💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 40.2%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 93 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 163 23.7%

  • Total voters
    687
He might plea out just to stop it from going into evidence. It's crystal clear that I need consent from anyone, not that I won't get it.
Not a practicing lawyer, but my read of the law seemed to indicate that if the footage was to be introduced into court as evidence, it could then be released as well (without consent).
 
Nick, have a cake to celebrate the return of the children.

View attachment 6286219

I do not condone or endorse crossing the line into IRL alogging, but seeing Nick's reaction to this cake would be something, and the hypothetical thought makes me chuckle uncontrollably.

Whether or not he gets an Alfred Plea

Alford. Alfred works for Batman, and Alford work for 'bad men' like Nick.

If grandparents move in they'll see first hand that Nick and Kayla sleep till afternoon, leaving kids to figure out breakfast and lunch however they can by themselves. They will feed them and clean them and do house chores while 2 useless sloths are either sleeping or literally coping and lamenting their legal situation during conscious hours.

I eagerly await the unintended consequences of Nick's big brain manouvre.

The in-laws move in and give him grief about their living style and/or pressure Kayla into being more of a real wife and mother.

Also, the 'damn kids' and their school activities! The sheer amount of driving that he has to do and the accompanying stress push him to stream less and snort more cocaine.

TL;DR Nick has not found a healthy way to resolve his own issues, so they will simply return and lead to another explosive blow out again. We just need to wait.

And actually, it's not as clear cut as you're saying.

View attachment 6286265

I'm pretty sure I've heard some very serious allegations that Aliesha Sweep lied under oath and that the police literally planted fucking evidence in his bedroom. Were there any other acts of malfeasance reported by Nick Rekieta about the conduct of officers that night?

I can testify that I have heard disturbing rumours about the integrity of the Kandyohi County police force or CPS agents' integrity. I, as a concerned member of the public am not sure that if I had to interact with them that all laws would be followed. I have heard multiple reports of misconduct by a lawyer in good standing with the bar that have reinforced these beliefs.

The best thing to dispell these concerns would be a totally transparent disclosure of the interactions of these agents with the esteemed lawyer.

He might plea out just to stop it from going into evidence. It's crystal clear that I need consent from anyone, not that I won't get it.

Do you think thr police would consent after the case is resolved, as a final resort?
 
And actually, it's not as clear cut as you're saying.

View attachment 6286265

I'm pretty sure I've heard some very serious allegations that Aliesha Sweep lied under oath and that the police literally planted fucking evidence in his bedroom. Were there any other acts of malfeasance reported by Nick Rekieta about the conduct of officers that night?
He has "hinted" that the drugs may have been planted. Trying to say it by not saying it, so to speak. Chrissie Mayr interview for example.
 
Were there any other acts of malfeasance reported by Nick Rekieta about the conduct of officers that night?

Has he outright alleged that the warrant was served improperly or that the officers conducting his vehicle stop lied to him in any way? Might be a fun weekend project for an enterprising kiwi to see if they could find a statement about either of those
 
Where is the COURT ORDER sending the Rekieta Kids back home? If Nick feels like this was a WIN he would be plastering that document everywhere.

Nick NEVER Lies, remember
 
And actually, it's not as clear cut as you're saying.
Okay that's interesting. I was only looking at the BWC statute itself which would seem to narrow it to people present (including county employees) but it appears the agency does have the ability to reclassify as public.

The actual statute says "widespread rumor or unrest" but Nick has made arguments in his cases that he is such a famous and prominent guy with hundreds of thousands of subscribers he needs to be treated differently. :story:

Were there any other acts of malfeasance reported by Nick Rekieta about the conduct of officers that night?
Yes. He claimed that the officers conducting the raid knew the probable cause for the search was "bullshit".

 
Possible. I do think that eldest son will talk some shit to April at some point.

:really: What the fuck is this shit with the wood beads? Are you getting high off them?

Son: It's a rosary, Dad.
:really: Oh... well April said she wants to use them next.

Son: No! Fuck off.
:really: Fine! Whatever. They're not even big enough anyways you little bitch.
 
If grandparents move in they'll see first hand that Nick and Kayla sleep till afternoon, leaving kids to figure out breakfast and lunch however they can by themselves. They will feed them and clean them and do house chores while 2 useless sloths are either sleeping or literally coping and lamenting their legal situation during conscious hours.
Kayla's parents live locally. They'd have to have been exceptionally uninvolved grandparents to be unaware that care of both the house and the children was sorely lacking.
 
I’m glad he’s got his kids back and has another shot of redemption. I’m being :optimistic: but I really hope he doesn’t fuck this up again.

I do believe most people deserve a second chance. Pedophiles and child killers do not deserve any form of redemption.
 
I think CPS has made a huge mistake giving those children back, he's shown no acknowledgement that he has done anything wrong and will only go back to doing what he was doing. He's still getting tattoos and fucking the maid. My only guess is that he'll fuck up soon after and lose them again.

I think he spoon fed his daughter cocaine. I have no idea why that drug test was not considered.
 
MNPublic Records might very well be Nick. You see, he may have been ”leaking” things such as the test results in order to get the case tossed on a technicality.
No.

Nick is concerned about his image more than anything. He arguably cares about his image more than he cares about getting away completely scot-free on the criminal shit.

What MPR "leaked" about the 9 year old was so damaging to his reputation, that it rattled even many of Nick's most die-hard supporters. More people were furious about that than they were with him simply being arrested for possession in the first place.

There is no way in hell Nick wanted that to get out. His plan was to lie about the conduct of his case with impunity, under the belief that it would be extremely difficult to disprove any of what he was claiming. He almost got away with it too.

Furthermore, MPR was critical of Nick in his commentary accompanying the doc drops in a way Nick could never bring himself to be. It was too on the nose.

I may be wrong but this is the kind of manipulation that I would expect from someone like Nick.
You're wrong. He's manipulative AF, but what you are suggesting requires a level of intelligence Nick does not possess. Nick's manipulation is dumb, and that becomes more clear the more one is subjected to it. Trust me, I know from personal experience.

I'd sooner believe he go with a gay op involving posting FAKE information here than I believe he would do what MPR did in leaking the truth. The truth MPR was sharing is brutal.

I thought we determined 2000 pages ago that the likely outcomes were:
  • Children would be returned with supervision.
  • Probation / suspended sentences.
We did.

I don't think anybody feels felted by the idea he's gotten supervised custody of his children. That was expected to happen at some point.

EDIT: Missing word.
 
Last edited:
It is very possible, just not possible in every case. Nick has the advantage of being somewhat famous. If it wasn’t for this being talked about on public forums such as this one it wouldn’t be possible to pull this off. Nick did make the argument recently that the child’s test results being released was improper and that those results should be stricken from the record because of it. I would very much like to see what the ruling was. Nick getting custody of his kids back could only be the result of winning on a technicality. And if what he told Camelot is true, that he got them back because the State couldn’t prove the drug use, this would make sense.
This is the most retarded shit I've read in at least minutes.
 
Back
Top Bottom