What Is “Vabbing” And Does It Really Work? - The newest development in the art of seduction.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
There’s a new pseudoscience craze sweeping the internet, and it involves inserting your fingers into your vagina and then wiping them on your skin – all in the name of seduction. Known as “vabbing”, the trend has been touted as a cheaper and more alluring alternative to perfume, but can smelling like a vagina really make you more attractive?

The what, how and who of vabbing​

Vabbing has blown up recently thanks to a now-deleted TikTok video posted by influencer Mandy Lee. Describing the technique, Lee recommends the use of two fingers and a “relatively clean” vagina, and says that the best approach is to simply “get up there” before transferring the intimate secretions to exposed body parts like the wrist, neck, or behind the ears.

“I swear if you vab, you will attract people, like a date, a one-night stand. Or you’ll just get free drinks all night,” she says, before revealing that she first heard about vabbing on the Secret Keepers Club podcast. Despite the removal of Lee’s video, the craze has taken off on TikTok, with numerous other users taking to the platform to promote the sticky practice.

Elsewhere, sex educator and author Shan Boodram has written about the benefits of wearing vaginal fluids, which she says “can serve as a love potion,” especially if they are applied around the time of ovulation.

Why vab?​

According to Boodram, vaginal secretions may contain chemical messengers known as copulins. These volatile fatty acids are known to stimulate sexual arousal in some male primates, so the assumption here is that by smearing oneself in yoni juice, women may have a better chance of attracting a mate.

More generally, the rationale behind vabbing centers around the idea of pheromones, which are chemical signals that some animals secrete in order to affect the behavior of other individuals of the same species. In some cases, pheromones are used to get members of the opposite sex in the mood for love, with arguably the most potent being a compound called bombykol. Secreted by female silk moths, this sexy signal sends males wild with lust for some insect intercourse.

Taking their cue from the animal kingdom, many perfume manufacturers use synthetic pheromones in their products, which they market as being capable of boosting the wearer’s attractiveness. Vabbers, however, prefer to use their own brand, which they say is more effective.

What does the science say?​

While it’s well established that many species use pheromones for sex, there is no solid evidence to suggest that humans produce these chemical messengers or are capable of responding to them. That may be because the vast majority of pheromone research has been conducted on animals rather than people, although it’s worth noting that a 2012 review of all human studies found that the evidence to support our use of these signals is “weak”.

Having said that, some research has hinted at the possibility of natural body odors influencing our sexual allure. For example, one study involving more than 500 people found that participants’ relationship satisfaction and desire to procreate was influenced by the nature of their partner’s major histocompatibility complex (called HLA in humans), which is a genetic component of the immune system.

Because molecules related to the HLA are released in saliva, sweat and other bodily fluids, this finding could be interpreted as evidence that our liquid secretions have the power to get other people’s juices flowing.

Other research has shown that some women do produce copulins in their vaginal fluid, and that the concentration of these acids increases during the first half of the menstrual cycle before dropping after ovulation. In one study, men who were exposed to copulins rated both themselves and women as more sexually attractive, which is encouraging news for vabbers.

However, to date, no human pheromone has been definitively identified, so it’s a bit of a stretch to claim that vabbing sends men the way of the male silk moth.

Article Link

Archive
 
Starting to think this might de a memeOp like when 4chan invented freebleeding and dumb feminists actually went and did it.
I never heard of any dude smearing dick cheese over themselves to get panties wet.
I remember they were selling little pheromone bottles like perfume, but I heard about cheapstakes using their own ball sweat.

Anyway, nothing is more off putting for me than a girl that smells like she hasn't taken a bath in a while. And the whole "vaginas are self-cleaning" is complete bullshit, wash your coochie.
 
Okay there must be a glitch in the matrix because this is some weird fucking deja vu, I have heard "vabbing" before but it was mocking it as a stupid fucking thing and I can't remember where I heard it but now it's being pushed again like perineum sunning
 
this is fucking gross, first off humans are not primal anymore so this is just putting pussy on your neck like a weirdo.
the fact these girls come up with this shit means they're so horny they can't think straight.

this will just have guys thinking you smell nasty or that you're a lesbian cause your face smells like pussy.
in some places you can be fired if someone says you smell like sex.
people know what sex smells like and it doesn't attract mates like the sluts think it does, it sooner makes people irritated.

side step, will the new thing be spreading stds by wiping pussy on your neck and getting a guy to hicky it clean ??? ew what the fuck
anyway, i don't know if i can even call these things girls or women anymore, this is just being a gross bitch.
a lot of girls can be gross, this just makes girls that take a shower look like gold in comparison.

someone that simply showers will get more dates since everyone is ditching hygiene.

usually guys like when girls don't wear pads, they praise tampons even though tampons make girls sick and can kill them by harboring bacteria.

guys have ALWAYS been mehhhh about a girl that wears pads even if tampons can fucking kill them. calling girls grannies when they wear pads and shit like that.
guys are stupid jerks to girls and guys don't know anything about pussy other than trying to put their dick in one all the time like a bunch of fools.
they think they know something about pussy because they like fucking pussy, but that doesn't mean shit tho lmao. hur durrrrrrr guyssszzzzzzzz.
it's why all of these new age men want to be gay, because they're fucking terrible at being men.

and these girls are terrible at being women lmao
since she's already ok with putting pussy on her face, i assume her future is being a lesbian, not getting a man like she thinks it is.
 
Last edited:
So a woman can do it and it's fine

But you rub your smegma on your neck ONE time...
idiot, you put it on her neck to mark the territory and scare of other males. "uh she smells like dick".

otoh with clown world people might start thinking she's a troon.

I remember they were selling little pheromone bottles like perfume, but I heard about cheapstakes using their own ball sweat.

Anyway, nothing is more off putting for me than a girl that smells like she hasn't taken a bath in a while. And the whole "vaginas are self-cleaning" is complete bullshit, wash your coochie.
I was mostly joking, I remember the pheromone stuff, but not dude's being their own supply.
 
I feel like the sex whose valid relationship strategy can be "Bring beer, be naked," can get away with attracting a mate even when they do a lot of dumb shit. As if women have to work to get laid or something.
 
Well it's fucking disgusting and pseudoscience is what it is.

Anyway, nothing is more off putting for me than a girl that smells like she hasn't taken a bath in a while. And the whole "vaginas are self-cleaning" is complete bullshit, wash your coochie.
The vagina is the muscular tube which is self cleaning. The vulva needs to be cleaned or it will get smegma around the clitoral hood building up.
In women and girls, smegma may build up between the labia and around the hood of the clitoris. In most cases, it is nothing to worry about, and good hygiene practices should take care of the buildup.
In females, smegma is found between the labia, the lips which protect the vagina, and around the clitoral hood, which is at the top of the labia minora.
It can cause pain if not removed:
The inability to retract the foreskin, called phimosis, is well understood in men. Urologists are familiar with this issue and how to treat it. A similar phenomenon occurs in women, referred to as clitoral adhesions or phimosis. The hood of the clitoris can become inflamed and even stuck (adhered) to the end of the clitoris, making the hood immobile. This can cause pain when the clitoris swells, but the hood is stuck down. Also, normal skin secretions can become trapped under the adhesions. Smegma is the fancy name for the oil secretions of the skin. (I’m pretty sure the word “smegma” is one of the only things I remember from my sub-par sex education classes in school.) Smegma trapped in an adhesion can cause more pain, especially if it causes inflammation/irritation or forms keratin pearls.

But you rub your smegma on your neck ONE time...
Girls have smegma too but I think they mean just vaginal fluids, which is still gross.
 
Last edited:
This article is dumb. They're trying to say Humans are apparently the only mammals not attracted to pheromones because there is no scientific knowledge of it.

That's like saying Humans don't like butts because there haven't been enough butt studies.

Yeah.. Seriously. Nobody even tries to study it because of the potential "scary" implications. Small attempts to have shown that at the very least there is "something" going on unexplainable without factoring something in. But sadly nothing to prove beyond doubt.

This belief is just as silly and nonsensical as the idea that humans are somehow devoid of natural instinct or programing.
 
Yeah.. Seriously. Nobody even tries to study it because of the potential "scary" implications. Small attempts to have shown that at the very least there is "something" going on unexplainable without factoring something in. But sadly nothing to prove beyond doubt.

This belief is just as silly and nonsensical as the idea that humans are somehow devoid of natural instinct or programing.
copulins
pheromones
The thing is that, even though we tried many times, we were never able to isolate (find) any human-made pheromone, ever. We can do it for many creatures with ease, but were never able to with humans.
Humans do not appear to have any of the organ necessary to either emit pheromones, or perceive pheromones. It's simply a sense that we lack.

If there was some legal chemical that you could spray on yourself to make yourself more attractive to the opposite sex, it would be a billion dollar industry bigger than the perfume industry, and everyone would be on that stuff. Huge corporations would spend millions on R&D to be able to sell you stuff that works.
It's not, because it's just bullshit. Just like how Venus being in retrograde helping with finding your soulmate (except if he's a Scorpio).
 
you know, when I was growing up, the culture of the time was pretty adamant that men are sex-crazed monkeys who will stoop to anything just to get it in, while women are largely innocent of this animal urge and instead seek only the purity of love and genuine intimacy. you can see this reinforced all over the place: movies where the average guy is portrayed as a debased horn dog set out to satisfy their urges at any cost, victimizing every woman they come across with their disgusting sex penis, often in contrast to a heartful Mr. Right who just wants "the real thing"; the very concept of "Mr. Right", implying that rather than being a matter of personal matching, there is a "correct" personality type for men to aspire to (and it's not horny); gonzo porn where the woman being a "slut" is part of the advertising pitch, the implication being the woman being featured is some edge case who actually wants the dick - making it somehow deviant and therefore hot - which also comes with a second implication of some kind of corruption or degeneracy on her part, while the guys are just doing what guys do. as a man, the implications of this suck ass - expressing any kind of sexual interest, unless you do it exactly the right way to exactly the right person, is instantly interpreted as being a disgusting creep and turns people against you real fast. men must be seen to be completely asexual until their urges are made valid by female desire, which - as #MeToo established - can even be revoked long after the deed is done, with social consequences similar to rape. the assertion that this is a breed of ideological insanity particular to new wave feminism is dismissed as misogyny and now, symptomatic of some deeply problematic political sympathy (i.e. "far right").

more recently, there's been a growing trend where women expressing their sexual desire is actually empowering and liberating. I often think about that fucking Wet Ass Pussy song in relation to this topic, because that song is just as retarded and disgusting as any other heavily niggerfied track about muh dick and fucking bitches in the club or whatever, but where polite society normally treats nigger music as an inscrutable alien phenomenon to either be ignored (since white people were gatekept from joining the culture) or adopted as a virtue signal, Wet Ass Pussy was hailed as a Stunning and Brave victory for repulsive shit-brained retards Megan Thee Stallion and Cardi B on behalf of women everywhere. just look at this amazing quote from this awful GQ article:

Rapper/singer CeeLo Green came out of the woodwork with an interview in the U.K. publication Far Out, in which he criticized the pair for “salacious gesturing to kinda get into position” and asked, “it comes at what cost?” After facing backlash for his comments (many pointed out that he was accused of sexual assault in 2013), he took the Notes app apology route, writing, “I acknowledge them all as powerful, beautiful and influential women…and professionals.”

note the loaded terminology being used here: he "came out of the woodwork" like some kind of unwanted pest; his full quote in the interview being cited is deliberately abridged to make him look sexist ('"I get it, the independent woman and being in control, the divine femininity and sexual expression. I get it all,” for Green, he can’t help but ask, “it comes at what cost?”'); he "faced backlash", meaning he was hit with justified pushback for saying that; "many pointed out" the sexual assault thing, as if it's an external fact he needs to be corrected on; then his apology is characterized as a perfunctory "taking the X route". summation: idiot says bad thing, idiot gets dragged for saying bad thing, idiot makes dumb apology for saying bad thing (that he's probably not actually sorry for anyway). one remark gently alluding to the song being vulgar got him instantly shut down for being an evil sex-crazed hypocrite and forced to kiss the ring. btw, this is the "sexual assault" CeeLo was accused of:

Singer Cee Lo Green pleaded not guilty Monday to furnishing the party drug Molly to a woman last year while dining at a downtown Los Angeles restaurant.

[...]

Green, whose real name is Thomas DeCarlo Callaway, is accused of providing Ecstasy, also known as Molly, to the 33-year-old woman in July 2012.

A Los Angeles Police Department investigation into the singer began almost a year ago after the woman said he put the drug in her drink as they dined.

The woman said she woke up to find herself naked in the 39-year-old singer’s bed. But after two rounds of investigations, prosecutors declined to file sex-related charges against Green, citing insufficient evidence.

once again, a woman revokes consent after the fact and the man is instantly treated like a criminal. this dude was subjected to two investigations without any burden of proof on the accuser, and even though he was cleared of everything except the molly, the mere fact that he was ever accused of anything is hung around his neck so it can be used as a weapon to punish him for daring to insinuate that any expression of female sexuality could be considered unseemly. this is the double standard we live under. when men are horny, it's victimization. when women are horny, it's heroic. and that's the space this retarded article lives in. incels buying pheromone cologne to brainhack women into fucking them is disgusting and desperate. women smearing their filthy Pussy Cream on their bodies is just us girls tryna get that D. fight the power, y'all.

ree-pepe.gif
 
Last edited:
I misread the title as "vaping" and I thought it was about those fake cigarette things that are fucking everywhere. Like seriously, I can toss a boulder in any given direction and hit at least a dozen people who have one.

TBH this is pretty disgusting too, like I want some random bitch's stank ass vagina juice smeared all over random surfaces, nobody wants to catch chlamydia from sitting at a booth in a public restaurant or something.
So femcels are going for the pheromone shit? they didn't see all the nerds failing at that during the early 2000's?

And no, your tuna scent isn't going to get you anybody except japanese pantsu vending machine enthusiasts.
In relation to my misreading the title, there is a tuna or sardine vape juice out there. What's next, vomit, feces, and semen?
 
Why? Why is this a thing?

And who came up with this?

I have so many questions. And being a germaphobe I fucking hate this, I don't want to have to consider the last person to touch the handle of the freezer or the head of cabbage at the grocery store had smeared their vaginal discharge all over their hands and neck before going out shopping.
 
Back
Top Bottom