YouTube Commentary Community - You know shit's about to get real when the cartoon avatar crosses their arms!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Tom is to Destiny as Gunt is to Metokur. Eventually Destiny will go against Tom on something and Tom being a spurned fanboy will sperg out.
 
It really is the point of no return when your E-Daddy says something fucking retarded. Of course Tom being the naïve kid he is, decides to double down because he has never had it backfire on him before. Can't wait to see how long he sucks Destiny's dick before he changes his mind yet again for the only thing he really cares about, income. Maybe people will finally realize that Tom literally says whatever will get him views while also not committing to any real principles.

Also guaranteed Destiny is on some kind of upper. You don't talk like someone set you to 2x speed and not at the very least have an Adderall prescription.
 
Last edited:
1721590736191.png
Does anyone even know what a Tomboy is?
 
crinklefry said:
Adding blowsblacks to the future troon-out list
Click to expand...
I think Augie did say out of all his commentary friends he thinks Boblax would be the most likely to come out as some sort of gay.

Found the clip

Rewatched, his other guesses:
Tipster is too old to be gay or anything (lol)
John Swan is likely (I think John has said he's bi since)
Edwin is a given (vindicated)
Nick will come out as bisexual to get in Destiny's good graces (incoming)
 
Urbicide said:
I think Augie did say out of all his commentary friends he thinks Boblax would be the most likely to come out as some sort of gay.

Found the clip
https://youtube.com/watch?v=5oJrT4PPcj4
Rewatched, his other guesses:
Tipster is too old to be gay or anything (lol)
John Swan is likely (I think John has said he's bi since)
Edwin is a given (vindicated)
Nick will come out as bisexual to get in Destiny's good graces (incoming)
Click to expand...
Wasn't this also around the time Nicholas Deorio came out as non-binary then quickly took it back due to no one gave a shit?
 
Seeing the commentary community on the whole dr disrespect debacle is pretty funny because it shows how delusional they are for thinking companies are beholden to the same standard of morality individuals are, even if i do not really particularly care for the situation itself.

Some people (willy and tom, for example) thinks twitch needs to make a public statement of sorts about what exactly happened so people can properly condemn (or not) dr disrespect being a fucking pedo, because otherwise he can just deny the allegations and continue streaming, and that twitch not explicitly exposing said facts is some huge coverup plot, when all of that fails to recognize the most basic truth about private companies: They don't have to. They cut off the pedo for being a creep, as he should, and they did not want to deal with public image hit that would be the pedo dr being the face of the platform.

Twitch has no need to do anything else, and is under no obligation to continue poking into a situation that might, at best, not matter at all since they already cut off the pedo and already paid whatever they did, and at worst it might blow back in their face by further proving how shit the moderation is on the platform (big news, i know).

Seeing "drama" youtubers repeatedly ask for concrete proof to something that was intentionally swept under the rug by the big corpos and not being able to cope with the fact that their debate bro logic is not how things happen irl is pretty funny, hilarious even.
 

This is pretty pointless but worth a small chuckle. We all know the iiluminaughtii drama and lawsuits she's filing against people, with less people knowing that her lawsuits are going nowhere and the judge is tired of her bullshit for incorrectly filing / labeling / responding to things.

The judge has sided with Oz Media in almost everything at this point, it's clear Oz is going to win the lawsuit, and yet because the judge picked one small thing in the lawsuit to disagree with Oz about, which is saying that what Oz did was more of a private business matter and not a public matter (which it was, he jumped on a public shitflinging contest with his own private matter, it's inarguable), iNabber can't understand the difference and spergs out.

iNabber ~knows better~ despite being from the fucking UK and knowing nothing about U.S law and decides, unironically and deadpan serious, that "the judge clearly has not done their research" and "doesn't understand youtube culture", "the judge does not understand how the youtube community works" and "they clearly have not done their background research into everything".

Commentary faggots never cease to amaze me in how little logical skills or life experience they have.
 
Last edited:
When will these morons finally learn that you can be correct, overall, and still get small details wrong? Every one of them seems to think you either 100% dunk or you miss every shot and I've never understood it.
It doesn't matter if the judge calls out one small detail, in the grand scheme.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom