Yeah, this points to something that always bothered me: the assumption in this thread that he had a "live-in" nanny. Not sure if that was just something PPP or somebody else said that just stuck, but do we have actual proof she was truly "live-in"?
If she was, that means:
-Cuck Cave- 1 bedroom
-Nanny- 1 bedroom
-5 kids- 2 bedrooms. I would assume that the 16 year old had his own room, meaning one room for the remaining four, which seems insane to me, even for Nick, especially when that would have been the situation even before he started his love affair with la cocaina. Is that really what the assumption is when people say "live-in" nanny, five kids in two rooms?
Sorry if this has been beaten to death already but I find this thread difficult to keep up with, even with highlights as I haven't had much time for Kiwi stuff lately. And to this day, people keep saying "live-in" nanny like it is a known fact? It seems to me, though, that she was more of a driver than a real nanny? Why pay for a live-in nanny who doesn't clean shit? You don't need to give them free room and board PLUS salary to get someone to schlep your kids around.
Our Husband gives me a headache with this bullshit.