS-13 connection came about. As some may have suspected, there is more than "Chicago Bulls clothing". He was arrested because he was hanging out with confirmed members of MS-13.

ms13.webp ms13_2.webp
ms12_2.webp

Also, interesting bit. At the time of arrest, he was not fearing for his life about being returned
humanitarianabrego.webp

Edit - found source (link | archive)
Does anyone have a link to the protection order the wife has filed?
She has battered wife syndrome, and is defending him
"I acted out of caution after a disagreement with Kilmar by seeking a civil protective order in case things escalated. Things did not escalate, and I decided not to follow through with the civil court process. That is not a justification for ICE's action of abducting him and deporting him to a country where he was supposed to be protected from deportation."
Thankfully things did not escalate, she was hit only twice! (Link)
Vasquez recalled two times in 2020 that Abrego Garcia hit her.
"In November 2020, he hit me with his work boot," she wrote. "In August 2020, he hit me in the eye leaving a purple eye." Edit: cannot find the exact quotes, but there is the entire document below
  • Shouting abuse to her, with kid present
  • Reckless driving, with kid present
  • Throwing objects at wife
  • Hitting wife repeatedly
  • "I am afraid of being close to him"
  • "I have multiple photos/videos of how violent [sic] he can be"
1744987287331.webp 1744987353199.webp
 

Attachments

Last edited:
The Supreme Court does not dictate foreign policy. It has no jurisdiction in El Salvador, and no power to order Bukele. The man was never an American citizen, and he was always subject to a foreign power. The order is judicial overreach, and it's wrong.

Perhaps the judiciary should consider the implications of making unenforceable orders in cases that are outside their jurisdiction. It damages their credibility.
We're supposed to declare war on El Salvador to free the oppressed cannibal gang niggers now.
How dare you infringe on their rights to carve out still beating hearts you far right fascist.

El Salvador is going to have a lot of globohomo interest the next time they hold elections. Hopefully the gutting of foreign AIDS is enough to protect them.
Nayib "we like to do a bit of trolling" Bukele
Fucking legend
His MS13 knuckle tattoos being present in one of the photos is the funniest shit ever.
 
However, Xinis said the Supreme Court had made “very clear” that the U.S. government was obliged to work to release Abrego Garcia from custody in El Salvador.
We have district judges attempting to dictate foreign policy and none of the black robes see this as a massive issue of jurisdiction and separation of powers.

This petard needs to get hoisting sooner rather than later.
 
Well, we are heading to SCOTUS at a breakneck speed, as the 4th Circuit decided to go entirely off the rails in their latest filing. They denied Trump's motion to stay proceedings pending appeal, and said some truly insane shit. Starting with some free praise for the insane district judge.
1744987793270.webp
Followed up by a complete misstatement of the case history and basic facts:
1744987891772.webp
As we discussed, Garcia was never a resident and received ample due process in an immigration court and an appeals court. He's had more than his share.
1744988471192.webp
I'm starting to think this judges haven't even read the file. These issues were already adjudicated by the immigration courts, who have jurisdiction. Orders of withholding are at the discretion of the Executive, as are Foreign Terrorist Designations. These are not re-viewable by the District court.
1744988691285.webp
First, one attorney (since fired for incompetence) in an initial oral proceeding, does not the position of the government make. Secondly, Garcia is a foreign citizen in the custody of his home nation. The US Government and especially this court has zero jurisdiction. None, zilch, zero, nope, nada, can't do it.
1744988869541.webp
The context of facilitate this court claims it isn't bound by is the context of the legal term of art in the immigration context. You can't take the term of art from its context, then try to replace it with a different meaning and shove that meaning into the context. Even if you tried, facilitate is not proactive or external, it is complimentary to the actions of another. If I am getting a couch delivered to me, I can facilitate that delivery by sharing my phone number with the furniture store, being home at time of delivery, opening the door, taking up the rug, etc. This is different from me driving to their warehouse and loading it in my truck itself - that would be effectuating, ie to make it happen.

In the immigration context the term of art facillitate means that, if an illegal were to say present himself at the border, ICE/DHS would allow them entry for the purpose of showing up at their hearings and not put up any barriers to this. It does not include sending planes to whatever country they are in, or sending Seal Team Six to bust them out of a foreign prison.
1744989220610.webp
No shit, thats what you're doing now.
1744989276232.webp

Here we see how crazy they are; the means, the laws, are made by CONGRESS. The judiciary does not get to make up laws and legislate from the bench, but this court think they are able to do so. Insane.
1744990002945.webp
I can't tell if I'm reading a court opinion or some puff piece from CNN. There was due process, there was no valid order preventing this deportation. No process involved with Garcia could be used on an American citizen, period. This is just hysterical attempts at gaslighting.
1744990106729.webp

This is ridiculous on its face. A sovereign nation has no responsibility to extradite its citizens to a foreign nation. And likewise the US has no right to demand they do so. Even so, for such matters as criminal extradition, those are party to treaties which are the sole purview of other government branches - not the courts.

Further, Garcia does have recourse of law - in El Salvador, where he is a citizen and currently held!
1744990547988.webp

:smug:"Dude we just ignored all the facts, all the law, and acted like you're our bitch that has to do whatever we say. We just ordered you to invade another country and snatch up a terrorist gang member to let loose on the citizens. Like bro, why are you mad?"
1744990889832.webp
This part is especially rich. Who is going to end up with egg on their face, the executive trying to keep illegal invader gang bangers out of the community, or the justices pitching bitch fits and throwing tantrums with gavel banging histrionics?

Roberts needs to borrow some balls from Thomas, and start smacking down these district courts. This is insane.
 
I'm starting to wonder if the white house is just trying to honey trap as many democrats as possible before showing their irrefutable evidence he's a legit true and honest Ms 13 member

All these democrats including some with presidential aspirations are getting behind this guy and I don't see how you come back from wanted to return an actual gang member back to the us and referring to him as a resident
 
Well he’s no longer in the violent death camp and in nicer accommodations now I guess

Kilmar Abrego Garcia told senator he is no longer being held at notorious Salvadoran prison​

U.S. Sen. Chris Van Hollen says the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia transcends one man’s immigration status; it’s about the constitutional rights of every American. But Republicans and the Trump administration dig in on keeping Garcia locked up abroad.

 
someone else said it first but it’s psycho that Dems are focusing on this wife beating beaner and not the tariffs.
 
tattoo.webp


Abrego's knuckle tats. In case you can't tell the MS13 itself is an annotated interpretation.
 
I'm starting to wonder if the white house is just trying to honey trap as many democrats as possible before showing their irrefutable evidence he's a legit true and honest Ms 13 member

All these democrats including some with presidential aspirations are getting behind this guy and I don't see how you come back from wanted to return an actual gang member back to the us and referring to him as a resident
It'd be a pointless trap. The democrat base does not care about truth. You could have 4k footage of this thug skinning a baby alive, and 99% of them wouldn't even hear about it because it never showed up on their feed.
 


The libtards are continuing to try to mock and deny it but I think weight of evidence is shifting to that this guy is or was involved in gangs to some extent for a reasonable objective person. I was sort of on the neutral side on the question of gang affiliation being of the position that he just shouldn't be here as an illegal but like what sort of normal person gets tats like that? lol.
 
Back
Top Bottom