Culture Your Table Is Ready. The Clock Is Ticking. - Restaurants are enforcing some strict time limits — whether or not dinner is finished.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
By Megan Krigbaum
7:00 A.M.

1723579870670.png
Illustration: Kate Dehler

Earlier this summer, I met up with friends at the latest restaurant-that’s-more-like-a-bar on the Lower East Side. As they handed out our menus, our server reminded us with a tone of gentle but unwavering conviction: We needed to be out in 90 minutes. We raced through dinner — cocktails, a dozen plates to share — and in the end had time left over. (We ordered a bottle of wine to max out our minutes.)

I’d seen what happens to diners who blow their deadlines. Tables had been getting the pink slip in Brooklyn a few weeks before at an otherwise-cozy spot in Fort Greene. I was seated next to a couple still picking at the bones of their whole fish when a manager asked whether they planned on staying for dessert. “We’re going to need this table back shortly,” she said. Off in a corner, a three-top got the boot during their last round of drinks.

For as long as anyone can remember, servers have nudged New Yorkers along, faux-casually asking “Can I get you anything else?” and dropping checks as soon as customers set down their spoons. Now they’re being more blunt about it: Firm time limits are presented on reservation apps (Bar Contra, which opened this month, states on its OpenTable page, “Your reservation will grant you 90 minutes in one of our tables”), they’re mentioned at host stands, and they’re openly reiterated whenever diners get a little too comfortable after the crème brûlée is cleared.

Everyone has had the experience of walking into a restaurant without a reservation and discovering that, yes, there’s a table available but the restaurant will need it back at a certain time for someone with a reservation. That’s easier to stomach than being told the table you’ve reserved well in advance nevertheless comes with a stopwatch.

Many in the industry, I discovered, still aren’t quite ready to talk about it on the record (one person called it “a nuanced dance,” another asked to be kept anonymous after we’d spoken). Practitioners of this movement — which include, among others, the Four Horsemen, Atoboy, Coqodaq, Eel Bar — are a particular style of restaurant that is casual in premise but run with the rigidity of a fine-dining establishment. They have an impressive choreography to their service to ensure they flip each table every hour and a half, seating the entire dining room three times per night. “If we don’t get those three turns, we don’t stay in business,” says Guy Gladstein, a managing partner at Figure Eight in the West Village. The 50-seat spot has an average guest check of around $65, Gladstein tells me. “That last turn is what’s keeping us going,” he says. (There, tables of one-to-three people are capped at 90 minutes; four or more people get two hours.)

Restaurant technology is such that streamlining and tracing the clockwork is possible via Resy and the point-of-sale system Toast, but the job of making sure groups actually leave still comes down to staff members. “A masterful server is dictating the pace without the guest feeling it,” says Amanda McMillan, general manager of the Four Horsemen. There isn’t much wiggle room: Everyone has to show up on time and order within a few minutes of sitting down. The kitchen can’t hit any snags that delay the dishes, and a warm bottle of Chablis can’t go into an ice bucket for 15 minutes to chill before it’s poured. “If there is a strict timeline that must be adhered to,” McMillan says, “it’s the restaurant’s job to manage that — if the restaurant can’t hit the mark of 90 minutes gracefully, that is on them.”

Of course, if the restaurant does its job and diners still don’t get the hint, less subtle tactics may be required. Gracefully convincing people to vacate a table requires quite a bit of skill, and with the perception that restaurants are pricier than ever, it becomes more difficult. At the Four Horsemen, if a table orders extra wine or just runs long, the servers negotiate with the host to stretch time or move the party to the bar or to Nightmoves, its sister spot next door. No matter what, the restaurant needs its two-tops back after two hours max. “That’s how long,” McMillan says, “it reasonably takes to have a nice dinner with us.”

Source (Archive)
 
I regularly hang out with people for 2-3 hours or more at a restaurant, so I'd be absolutely livid. Don't take this lying down. Seriously, nobody should accept this and everyone should make a scene about this. That's not what restaurants are for.
I have been to restaurants where I was not told there was a "time limit" and the waiter started saying that our table was booked for another group and we had to leave soon.

That is what makes me not want to go back. If someone tells me in advance, with a slot of 90 min, I am okay with that because I can choose if I will want to stay for 90 min or if I will want to stay for longer.

I think it also depends on what you do for 3 hours. Are you just sitting there chatting? Are you buying drinks / food? I can see it from the point of view of a restaurant that wants to do at least two rounds that if people just sit at a table for one hour without ordering anything after their 1dish/person meal
 
I think it also depends on what you do for 3 hours. Are you just sitting there chatting? Are you buying drinks / food? I can see it from the point of view of a restaurant that wants to do at least two rounds that if people just sit at a table for one hour without ordering anything after their 1dish/person meal
Frankly, I don't give a rats anus. I'll sit there for four hours if I want over coffee. It's not my problem. If you want to kick me out after two hours, then all I have to say is that it's your tip to lose. The thing people seem to forget is restauranteurs aren't just a service industry, they're a hospitality service industry. Kicking people out isn't a good hospitality and if you want to engage in that practice then don't be surprised when your tip is $0.

"But wahh, wahh Wurmple, what about all those poor servers who don't make much money??? That tip is their livelihood! It's not their fault the manager tells them to kick you out. Wahh wahh, stop being selfish". - Some Betacuck probably

I don't give a fuck about the servers. Why? Because it's not my job to give them a liveable wage. It's their bosses job to give them the chance to earn a liveable wage. If their boss tells them to kick me out and they don't get a tip as a result, I'm not the one who did that. Their boss did. And guess what? Your boss does not give a fuck if you make a liveable wage. So if you work for a restaurant that engages in this practice, it is your duty as an employee to tell the boss to go fuck himself and go somewhere that you can earn a liveable wage. It is not your obligation to sacrifice your earnings for the boss's bottom line. You can choose not to. If you're a waiter, the boss doesn't pay you a liveable wage. Those tips are YOUR money, not his. If his policies are costing you tips, then you need to speak out against his policies. It's not like the mask mandates. There's no government pressing fines down his throat. There are a hundred other restaurants in the city of equal quality that don't force their employees to do this. If your boss makes you do this, you should complain and if that doesn't work, leave.
 
Last edited:
I don't see how this can possibly be a surprise to anyone. This is industry standard and has been for literally decades. It just isn't always explicitly advertised. You've never eaten at a restaurant in your entire life that doesn't do this, its also the basis for how the reservation system works
 
In a polite society, this kind of rule wouldn't be needed, but there are way too many retarded assholes out that there that just refuse to leave, even after the restaurant has closed. You're cutting into the restaurant's profit if you stay too long, so no shit they want you out after a certain amount of time.
 
I regularly hang out with people for 2-3 hours or more at a restaurant, so I'd be absolutely livid. Don't take this lying down. Seriously, nobody should accept this and everyone should make a scene about this. That's not what restaurants are for.


Tipping is for the birds. We used to stay at restaurants for 4-5 hours a night, racking up a $300-400 bill on the regular for 7-10 people with several pitchers of beer. People knew us and kept beer and drinks coming. The people that didn't do that for us, didn't get as good of tips. Simple as. If you give us shitty service, you don't get a tip.
That just means you go bar hopping in that neighbourhood.
 
Who exactly is the market for this? Someone willing to spend this much money on a dinner is far better off going to an actual high-end restaurant, someone that likes chicken nuggets can get them in a regular fast food place, like KFC or Popeyes, and someone who has enough money for them to not care about these prices is rich enough to hire a personal chef
Smug, city dwelling white collars.

The ones that plan their dinners based around what will sound/look better to their colleagues rather than the quality of the food. The ones who peacock and preen in designer labels at whatever cultural event has gripped their social media to hide their utter fucking absence of character. The ones that only pay attention to the label instead of the contents.

In short, the modern day equivelent of those fuckhead yuppies in American Psycho.

I am so glad I only need to interact with these cunts occasionally. Living amongst them must be agony.
 
Back
Top Bottom