- Joined
- Dec 15, 2017
It probably was, but never had a mining GPU fail on me after 2014? I would say at least 80% of miners undervolt their GPUs to keep the asic quality consistent.
Sony hate thread
- Thread starter gangweedfan
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2020
SONY: "Buy our PS5 and all the (not) games we have for it!"
Also SONY: "Hey so turns out our shit is also for PC, so rather than make actual good PS5 exclusives, here's two pices of expensive shit to help you play those games better"
>$899 4K resolution monitor with a 144-hertz refresh rate
>$529 1080 pixels monitor with a 240-hertz refresh rate
>wireless headset for $299 with noise cancellation and synthetic leather, along with a pared down $229 wireless headset (no leather or noise-canceling) and a $99 pair of wired headphones
They're high as fuck if they think anyone is going to un-tighten their belt in this economic crisis and go "OH BOY, GOTTTA HAVE THOSE THINGS!!!"
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2017
Honestly just buy a pair of good studio headphones, like the Shure 840, for 150 bucks and a cheap wired mic for 50 and you should be golden
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2018
Just read the Nintendo hate thread, and holy shit. Marissa has the ability to ruin a Sony hate thread by playing Sony Defense Force and ruin a Nintendo hate thread by going overboard in autistic Nintendo hate. I'm actually impressed.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
Well that's not true either, they revoked both Dual Princess and Super Seducer after they both wound up on the Steam ban list. So they're clearly using some metric on what's allowed on their own platform. Dual Princess was banned from Steam the same day it released on the switch and a few days later they pulled the Japan version and then later the US one. Both CERO and ESRB would not be in tandem since they both have different guidelines and are not in direct communication with each other. The game was supposed to be put back up, but that was 6 months ago which to a very long time and usually means they're having to rework major portions of the game or they were shown the door/getting the corporate runaround until they give up.
Sony's policy isn't geared towards general nudity and it more centered around getting rid of lolicon/underage. It's why martha is Dead had the face peeling scene turned non-interactive because they don't want interactive sex or graphic violence being depicted happening to minors.
It's why Senran Kagura's dressing room interaction thing was removed but nothing else was, because SK has characters who look like they're under 18. Meanwhile all 4 Legend of Heroes games were left untouched because they feature nothing like that.
Sakura Succubus 5 had to alter stuff for the 5th VN because it specifically featured an under age character as the main draw and it was specifically for the PS4/PS5 version they had to do this with, since the dev was already kicked off of Microsoft's platform a few releases ago, but Sony allowed Sakura Succubus 1-4 to be on their platform while Microsoft did not and those 4 VNs had no real changes from the switch version IIRC.
Last edited:
I stated this time and time again, console fanboys are defensive consoomer piss ants.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
I don't hate Nintendo as a company, I just hate the fans. There should be some distinction and nuance.
There's different tiers to the items, it's similar to what they did with Bravia and their TVs. Corsair's own series of headphones run around 300 bucks so, it's the norm.
Other companies are still putting out TVs and Monitors for 2-3k. Samsung has a whole array of TVs with gaming specific features that can cost around that much.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2018
There's really no nuance, just stop shitting up threads.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
I'll consider your opinion and put it up for review, but I can't promise anything.
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
Super Seducer was a freaking meme game designed to rile people up and create controversy. It also got pulled from Steam, if I remember correctly. I've never even heard of Dual Princess or the controversy surrounding that.
Sony's censorship policy is well known and goes all the way back to the Playstation era, to the point where Japanese gamers called it the "Sony Check". And no, its not geared towards lolicon shit. Its in regards to sexuality and violence/gore in general:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
Censored Gaming is a click bait channel that is about as reliable as Clownfish TV.
The parent company in Tokyo was the one who instituted the policy. The Japanese CEO was the one who even made the statement saying so.
The Policy was created in the wake of #Metoo and did not exist prior, they did not want young girls to be depicted as sexually exploited. Any and all previous Sony polices had zero bearing on how they rolled it out. The games they targeted specifically were to remove stuff that went over the line when it came to under aged looking characters.
People may try and shoved Koei Tecmo and Capcom in as examples but those had nothing to do with Sony's policy, those were each Company's own decision.
Having a game also be a meme game had zero effect on it either. Playstation Store had a host of stuff from independent controversial creators they create stuff that looks like it came from Adult Swim. They host games from creators that were also kicked off of other platforms.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
That's called Ad Hominem Moira. Calling someone clickbait doesn't refute the info presented. Since Censored Gaming actually presents examples and evidence, I'm going to trust him over the Sony fanboy who will literally say anything to make his favorite company not look bad and has presented objectively wrong information multiple times and refused to acknowledge it or even double down when called out on it.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
It's literally a clickbait channel though. It's like taking what Yellowflash says seriously. They source stuff from 4chan or 2chan.
Sony says #MeToo, streaming behind stricter limits on sex in games
Concerns over "legal and social action" against sexually explicit games have caused it to revamp guidelines on what it allows on its platforms
This came from Tokyo itself, which means Sony Group as a whole made the decision. This was also to factor in that these games would be seen on streaming services and they did not want the association.
Since then it's been pretty much under age characters that have been the brunt of this policy. The policy was created around the time the new CEO Kenichiro Yoshida came in.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
Nigga, taking you seriously is like taking Yellowflash seriously. Censored Gaming isn't a clickbait channel. He actually post information on legitimate examples of censorship, with context, comparisons between censored and non-censored versions, etc., unlike you who pulls bullshit out of their ass daily.
None of this contradicts anything I've said.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
And I'm telling you that their policy was geared towards under aged characters, you disagreed. So I posted evidence.
This came out since around 2018 and it's been fairly consistent.
Product Placement
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
Got the mid tier of the new PS+ and have to say it's not that bad, I skipped over many big games and only cost me like $25 for 200 days of it. Not worth it for everyone but it is for me due me wanting to play games like Death Stranding, Ghost of Tsushima, Stray, Little Hope, Guardians of the Galaxy, Few Ys games, Disaster Report 4 and few others.
But upper tier with the "classic" games is a joke, ps3 games are streaming only, PS2 emu is still not great and they haven't even fixed the issues with it when it comes to PS5, PS1 line up is really small and PSP line up is just 2 game.
But upper tier with the "classic" games is a joke, ps3 games are streaming only, PS2 emu is still not great and they haven't even fixed the issues with it when it comes to PS5, PS1 line up is really small and PSP line up is just 2 game.
SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
Ask me about how teen girls deserve to be abducted
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2021
2 PSP games? What's even the point.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
There's more coming but much of the PSP library was released during a transitory phase.
You see originally the PS3 did not have trophies or achievements. The PSP also shared that trait, quite a few PSP games were re-released for the PS4 and Vita with trophy support later on and with better performance.
Much like stuff like the upcoming Trails From Zero/Trails of Azure, they're going to use the later versions of the games and not the original PSP ones. Crisis Core is also another example of this.
Falcom is also looking to bring older titles like Ys OiF and Ys 7 to newer hardware and those were again originally PSP titles.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Kind of have to because it would look bad that Steam has them but the new PS Plus doesn't.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
Honestly I just hope that it means that 5 finally gets released. Oath is Ys 4, and Memories of Celceta is 3, and Ark is still Ys 6.
The fact that 10 is supposed to take place after 2 but before 3 could really set the series up to have many experience it properly if they do the re-releases right.