💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.6%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 40.2%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 92 13.4%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 163 23.8%
  • Total voters
    686
AltisticRight said:
In all of this, I feel bad for Carol. Imagine your comfy office wagecuck cubical job in some buttfuck nowhere county with a name some might confuse as Japanese city being thrown into a frenzy because that drug-addicted swinger non-practicing lawyer skeleton freak with a YouTube channel you often hear in whispers got into a major whoopsie. Now you have to deal with incomplete FOIA requests one after another.
Click to expand...
That's what I always think about any time you see any big case happen in some shithole little town. Literally no part of the system is designed to handle more press than the local TV station. It's not like it's some big city where they have whole media teams that handle those sorts of things.
 
Agent Snigger said:
I’m not able to do this myself atm, but if someone replaces John Hancock’s signature on the Declaration of Independence with Josh’s, I would be very appreciative
Click to expand...
Gotcha:

jewmon dec.png


Also, the classic novel:

flower for jewmon.PNG
 
Balldo's Gate said:
The above was already saved as a draft but yes, that's exactly right.

But it's not just that the guy is a Barneswalker, since there are pre-existing links between White and Barnes, it is plausible that Rekieta was referred by Barnes to White. I don't know if Nick has confirmed or denied that, but it seems likely.
Click to expand...

Fairly certain Barnes has taken credit for it.

Captain Manning said:
The motion that Hardin filed (with attached affidavits) is asking for audio-video recordings of the proceedings. Nothing that would allow that to happen. No two way communication between the public and the court.

In fact, the potential for disruption if people were to have to attend is (rather shrewdly) cited as a reason WHY the motion should be granted.

Hardin's filing is actually brilliant. Especially in light of Nick's attorney's bitching about what happened during Nick's initial appearance (see the transcripts MPR dropped). He's further hoisted by his own petard in mentioning Nick's views on trials needing to be public.


Lol.

Part of me also thinks that Barnes would want this to grift off of. I know he's not technically in charge, but he's got a lot of influence over Nick right now.

I think if Nick opposed this, it would cause friction between Barnes and Nick. Nick wants to try and save his reputation and concoct a narrative. For him, not having this trial filtered solely through him would be bad. Whereas Barnes, might not give shit how this plays out as long as he gets money and attention. It's not his head on the chopping block. It's Nick's. He could always just scream about government corruption if it doesn't go his way and he'll retain enough dumb rubes that believe him.
Click to expand...

Nick will point to someone favorable who is covering his case if we get televised coverage that is non-exclusive. Otherwise he will just seethe.
 
eDove said:
Man, people are being torn apart for their handwriting in this thread. First a cop, then a descendant of a cop.
Click to expand...
Soon new users will have to submit a signature of their username for handwriting analysis to the community for approval before gaining valuable posting rights. Having one's signature roasted can be like a rite of passage... now sign the dotted line, please. Come on, Cynthia! Write all your usernames.
mindlessobserver said:
Have we determined the fate of the dog yet? There has been precious little mention of the dog in any of this.
Click to expand...
We'll find out through their divorce documents. Either Nick will fight for custody of the dog or its remains. Plot twist: Dog's hair is sent away for drug analysis and comes back positive. The grandparents get custody of the pooch.
TrainWreckWatcher said:
Oh my I hope someone uses Nick's words of "trials should be broadcast" against him in the petition to do this.
I really, really do.
And I hope the judge has a sick sense of humor.
Click to expand...
I really do hope so. This judge will really need it when Nick's Balldo comes into evidence... particularly when it has to be explained what it was used for in this case... sending prayers, etc.
 
AnOminous said:
My signature is a deranged scrawl that doesn't even look like a signature. It looks like a seizure.
Click to expand...

Ah, so you are indeed a doctor or lawyer.

My signature is also scrawl, although in my case due to simple sped-like inability to write any gud.

Anyway, this signature clearly confirms that Null is none other than the burger werewolf himself, George Motz

images.jpg

The coincedences are too great to ignore. His instatiable lust for meat and cheese combinations. The iconic patriotism of freedom and burgers. It's all starting to make sense.
 
Last edited:
AnOminous said:
My signature is a deranged scrawl that doesn't even look like a signature. It looks like a seizure.
Click to expand...
Same. It started out pretty nice (at least legible), and then it became first initial-scribble, last initial-scribble, and then eventually devolved into nothing that even resembles English letters.

Honestly I'm just not that concerned with someone somehow fucking with me by faking my signature. The seemingly monthly emails I get from some service I signed up to years ago telling me their database got stolen, which for some reason was stored in plaintext, is far more concerning.
 
JackoVerde said:
When the footage comes out, Nick is gonna have to skip town. Maybe in Mexico with Ralph.
But then again the terms of his sentence may mean he’s no allowed to leave the country.
Click to expand...
He might go to the hood since he’d abandon his kids at that point and ruin his “career”. Be an honorary black man and might be accepted there.

AnOminous said:
My signature is a deranged scrawl that doesn't even look like a signature. It looks like a seizure.
Click to expand...
My cursive is gay. I’ve been told I sign my name like a doctor does. I use big strokes, so doing things like writing a capital J makes it look like an unnecessarily giant noose.
 
Null said:
listen the conditions under which i had to get something notarized in minnesota made signing difficult ok
Click to expand...
I understand but the next time you need your mom to forge your signature for you, you should explain that she has to write your name, she can't just sign "Josh's Mom" like it's a permission slip.
 
holyhandgrenade said:
>2024
>not just signing things with a simple x
SHAME
Click to expand...
Interestingly that’s actually perfectly legal. I was watching a lehtos law video on YouTube about that subject awhile back. Basically if you make a mark on a piece of paper with the intention of signing it, it’s perfectly valid. Draw a cat if you want to. Though I guess it would make an interesting case if the signature was disputed.
 
NotADrunkLawyer said:
Interestingly that’s actually perfectly legal. I was watching a lehtos law video on YouTube about that subject awhile back. Basically if you make a mark on a piece of paper with the intention of signing it, it’s perfectly valid. Draw a cat if you want to. Though I guess it would make an interesting case if the signature was disputed.
Click to expand...
As long as they can prove that you were physically there and agreed to whatever you were signing it's cool.
The X is a time honored tradition.
 
Why do we still use written signatures? If you can draw something as retarded looking as mr moon did and have it still work clearly it doesn't work for non repudiation. Cryptographic signatures have existed for years now.

Anyway I would kill for signed kiwi merch with that signature on it.
 
gagabobo1997 said:
Why do we still use written signatures? If you can draw something as retarded looking as mr moon did and have it still work clearly it doesn't work for non repudiation. Cryptographic signatures have existed for years now..
Click to expand...
Maybe there’s a chance in the future where someone can ramp up A.I. generated technology that clones someone’s written name and fake it to make it look like said person in question wrote it.
 
holyhandgrenade said:
As long as they can prove that you were physically there and agreed to whatever you were signing it's cool.
The X is a time honored tradition.
Click to expand...
I’ve probably signed 100 documents where it would actually be hard to prove I was there and signed it. A lot of stuff doesn’t require a notary** and they might not have security camera footage or something, if the signatures not identifiable I think it’d be somewhat difficult to prove that X is you.

(** also notaries are kinda bullshit too. Everyone I know seems to have someone who will notarize shit without really verifying identities and such)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom