Opinion Your Living Standards Have Declined Dramatically

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

by Jeffrey A. Tucker

In the old days, shopping for groceries used to be a joy. By old days, I mean two years ago. Now, it is shocking and miserable. You look at these prices and wonder if you can even afford normal foods we took for granted.

Everyone knows about the egg problem, which is being chalked up to a bird flu, just as Putin was responsible for the gas price and greedy meat processors caused beef prices to soar. Sorry but this is ridiculous. The price of eggs is up dramatically because all the costs associated with making them available to consumers are up.

At first, there was just a shortage because grocery chains resisted price increases. Once they came back to the shelves, the cost dramatically rose. You are going to pay more for the worst eggs than the best egg cost only one year ago. Unless you know someone with chickens or have them yourself, you are stuck with thin shells and light-yellow yokes forever, while paying through the nose for them.

The bottom line is undeniable: in a mere two years, many of the things you loved, healthy food for your families—I’m not talking about the all-carb diet they want us to adopt—has now doubled in price. Some is up 50 percent and some is up 150 percent. This damage is absolutely not captured in the CPI, which has huge drawbacks by being calculated on an annual basis and for being a weighted index number that fails to capture the reality on the ground.

The reality you see on the shelves of your local store. The grocery prices tell the truth that you are being pillaged.

The pillaging is not limited to this problem however. And by the way, this is NOT going to improve. It would take a dramatic deflation to restore our living standards. The Fed will never permit that. At best, their intention is to take down the inflation rate to 2 percent per annum. It now stands at about 6 percent, maybe. So even if it happens to fall to zero, all prevailing prices will stick. That means that you have been robbed.

The fundamentals of household finance are even worse. Credit card balances are way up. Savings is way down. And real income (which is adjusted for inflation) has been falling now for 21 months straight. Truly, it’s panic time but people are so beaten down and exhausted that they are not panicking. Most people have acquiesced in exhaustion of the shock and awe to which they have been subjected.

These charts portend terrible things for our future. It truly means the end of prosperity. In fact, middle-class people barely remember what that was like even though we experienced it as recently as 2019. We didn’t have to choose between eating good food and heating our homes, paying our cell phone bill and going on vacation, drinking good wine and joining a gym. We could do all of those things.

No more. Our living standards have been taken down a peg or several. Of course it doesn’t affect the very wealthy that gathered this week in Davos for the World Economic Forum. They have all the resources they need and can continue to live as always. It’s the rest of us who are being ground down into the dirt.

Note too the smaller packages of everything, with producers shaving off ounces every few weeks. Try to buy the big packages like three years ago and you are likely out of luck. My favorite Turkish coffee is the same price but half the size. Did humanity suddenly desire smaller quantities of things? No, this is just a way to disguise price increases without letting the consumer know.
The other day I bought movie tickets but the bottom-line price was higher than the units. That’s because the software added a $5 “convenience fee.” So great to know that now I have to pay an extra fee for delivery of an electronic good.

Remember when Uber and Lyft were cheap and even a good alternative to owning a car? Those days are long over. Now it costs $40 just to get across town in D.C. And New York City, forget it. The prices are astronomical while the subways are more dangerous than ever. Might as well not go.

This is what is happening to us.

Now, to the critical question. How was all this accomplished, this massive increase in taxation by surreptitious means? Please understand: this was accomplished not by Putin or greedy corporations but by the Federal Reserve. They have the legal power to counterfeit. They do it by buying government debt with money that had not previously existed. This new money makes it way through the economy, watering down the value of existing money.

It’s like this. Let’s say you are holding a kids’ birthday party and have only one can of frozen lemonade. But it turns out that 50 kids show up. You do what is possible to stretch the lemonade but each serving gets weaker. At some point it is just water. The kids start to notice. You have to explain that you bumped into the physical limits. The lemonade has become ever less valuable.

It’s the same with the Fed. It does not matter that the dollar can buy more foreign currencies than ever. That has nothing to do with anything. What matters is not how much foreign currency it can buy but how many goods and services it can buy. The reason it buys far less traces to the outrageous monetary expansions of 2020 and 2021. That’s the whole reason. At one point, monetary expansion was running 26 percent per year!

They robbed you to fund their outrageous lockdown experiment and put as many businesses and people on the payroll as possible. They might as well have dropped money from helicopters. Now we are paying the price for this monetary malfeasance.

And now? For the first time ever, M2 is actually falling. How do you think that is going to work out? The mismanagement of our nation’s money stock is breathtaking.

And did you see the idea of a $1 trillion coin floating around again? This has to be the biggest monetary hoax in history. You can’t just mint a round coin, out of any material, even platinum, and cause new wealth to come into existence. The idea keeps popping up but nothing comes of it simply because the alchemy is too obvious even for the power elite to pull off.

Our rulers in D.C. have got themselves into a real fix. The people are furious about what is happening and everyone wants to know why. There is a growing populist movement out there that simply will not go along. We aren’t giving up our gas stoves. We aren’t going to eat bugs. And we aren’t going to give up our birthright to freedom just because a bunch of partying clowns in Davos tell us we have to.

We really do face a choice right now. If we do not act and do not choose wisely, we face a future of growing impoverishment, ill-health, and deprecated living standards. We are not doing this to ourselves. They are doing it to us, and they will continue on this path so long as they can get away with it.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
 
Ever since inflation apocalypse hit I've had to eat in the cafeteria every day (on employee discount) which means I have to eat soyburgers (because the real burgers are garbage in the cafeteria) which means I've become a total soyboy.

I've even developed jungle fever and stopped hating Basketball Americans because of toxic levels of tofu and beyond burger in my veins
No, you're falling right into their trap!!
 
What really gets me is on 'conservative' sites when these geezers bitch about ANY cut in social security. 'I paid into it!' and want it all back plus what they'd get in interest. They literally do not care wtf debt and misery they cause. Not to mention so many of them blow it on bullshit and leave little or nothing behind.

Social security is the BIG elephant in the room. Nobody wants to touch it, political suicide on all sides. I'd at least throw out some ideas, like only having it for the disabled or something. But nobody can even discuss it.
Some thoughts from someone who actually collects Social Security.

First, for many people Social Security isn't that much. Mine is a tad above average but not even half of the military pension. Yes, I paid into it, but my payments went to fund those collecting at the time. Not only that, but 85% of my Social Security payment is subject to Federal tax. My Medicare premium also comes out of the Social Security check. Use the money to pay bills, buy food, etc. Don't drink or smoke, no money spent there.

Second, for various reasons Social Security is all some people get in retirement. There aren't many places where a single person can live comfortably on the average Social Security check, Here, you see a lot of people renting rooms in others' houses, maybe going in on an apartment with 2-3 others, but they're living pretty lean. Or they live in their vehicles or in tents, etc. Our area is a very high-cost area. Matter of fact, check out the included link to see average payments. Note: SSI is a Federal welfare payment, administered by Social Security but funded through general government revenues. And imagine trying to live alone on an SSI check.


Okay, no Social Security? Then what happens? Going to let people starve? Not everyone can work forever. There would need to be some sort of SSI for many elderly/disabled/widows with children. Still going to cost a lot. Needs to be fixed but fixes possible.
 
Okay, no Social Security? Then what happens? Going to let people starve? Not everyone can work forever. There would need to be some sort of SSI for many elderly/disabled/widows with children. Still going to cost a lot. Needs to be fixed but fixes possible.
It's tough. It both costs too much and doesn't help all that much at the same time for most. It's a bad system. I don't have the answers, I know it helps reduce elderly poverty somewhat but the cost is awfully huge. The main problem to me is that neither party will even want to touch it for fear of the geezer voting bloc.
 
Some thoughts from someone who actually collects Social Security.

First, for many people Social Security isn't that much. Mine is a tad above average but not even half of the military pension. Yes, I paid into it, but my payments went to fund those collecting at the time. Not only that, but 85% of my Social Security payment is subject to Federal tax. My Medicare premium also comes out of the Social Security check. Use the money to pay bills, buy food, etc. Don't drink or smoke, no money spent there.

Second, for various reasons Social Security is all some people get in retirement. There aren't many places where a single person can live comfortably on the average Social Security check, Here, you see a lot of people renting rooms in others' houses, maybe going in on an apartment with 2-3 others, but they're living pretty lean. Or they live in their vehicles or in tents, etc. Our area is a very high-cost area. Matter of fact, check out the included link to see average payments. Note: SSI is a Federal welfare payment, administered by Social Security but funded through general government revenues. And imagine trying to live alone on an SSI check.


Okay, no Social Security? Then what happens? Going to let people starve? Not everyone can work forever. There would need to be some sort of SSI for many elderly/disabled/widows with children. Still going to cost a lot. Needs to be fixed but fixes possible.
Now let's talk about the elephant in the room that is Social Security being reliant upon an ever-increasing population base to support the top of the pyramid. Except there is no pyramid and it is as unsustainable as any ponzi scheme.
Having ludicrous mandatory spending is a major part of the problem.
1674936133086.png

Of the discretionary spending, about half of it is straight into "defense" and defense spending for the past three decades is a soft mandatory spending, really. So in this image ~5.5/6.8 trillion is something the government must spend. That's ~80% of the federal budget being locked behind so much red tape it is considered untouchable.
Of that, social security is over 1 trillion dollars or ~16% of the overall budget.

Something's going to give and boomers will likely not live long enough to reap what they've sown. Social security is just one example of an unsustainable federal program boomers, a large voting bloc (for now), do not permit to even be reviewed. You'll get yours, but will your kids? Your grandkids?
 
It's tough. It both costs too much and doesn't help all that much at the same time for most. It's a bad system. I don't have the answers, I know it helps reduce elderly poverty somewhat but the cost is awfully huge. The main problem to me is that neither party will even want to touch it for fear of the geezer voting bloc.
No, it needs to be touched, just touched smartly. One thing that would help is lifting the cap on the amount of wages subject to the Social Security tax. Something will need to be done in the next few years to keep benefits at the present level.

When SS first came into being, life expectancy was overall much lower than today. They never planned or expected to pay the retirement benefits for 20-30 years plus. Life expectancy's gone up a lot over the years, but for political reasons the benefits are maintained. Been some changes but again, more changes - smart changes - are needed.
 
No, it needs to be touched, just touched smartly. One thing that would help is lifting the cap on the amount of wages subject to the Social Security tax. Something will need to be done in the next few years to keep benefits at the present level.

When SS first came into being, life expectancy was overall much lower than today. They never planned or expected to pay the retirement benefits for 20-30 years plus. Life expectancy's gone up a lot over the years, but for political reasons the benefits are maintained. Been some changes but again, more changes - smart changes - are needed.
Agree fully, and would like to add the millions of permanently disabled vets who can't work due to their disabilities some still in their teens until they die (though one could say we don't often live to old age) I know I didn't plan on becoming permanently disabled before I was 40.
 
No, it needs to be touched, just touched smartly. One thing that would help is lifting the cap on the amount of wages subject to the Social Security tax. Something will need to be done in the next few years to keep benefits at the present level.

When SS first came into being, life expectancy was overall much lower than today. They never planned or expected to pay the retirement benefits for 20-30 years plus. Life expectancy's gone up a lot over the years, but for political reasons the benefits are maintained. Been some changes but again, more changes - smart changes - are needed.
Pretty sure Joseph has me ignored at this point but replying to maintain the thread of discussion.

What needs to be done is that Social Security should be completely reevaluated. What is its purpose?
Its initial purpose was to force the layman to contribute to their own retirement and wellbeing of the elderly after seeing most people are terrible at savings, albeit indirectly. Implementing it required an initial investment of taxes from the younger generation of the time to prop up the seniors of the time which got the snowball rolling down the hill. The notion is simultaneously that "you pay into your own social security" and "you are footing the bill for your current seniors." From the start it relied on a classic population pyramid.

Ever since then it's expanded, costing more and more. Currently, boomers get out of it far more than they put into it with things added in when they were younger that they didn't pay into. This is to be expected as boomers have been the most influential voting demographic their entire lives, the system is built around them because that's who politicians appeal to for the easiest victories. If you want to lose an election, say you want to reform anything to do with Social Security programs.
Sustainability was an afterthought and it's well understood that the coffers will be drained within the next two decades unless there are significant changes. This in addition to many pension systems being projected to run dry for similar reasons.

It's not all bad but the fact that it's simultaneously untouchable and unsustainable makes it one of the most rotten things on the books right now as the consequences come to the fore.
 
Life hack: look in your neighborhoods for signs that say "In this house we believe" in faggy rainbow print. These are free loot drops if you have a gun. Plus you're not hurting actual people.
 
Agree fully, and would like to add the millions of permanently disabled vets who can't work due to their disabilities some still in their teens until they die (though one could say we don't often live to old age) I know I didn't plan on becoming permanently disabled before I was 40.
In theory, the disabled vets are eligible for some measure of VA disability compensation. Get 10% myself. But agree with you these vets should also receive some measure of Social Security Disability payments. Say, collecting from the VA as 100% disabled, get the full Social Security Disability, 90% disabled - 90% of the SS disability, and so on. Matter of fact, they'd collect that SS disability on top of any Social Security retirement benefits due them at retirement age. Why not? Disabled vets have paid for their benefits in a coin far dearer than mere money. I was lucky, just lost part of the hearing. Many, many disabled vets are much worse off.

And concurrent receipt of military retirement benefits, plus the disability compensations, whether combat-related or not. As it is, the amount of my VA disability compensation is deducted from the military pension, then paid to me tax-free. Real gain only a few bucks a month. Sustained hearing loss doing my wartime job while an enlisted man in Korea, but since non-combat-related no concurrent receipt.
 
I don't care about inflation, but what the absolute fuck is with these massive price increases? I have started hounding clearance aisles and buying in bulk whenever I can. There are many "luxury" items I no longer use because they're beyond my budget (like buying store brand instead of name-brand Lysol, or no longer buying oil-based face wash).
Late and gay, but the rate of inflation isn't actually going down: the rate of inflation increase is what's declining - i.e. your quintessential double derivative calculus problem.

It's the media, business groups, and government being disingenuous for the sake of confusion, misdirection, and their own self-interest. Inflation hasn't gone anywhere, the media chatter on it has simply been offloaded onto rate increases versus the actual rate of increase.
 
I mean I would've assumed that when literally everything was trying to scam me.


I mean seriously. A monthly membership for free haircuts??
with a cancellation fee a minimum membership fee a mandatory minimum visitation fee taxes tips and a summary kick to the nads
 
Are you allowed to keep chickens where you live? At this point it'd be worth considering if you can.

Yes, let's bootlick for CBDCs instead.
Please show me where I said anything about central banks or digital currencies. Especially digital currencies. What is it with you Boomers and capitalism? Why do you all have fucking panic attacks when people talk about how it has failed and how we need something other than capitalism. If it isn't something else other than capitalism all you will get stuck with is socialism or communism. But it seems like we are heading towards some kind of European style socialism. Which is like a mix of capitalism and socialism. People aren't going to continue to suffer under capitalism and do nothing about it.
 
Please show me where I said anything about central banks or digital currencies.
Name an economic model that is neither capitalism, socialism or communism. There's little alternative to what you want, except for what the WEF is angling for, which is a global CBDC.
What is it with you Boomers and capitalism? Why do you all have fucking panic attacks when people talk about how it has failed and how we need something other than capitalism.
Because I have a basic grasp in how economics works, what's your alternative to prices on a store shelf? Central planning?
If it isn't something else other than capitalism all you will get stuck with is socialism or communism. But it seems like we are heading towards some kind of European style socialism. Which is like a mix of capitalism and socialism. People aren't going to continue to suffer under capitalism and do nothing about it.
The United States isn't even real capitalism, it's a mixed economy where the corporations most associated with the government succeed the most, so your pontifications that capitalism is outdated doesn't even fit the reality.
 
Because I have a basic grasp in how economics works, what's your alternative to prices on a store shelf? Central planning?
What are your credentials exactly, you drive trucks for a living and that's what lead you to believe anarcho-capitalism is the ideal economic system?
The United States isn't even real capitalism, it's a mixed economy where the corporations most associated with the government succeed the most, so your pontifications that capitalism is outdated doesn't even fit the reality.
You know, if your system has never been really tried, maybe there's a reason for that, that reason possilby being that it's not possible to implement it for a significant period of time before it becomes corrupted because human nature.
 
Train ticket from France to the Netherlands a few years ago: 45 euros/pp.
Train ticket from France to the Netherlands next weekend: 250 euros/pp.

Blablacar it is.
There's also the egg thing, the cream cheese thing, the thing involving bananas.

Just because the MSM stopped bitching doesn't mean the supply shortages stopped.
Which is why this Ukraine shit is so fucking stupid.
 
Back
Top Bottom