Trump administration contends it has no duty to return illegally deported man to US - The administration’s position suggests officials do not view the Supreme Court’s order as compelling them to seek Abrego Garcia’s return.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1744636599626.webp
A member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus holds a picture of Kilmar Abrego Garcia during a news conference last week. | Alex Wong/Getty Images


The Trump administration insisted Sunday that it has no legal obligation to arrange for the return of a Maryland man illegally deported from the United States, arguing that a Supreme Court ruling last week only requires officials to admit him into the country if he makes it back from a high-security prison in El Salvador.

Justice Department lawyers told a federal judge that they don’t interpret the Supreme Court’s Thursday ruling — that the administration “facilitate” Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s release — as obligating the administration to do anything more than adjust his immigration status to admit him if El Salvador’s government chooses to release him.

With El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele set to meet President Donald Trump Monday, DOJ attorneys argued the courts have no power to require the administration to engage with the Salvadoran government to reach a diplomatic solution. They contend such a potential order would amount to a violation of the separation of powers and an intrusion into what they allege is unfettered presidential power to conduct foreign relations.

“All of those requested orders involve interactions with a foreign sovereign — and potential violations of that sovereignty,” Justice Department attorneys wrote in a seven-page submission to U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis. “[A] federal court cannot compel the Executive Branch to engage in any mandated act of diplomacy or incursion upon the sovereignty of another nation.”

The administration’s position suggests officials do not view the Supreme Court’s order as compelling them to seek Abrego Garcia’s return. The Salvadoran native entered the country illegally around 2011 and had been living in Maryland. The Trump administration has admitted it deported him to El Salvador in violation of a 2019 immigration court order barring his deportation to that country. Though Abrego Garcia was denied asylum, a judge found he could not be sent to his home country because of a legitimate fear of persecution by a local gang.

The administration continued Sunday to flout a Friday order from Xinis to deliver “daily updates” to the court describing its efforts to return Abrego Garcia to the United States. Sunday’s update from Evan Katz, the assistant director of removal operations for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said the administration had “no updates” for the judge. A day earlier, in a similarly threadbare update, the administration turned to Michael Kozak, the State Department’s senior bureau official in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, who said Abrego Garcia was still alive in El Salvador’s CECOT prison.

The administration is also bucking demands from Abrego Garcia’s attorneys that officials detail the arrangement to ship hundreds of foreign nationals to a notorious prison in El Salvador. One of the Sunday filings insists those details are classified and could be subject to attorney-client and state secrets privileges.

“It would be inappropriate for this Court to hastily order production of these sensitive documents,” Justice Department lawyer Drew Ensign wrote.

The administration also said it would resist efforts by Xinis to demand testimony from officials about their thinking on Abrego Garcia’s potential return, saying such disclosures “could interfere with ongoing diplomatic discussions — particularly in the context of President Bukele’s ongoing trip to the United States.”

Still, the administration’s narrow view of its obligations under the Supreme Court’s ruling appears to up the stakes of a hearing Xinis has scheduled for Tuesday afternoon to assess the steps officials are taking to arrange for Abrego Garcia’s return.


Source:
 
Personally my main issue of this isn't the guy himself, but the fact that Trump and the Administration is getting pretty cavalier about sending "homegrown criminals" to El Salvador. Maybe they'll do it, maybe they won't, but no one should be under any illusions that it is becoming a possibility. I'm skeptical of what they consider to be "homegrown criminals" who deserve to be in El Salvador. Knowing this Administration's priorities, anyone who critiques Israel.
 
However, a different judge would grant Abrego the withholding order over the fear of persecution from Barrio 18.
These judges are batshit insane.

“NOOOO YOU CANT HECKIN DEPORT THIS GANGBANGER, HE MIGHT GET KILLED BY OTHER GANGBANGERS!!1!”

Yeah, that’s a feature not a bug. One less potential illegal immigrant.
 
If I were Trump my approach would be to say that if I have to confront a foreign nation with demands then in my judgement I have to be prepared for the possibility that the issue may escalate into a military confrontation. In that case, to proceed I would seek a declaration of war from Congress to make absolutely 100% sure everything is on the legal up and up. So, I would tell the judge that my executive judgement is that I can't proceed without action from Congress first. Then, I would ask the judge to either vacate the order or to issue a followup order compelling Congress to vote in favor of the declaration. Now, of course, the judge doesn't actually have the power to compel Congress to take a certain foreign policy action, but it's not like that sort of thing stops them, you know?

And then, I would have the Republican leaders in Congress note that they can't possibly follow such an order as it has no support from their constituents, and so they need the judge to either vacate the order or produce yet another order this time compelling the American voters to elect representatives who will implement the foreign policy the judge has ordered. Now, of course, the judge doesn't actually have the power to do that, but that hasn't stopped him before so why rule it all out?
 
In any case, he is now in the custody of the government of El Salvador, and a court cannot compel the president to conduct or not conduct a certain foreign policy. The District Court has no power to order the president to do anything, and neither does the Supreme Court.
The textbook definition of "moot" and yet the courts keep on litigating it..... because they just can't put down the TDS.
 
Last edited:
Personally my main issue of this isn't the guy himself, but the fact that Trump and the Administration is getting pretty cavalier about sending "homegrown criminals" to El Salvador.
This comment does not make a lot of sense for a citizen of El Salvador, who has no other citizenship

There is something in this case potentially somehow concerning. However, this is a bad case to make an example of. These judges, the journos, and the NGOS amplifying the story really never heard or did not understand the point of "the boy who cried wolf"

There is a balance of being "tough on crime", where you don't want to end up in a totalitarian regime. However protecting the non-existing rights of a non-citizen who has a criminal past does not create any useful precedent to protect citizens who are criminals

In more insane news, this crazy bitch is doubling down and just granted Garcia the judicially adjudicated terrorist a motion for discovery into the foreign affairs and negotiations of the Executive Branch
The Supreme Court did say that the Gov should be ready to disclose what they have done. However, reading the motion from discovery, it seems that it goes beyond what the SC has ordered.
Also, the SC has also ordered to define what they mean by "effectuate". The discovery motion has a whole paragraph of dictionary definitions for "facilitate", but none for defining "effectuate"
The intended scope of the term “effectuate” in the District Court’s order is, however, unclear, and may exceed the District Court’s authority. The District Court should clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs. For its part, the Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps.

Hope Sean covers this! Has any decent lawtuber covered it?
 
The Supreme Court did say that the Gov should be ready to disclose what they have done.
The term used was "what they can" and with "due deference [to the executive]", which was the polite, weak-ass way Roberts was trying to tell Xinis to respect the clear separation of powers issue. Which she promptly ignored, and is overstepping now, because she doesn't give a shit and Roberts won't take a tough stance. The Courts have zero business poking into the exclusive, plenary powers of the Executive to conduct foreign policy.
 
Which she promptly ignored, and is overstepping now,
Agreed. They really cannot stop themselves from making a martyr out of Trump!
I dislike Trump, but I dislike people like this more.

Also, I watched a few minutes of the conference with the San Salvador president, and it seems they did ask him to his face, in front of cameras, if he intended to return the innocent-baby-angel-MS13 and the answer was a clear no. Actually contacting the president of a different country to ask him directly about the return of their own citizen is more than most countries would do and more than what is afforded to most citizens who are arrested while on holiday to a foreign country.
Let's all protest for random guy who got arrested because he brought drugs into the Philippines!!
 
What part of the constitution gives the judicial branch the right to give immunity to a foreign national?
View attachment 7229968
Legislative and Executive branch which passed a law allowing people to not be deported to a country if they know full and well they won't come back alive if sent there.

But you guys are also still under the assumption that Immigration Judges fall under the judicial branch.
 
>B-B-But the court said-
The court can say whatever they like and be wrong about it until they're blue in the face. He's not an American and he has no rights here. He came into this country illegally and left far too late.
 
I like how the Judge wants daily updates on what we're doing to get the gang banger back when the President of El Salvador was on TV saying "we will not release him"

That's where it ends. We are at the limits of any facilitating until and unless that policy reverses, which if it were to happen? Would be a matter of foreign policy and national security that is likewise outside jurisdiction of any US court to compel. (I.E. - don't call us, we'll call you).

The DOJ attorneys even pointed this out and the Judge still said it wasn't good enough.

They should just email the Judge a video of that presser every day from now on because that's all we're going to be able to do.

The Federal Judiciary needs to be brought down from low orbit and reminded of where they are in the flow chart. There's no excuse for these rulings, they're outrageous even by biased Judge standards.
 
Last edited:
The textbook definition of "moot" and yet the courts keep on litigating it..... because they just can't put down the TDS.
To use one of the leftist judiciary's favorite words from 2020 and 2021, laches. He's gone. Outside jurisdiction. There is no recourse the courts can compel.
 
Personally my main issue of this isn't the guy himself, but the fact that Trump and the Administration is getting pretty cavalier about sending "homegrown criminals" to El Salvador. Maybe they'll do it, maybe they won't, but no one should be under any illusions that it is becoming a possibility. I'm skeptical of what they consider to be "homegrown criminals" who deserve to be in El Salvador. Knowing this Administration's priorities, anyone who critiques Israel.
We should be sending our criminals to El Salvador forthwith.

>B-B-But the court said-
The court can say whatever they like and be wrong about it until they're blue in the face. He's not an American and he has no rights here. He came into this country illegally and left far too late.
Yep. All this bleating about fucking DUE PROCESS for illegal aliens is bullshit and is literally a delaying tactic so the Dems can pass fucking amnesty.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yep. All this bleating about fucking DUE PROCESS for illegal aliens is bullshit and is literally a delaying tactic so the Dems can pass fucking amnesty.
They have no shot at this. It is unpopular and would be political suicide to even put forth when they don't have either House or Senate.

What they DO have a shot at? And are trying to do?

Is rile up / scare the public enough with a manufactured Constitutional Crisis that they win the midterms and cockblock Trump for the latter half of his Presidency at worst, or at best? Get him impeached.
 
The DOJ attorneys even pointed this out and the Judge still said it wasn't good enough.

They should just email the Judge a video of that presser every day from now on because that's all we're going to be able to do.
They attached the transcript in a status update:
1744852389008.webp
The one from today I think is going to be copy-pasted until this bitch has the case taken from her.
1744852464211.webp
 
Libs in 1985: US out of El Salvador!
The same libs in 2025: US, go into El Salvador!

I hope Bukele deports Van Hollen as an undesirable alien immediately, and threatens to incarcerate him if he refuses to leave...in CECOT.
 
Judge Penis has ordered expedited discovery on this case.

Her orders are that all Trump officials named in the suit or who responded to the suit must make themselves available for the defence to depose them by no later then April 21. The plaintiffs get 15 questions and 15 interrogatories and can get more just by asking for them.

If they do not give "sufficiently responsive answers" then "this court will apply sanctions until they do".

IE: Judge Penis is hopping mad that the Trump team told her to go pound sand so she's going to keep pushing for answers that they cannot give so she can then start slapping them too with contempt orders. Yup just a SOP Democrat appoint judge using her power to punish people who are on Team Trump.

Despite telling her that the gang banger is no long under US control she is demanding his return ASAP. "I will require the Trump Administration to use what ever process is necessary to expedite the return of this person who was unjustly deported"

Unjustly Deported....she's not even pretending to care about the facts anymore.

Quote:

However, Xinis said the Supreme Court had made “very clear” that the U.S. government was obliged to work to release Abrego Garcia from custody in El Salvador.
“I’m cleaving as closely as one can cleave to the Supreme Court,” the judge told Ensign. “There is, in my view, nothing to appeal. Now, we get to the facts.”
“We’re going to move. There will be no tolerance for gamesmanship or grandstanding,” the judge said. “There are no business hours while we do this. … Cancel vacations, cancel other appointments. I’m usually pretty good about things like that in my court, but not this time. So, I expect all hands on deck.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/...-seek-return-of-wrongly-deported-man-00291942
 
What a hill to die on. Are the Democrats really this desperate, and this was the best attack they could launch on Trump?
 
Back
Top Bottom