Consoomers / Consoomer Culture - Because if it has a recogniseable brand on it, I’d buy it!

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Something on my mind recently - is it okay for people with very small kids (i.e. babies or toddlers) to push their interests on said kids, or is it another type of consoomer behaviour? For example, buying a shirt with your favourite band or vidya on it for your infant, who can't even talk yet - their brain isn't exactly developed enough to understand and appreciate what's on their clothes. On one hand it's not going to do them any harm, on the other - isn't that forcing your own interests on your kid who's going to grow up to be their own fully fledged individual with their own likes and dislikes?

The latter could very well be a bit of a woke argument - I can see both sides, but idk, I'd much rather see people introduce their children to things they personally enjoy than just expose them to whatever's popular at the moment simply because everyone else is doing it or it's what's most readily available - that's how you create the next generation of rabid Disney freaks who'll buy every piece of Mickey Mouse shite they see.
 
Yes, they do want to push their interests on them. I've read about consoomers wanting to pass down their collections of plastic stuff to their kids not taking into account the fact that their kids won't give a shit about it and look at it like junk one day. They think that all of this mass produced stuff will be passed down through generations of their families. In reality it will just end up a landfill soon enough. The fact is that new generations typically don't want the old shit passed down through older generations unless it's really special and even then they don't care in most cases. In fact most newer generations rebel against the previous generation by purposely not wanting the same hobbies or collections as their parents. Most stuff that is inherited is literally just thrown out by the next generation because they don't give a shit about someone else's stuff, there will be new cooler stuff for them to care about.
 
2manycats said:
Something on my mind recently - is it okay for people with very small kids (i.e. babies or toddlers) to push their interests on said kids, or is it another type of consoomer behaviour? For example, buying a shirt with your favourite band or vidya on it for your infant, who can't even talk yet - their brain isn't exactly developed enough to understand and appreciate what's on their clothes. On one hand it's not going to do them any harm, on the other - isn't that forcing your own interests on your kid who's going to grow up to be their own fully fledged individual with their own likes and dislikes?

The latter could very well be a bit of a woke argument - I can see both sides, but idk, I'd much rather see people introduce their children to things they personally enjoy than just expose them to whatever's popular at the moment simply because everyone else is doing it or it's what's most readily available - that's how you create the next generation of rabid Disney freaks who'll buy every piece of Mickey Mouse shite they see.
Click to expand...
Angelic 2 the Core said:
Yes, they do want to push their interests on them. I've read about consoomers wanting to pass down their collections of plastic stuff to their kids not taking into account the fact that their kids won't give a shit about it and look at it like junk one day. They think that all of this mass produced stuff will be passed down through generations of their families. In reality it will just end up a landfill soon enough. The fact is that new generations typically don't want the old shit passed down through older generations unless it's really special and even then they don't care in most cases. In fact most newer generations rebel against the previous generation by purposely not wanting the same hobbies or collections as their parents. Most stuff that is inherited is literally just thrown out by the next generation because they don't give a shit about someone else's stuff, there will be new cooler stuff for them to care about.
Click to expand...
I think when the kid it little it's fine, but you need to teach kids autonomy from an early age, too. That means while you the adult decide which choices the kids can have available, you let the kid decide between the choices you've already paired down. I think that's a hard concept for consoomer-parents. They don't understand they aren't raising children, they're raising future-adults. As adults trapped in adolescence themselves, it can be tricky.
 
NoReturn said:
I think when the kid it little it's fine, but you need to teach kids autonomy from an early age, too. That means while you the adult decide which choices the kids can have available, you let the kid decide between the choices you've already paired down. I think that's a hard concept for consoomer-parents. They don't understand they aren't raising children, they're raising future-adults. As adults trapped in adolescence themselves, it can be tricky.
Click to expand...
I guess another way to word it would be - is there much difference between putting your kid in a Nintendo onesie because you like vidya, and plonking them down in front of Disney or Paw Patrol regardless of your own feelings on said media or its quality/educational value, just because "kids like it"? Been contemplating this a lot because this discussion is one I know my significant other and I are going to have when we get around to having kids, and as much as I want to teach them to appreciate the world outside of popular culture, there are certain things we both enjoy and wouldn't mind letting our kids experience, so I'd like to know where the line is drawn between consooming and appreciation.
 
Angelic 2 the Core said:
Yes, they do want to push their interests on them. I've read about consoomers wanting to pass down their collections of plastic stuff to their kids not taking into account the fact that their kids won't give a shit about it and look at it like junk one day. They think that all of this mass produced stuff will be passed down through generations of their families. In reality it will just end up a landfill soon enough. The fact is that new generations typically don't want the old shit passed down through older generations unless it's really special and even then they don't care in most cases. In fact most newer generations rebel against the previous generation by purposely not wanting the same hobbies or collections as their parents. Most stuff that is inherited is literally just thrown out by the next generation because they don't give a shit about someone else's stuff, there will be new cooler stuff for them to care about.
Click to expand...
Even well-made products can become junk if not cared properly/if society and trend changes.

Take old wooden furniture for exemple. Some of it is extremely well-made and can last for centuries, but nowadays it's not trendy. You need to care for it properly so insects like termites don't destroy it, it may not be considered fashionable to have it as home decor, and if you live in a small space, you may not have the room to keep it. So Granny's table or chest may have fetched a good price back in 58 but nowadays no one wants it.

You don't know what the futur holds.
But i am pretty sure 99% of consoomer's crap will not become treasure. We are in for interesting times, people won't have as much money to spend to frivolous crap.
 
2manycats said:
Something on my mind recently - is it okay for people with very small kids (i.e. babies or toddlers) to push their interests on said kids, or is it another type of consoomer behaviour? For example, buying a shirt with your favourite band or vidya on it for your infant, who can't even talk yet - their brain isn't exactly developed enough to understand and appreciate what's on their clothes. On one hand it's not going to do them any harm, on the other - isn't that forcing your own interests on your kid who's going to grow up to be their own fully fledged individual with their own likes and dislikes?

The latter could very well be a bit of a woke argument - I can see both sides, but idk, I'd much rather see people introduce their children to things they personally enjoy than just expose them to whatever's popular at the moment simply because everyone else is doing it or it's what's most readily available - that's how you create the next generation of rabid Disney freaks who'll buy every piece of Mickey Mouse shite they see.
Click to expand...
Parents especially good ones want pass on what they consider being good in this world to their kids. Traditions, language, food, values, ethics, skills and yes entertainment. Stories are one way we learn and come together, there is nothing wrong with parents starting their kid off with what they like.

This isn't forcing your intrests on your kid because none of this means the kid isn't their own separate person or can't choose something different in future. There are endless choices in the world, some witch are very bad for you, and you have get started with something to figure out what you like. That's why parents put stuff on their kids until kids are old and experienced enough to choose themselves. Kids often find beloved hobbies and other passions trough their parents example or guidance without anything sinister about it. That only comes if the parent refuses listen objections, doesn't evaluate if the kid is being harmed or doesn't allow the kid try out something different.
 
2manycats said:
Something on my mind recently - is it okay for people with very small kids (i.e. babies or toddlers) to push their interests on said kids, or is it another type of consoomer behaviour? For example, buying a shirt with your favourite band or vidya on it for your infant, who can't even talk yet - their brain isn't exactly developed enough to understand and appreciate what's on their clothes. On one hand it's not going to do them any harm, on the other - isn't that forcing your own interests on your kid who's going to grow up to be their own fully fledged individual with their own likes and dislikes?

The latter could very well be a bit of a woke argument - I can see both sides, but idk, I'd much rather see people introduce their children to things they personally enjoy than just expose them to whatever's popular at the moment simply because everyone else is doing it or it's what's most readily available - that's how you create the next generation of rabid Disney freaks who'll buy every piece of Mickey Mouse shite they see.
Click to expand...
This does remind me of another board elsewhere, years ago, where a man posted about when he got sick, and in a hospital, he told his daughter not to throw all his shit out, she could sell it. The father collected old video game systems and shit. She just replied, "Dad, I'll just throw all that shit out". He had to explain to her, that she could buy a car with the funds, however, she even then, with her father very ill, just let him know, up front, she could not be bothered with that. it was too much trouble. it's trash. Also caused me to make sure I had good homes for some of my goodies, as I know to most family, they'd just not want to be bothered.
 
rdrr said:
This does remind me of another board elsewhere, years ago, where a man posted about when he got sick, and in a hospital, he told his daughter not to throw all his shit out, she could sell it. The father collected old video game systems and shit. She just replied, "Dad, I'll just throw all that shit out". He had to explain to her, that she could buy a car with the funds, however, she even then, with her father very ill, just let him know, up front, she could not be bothered with that. it was too much trouble. it's trash. Also caused me to make sure I had good homes for some of my goodies, as I know to most family, they'd just not want to be bothered.
Click to expand...
Video games can still be brought to like, Half Price Books. Even with a big collection, you could just walk in, plop it down, and they’ll call you in an hour with an offer. That’s a real shame to throw it out right now.

Though in 50 years, yeah, there will be a glut of very old games where the hardware is degrading, and it won’t be worth dick. Just think about the value of Elvis Presley stuff today vs. the past.
 
I remember years ago, clearing out some stuff from older relatives, that had been handed down in a way. Something I ended up giving away, was some mas produced China, that was not worth selling on the bay and similar since there was too great of a chance of it getting broke. Other people were selling on there, but, it wasn't worth it to me when factoring in time to pack, mail, and also chance of things being broke in transit. I did think for a while, about how that family member spent time acquiring it, and it was something else, packing those plates and similar, to give away to charity.

What I found that I hold onto more, from that relative, are the things that have personal etchings on them, from their time at work, and just in general personalized.
 
Seriously? She's not even cold yet...

Screenshot_20220908-165801_Gallery.jpg
 
Sarcastic sockpuppet said:
Even well-made products can become junk if not cared properly/if society and trend changes.

Take old wooden furniture for exemple. Some of it is extremely well-made and can last for centuries, but nowadays it's not trendy. You need to care for it properly so insects like termites don't destroy it, it may not be considered fashionable to have it as home decor, and if you live in a small space, you may not have the room to keep it. So Granny's table or chest may have fetched a good price back in 58 but nowadays no one wants it.

You don't know what the futur holds.
But i am pretty sure 99% of consoomer's crap will not become treasure. We are in for interesting times, people won't have as much money to spend to frivolous crap.
Click to expand...
It's all true. Something I see the Boomers neglecting, however, is the matter of space. I've seen so many Baby Boomers who just assume their child/children will take their "stuff". Sometimes it's just an assumption, other times the parent will come right out and say "I want to downsize so you need to buy a home soon." They either don't understand, or don't care, that they haven't taken the steps necessary themselves to ensure the outcome they want can actually happen.

Amber the Hedgehog said:
Parents especially good ones want pass on what they consider being good in this world to their kids. Traditions, language, food, values, ethics, skills and yes entertainment. Stories are one way we learn and come together, there is nothing wrong with parents starting their kid off with what they like.
Click to expand...
Agreed, until the kid is of an age where they can make those decisions themselves, it's your job as parent to narrow down their options. You can do that from the time they're literal babies, too.
E.g. Instead of asking a baby "What do you want to eat?" (they don't know, they're a stupid baby) you can do things like offer them choices between options you have already pre-chosen or narrowed down for them as their parent. "Do you want apple or banana?"

Pissmaster said:
Video games can still be brought to like, Half Price Books. Even with a big collection, you could just walk in, plop it down, and they’ll call you in an hour with an offer. That’s a real shame to throw it out right now.
Click to expand...
There are secondhand game shops that do the same, the only problem is proximity, similar to the above.
If you are within a reasonable distance of a shop, then it's worth the trip. If, however, it's hours and hours away, then you'll need to factor in things like cost of gas, opportunity cost of your time, etc.

Pissmaster said:
Though in 50 years, yeah, there will be a glut of very old games where the hardware is degrading, and it won’t be worth dick. Just think about the value of Elvis Presley stuff today vs. the past.
Click to expand...
Elvis shit is my new favorite go-to when talking about this stuff. Thank you guys for bringing it to my attention.
 
I'll accept the clock stickers if this has been asked, but is there a situation where consooming is okay?

I realise there were things I did in the past that these days would be considered consoomer behaviour. A good example would be the way how at one time every Pixar was a must watch, so much so that reviews were pointless. It wasn't until Wall-E that cracks started to show and by the time Turning Red came out, no one gave a shit. You could make similar cases for first party Nintendo games before the Wii.

I guess the difference is that back then the companies in question were known for a consistent high standard of quality, but I that could be me making excuses.
 
Judge Dredd said:
A good example would be the way how at one time every Pixar was a must watch, so much so that reviews were pointless. It wasn't until Wall-E that cracks started to show and by the time Turning Red came out, no one gave a shit. You could make similar cases for first party Nintendo games before the Wii.
Click to expand...
It's fine to be excited about something when they keep putting out hit after hit, as long as you're genuinely enjoying it. Consoomer behavior is continuing to watch Pixar movies even after they started going downhill, forcing yourself to say they're great and get excited over the next one because you care more about the sense of community surrounding them than the movies themselves.

So, If you're bored of them, yet you say "The Good Dinosaur was great, I don't care what the haters say" because you feel like if you don't, you'll lose friends and get kicked out of your Pixar fan group, that is classic consooming. You're denying your honest feelings about it, which is a way of dehumanizing yourself.

Judge Dredd said:
I guess the difference is that back then the companies in question were known for a consistent high standard of quality, but I that could be me making excuses.
Click to expand...
It's fine to like stuff, just don't be a simp for a corporation and feel an obligation to buy whatever they put out, regardless of quality.
 
The Great Citracett said:
Seriously? She's not even cold yet...

View attachment 3686271
Click to expand...
There’s something comforting about the fact that the only thing this Funko owner will know, is that you can only feel compassionate when vividly imagining the Queen looking like a bug eyed, dead eyed Funko toy and not a real person.

They seriously look at historical people as just toys that will collect dust and nothing else in this new digital age of consumerism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom