Opinion Your Living Standards Have Declined Dramatically

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

by Jeffrey A. Tucker

In the old days, shopping for groceries used to be a joy. By old days, I mean two years ago. Now, it is shocking and miserable. You look at these prices and wonder if you can even afford normal foods we took for granted.

Everyone knows about the egg problem, which is being chalked up to a bird flu, just as Putin was responsible for the gas price and greedy meat processors caused beef prices to soar. Sorry but this is ridiculous. The price of eggs is up dramatically because all the costs associated with making them available to consumers are up.

At first, there was just a shortage because grocery chains resisted price increases. Once they came back to the shelves, the cost dramatically rose. You are going to pay more for the worst eggs than the best egg cost only one year ago. Unless you know someone with chickens or have them yourself, you are stuck with thin shells and light-yellow yokes forever, while paying through the nose for them.

The bottom line is undeniable: in a mere two years, many of the things you loved, healthy food for your families—I’m not talking about the all-carb diet they want us to adopt—has now doubled in price. Some is up 50 percent and some is up 150 percent. This damage is absolutely not captured in the CPI, which has huge drawbacks by being calculated on an annual basis and for being a weighted index number that fails to capture the reality on the ground.

The reality you see on the shelves of your local store. The grocery prices tell the truth that you are being pillaged.

The pillaging is not limited to this problem however. And by the way, this is NOT going to improve. It would take a dramatic deflation to restore our living standards. The Fed will never permit that. At best, their intention is to take down the inflation rate to 2 percent per annum. It now stands at about 6 percent, maybe. So even if it happens to fall to zero, all prevailing prices will stick. That means that you have been robbed.

The fundamentals of household finance are even worse. Credit card balances are way up. Savings is way down. And real income (which is adjusted for inflation) has been falling now for 21 months straight. Truly, it’s panic time but people are so beaten down and exhausted that they are not panicking. Most people have acquiesced in exhaustion of the shock and awe to which they have been subjected.

These charts portend terrible things for our future. It truly means the end of prosperity. In fact, middle-class people barely remember what that was like even though we experienced it as recently as 2019. We didn’t have to choose between eating good food and heating our homes, paying our cell phone bill and going on vacation, drinking good wine and joining a gym. We could do all of those things.

No more. Our living standards have been taken down a peg or several. Of course it doesn’t affect the very wealthy that gathered this week in Davos for the World Economic Forum. They have all the resources they need and can continue to live as always. It’s the rest of us who are being ground down into the dirt.

Note too the smaller packages of everything, with producers shaving off ounces every few weeks. Try to buy the big packages like three years ago and you are likely out of luck. My favorite Turkish coffee is the same price but half the size. Did humanity suddenly desire smaller quantities of things? No, this is just a way to disguise price increases without letting the consumer know.
The other day I bought movie tickets but the bottom-line price was higher than the units. That’s because the software added a $5 “convenience fee.” So great to know that now I have to pay an extra fee for delivery of an electronic good.

Remember when Uber and Lyft were cheap and even a good alternative to owning a car? Those days are long over. Now it costs $40 just to get across town in D.C. And New York City, forget it. The prices are astronomical while the subways are more dangerous than ever. Might as well not go.

This is what is happening to us.

Now, to the critical question. How was all this accomplished, this massive increase in taxation by surreptitious means? Please understand: this was accomplished not by Putin or greedy corporations but by the Federal Reserve. They have the legal power to counterfeit. They do it by buying government debt with money that had not previously existed. This new money makes it way through the economy, watering down the value of existing money.

It’s like this. Let’s say you are holding a kids’ birthday party and have only one can of frozen lemonade. But it turns out that 50 kids show up. You do what is possible to stretch the lemonade but each serving gets weaker. At some point it is just water. The kids start to notice. You have to explain that you bumped into the physical limits. The lemonade has become ever less valuable.

It’s the same with the Fed. It does not matter that the dollar can buy more foreign currencies than ever. That has nothing to do with anything. What matters is not how much foreign currency it can buy but how many goods and services it can buy. The reason it buys far less traces to the outrageous monetary expansions of 2020 and 2021. That’s the whole reason. At one point, monetary expansion was running 26 percent per year!

They robbed you to fund their outrageous lockdown experiment and put as many businesses and people on the payroll as possible. They might as well have dropped money from helicopters. Now we are paying the price for this monetary malfeasance.

And now? For the first time ever, M2 is actually falling. How do you think that is going to work out? The mismanagement of our nation’s money stock is breathtaking.

And did you see the idea of a $1 trillion coin floating around again? This has to be the biggest monetary hoax in history. You can’t just mint a round coin, out of any material, even platinum, and cause new wealth to come into existence. The idea keeps popping up but nothing comes of it simply because the alchemy is too obvious even for the power elite to pull off.

Our rulers in D.C. have got themselves into a real fix. The people are furious about what is happening and everyone wants to know why. There is a growing populist movement out there that simply will not go along. We aren’t giving up our gas stoves. We aren’t going to eat bugs. And we aren’t going to give up our birthright to freedom just because a bunch of partying clowns in Davos tell us we have to.

We really do face a choice right now. If we do not act and do not choose wisely, we face a future of growing impoverishment, ill-health, and deprecated living standards. We are not doing this to ourselves. They are doing it to us, and they will continue on this path so long as they can get away with it.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
 
What are your credentials exactly, you drive trucks for a living and that's what lead you to believe anarcho-capitalism is the ideal economic system?
I don't believe anybody mentioned anarcho-capitalism in particular. Nor do I recall calling into question anyone's "credentials." What exactly credits you to talk about economics as opposed to anyone else? Name a system that's better than letting those with talent select their own vocation & succeed by merit. Name a better system in which prices dictate the flow of goods and services by demand.

I was lead to the conclusion that capitalism is the most optimal economic model by its historical track record, as opposed to other economic models that are based around central planning. Your alternatives are ones predicated on a serf & lord system, be it in the form of classical monarchies or a façade of equality by cutting the tall grass & forcing everyone to be equally useless when they don't have to.
You know, if your system has never been really tried, maybe there's a reason for that, that reason possilby being that it's not possible to implement it for a significant period of time before it becomes corrupted because human nature.
While that is true of all economic models, capitalism & the derivatives thereof have certainly lasted longer than communism or socialism, see the USSR & Venezuela for details.

Of the three, capitalism has the fewest weaknesses, and that's why it continues in spite of its hang-ups. You cannot beat the efficiency and versatility of a system that rewards talent and drives down prices via competition.
 
Last edited:
I don't believe anybody mentioned anarcho-capitalism in particular. Nor do I recall calling into question anyone's "credentials." What exactly credits you to talk about economics as opposed to anyone else? Name a system that's better than letting those with talent select their own vocation & succeed by merit. Name a better system in which prices dictate the flow of goods and services by demand.

I was lead to the conclusion that capitalism is the most optimal economic model by its historical track record, as opposed to other economic models that are based around central planning. Your alternatives are ones predicated on a serf & lord system, be it in the form of classical monarchies or a façade of equality by cutting the tall grass & forcing everyone to be equally useless when they don't have to.
Then what is this "real capitalism has never been tried"? There has never been a time in the past century where the government wasn't heavily meddling in the economy, and humanity's most prosperous period in history occurred during this time, but according to you that wasn't real capitalism, so history suggests that having the government actively guide the economy is the best system.

While that is true of all economic models, capitalism & the derivatives thereof have certainly lasted longer than communism or socialism, see the USSR & Venezuela for details.

Of the three, capitalism has the fewest weaknesses, and that's why it continues in spite of its hang-ups. You cannot beat the efficiency and versatility of a system that rewards talent and drives down prices via competition.
No, we don't have real capitalism as you mentioned before, real capitalism has never been tried, therefore capitalism lasted just as long as communism, which has also never been tried.
 
Then what is this "real capitalism has never been tried"?
I never said that real capitalism hasn't been tried, I said the U.S. isn't genuinely capitalist. The Covid lockdowns are just one testament to this.
There has never been a time in the past century where the government wasn't heavily meddling in the economy, and humanity's most prosperous period in history occurred during this time,
The government also prolonged the Great Depression because it meddled in the economy.
but according to you that wasn't real capitalism, so history suggests that having the government actively guide the economy is the best system.
Nice try at bottlenecking this argument into the conclusion you want, but I can always point to post-WW2 economics to demolish this argument since the U.S. was the world's manufacturing powerhouse during that period, right up until globalism kicked in and jobs started being transplanted to foreign nations like China.

And if government guided economies are always the best, why was China so poor until they observed the economic prosperity of Hong Kong while it was under the UK's rule, then relented on their anti-capitalist stranglehold and allowed "economic zones" to exist? It was only by letting their foot off the economic brake peddle that they ascended to the prosperity they have now, one which they are again smothering to death with Xi Jingping's Maoist nostalgia.
No, we don't have real capitalism as you mentioned before, real capitalism has never been tried, therefore capitalism lasted just as long as communism, which has also never been tried.
I never made the assertion that capitalism had never been tried nor did I postulate that communism hadn't been tried.

It's very telling that when asked what alternative is superior to capitalism, you avoid answering.
 
The people will eventually pay for the underfunded welfare system we have with a VAT. Only way to extract money from the 'rich' who save in Roth accounts and the boomers who voted themselves bloated, permanent pensions. Social security maximum taxable cap will obviously move to unlimited to keep feeding the beast. Likely will means test social security as well.

Also, christ, if you really believe vets need even more cash, just look at these charts: https://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/Quickfacts/SCD_trends_FINAL_2018.pdf. The right people need more cash, but we don't need to pay every asshole that jacked off in a FOB for four years after their traumatic hearing injury due to listening to metallica at 120dB.

I feel for the guys who are actually injured and get fucked by the scammers, but it's currently another shadow welfare system where a lot of the folks leaving the military just have no useful skills and can't succeed in our modern blender of a system.
 
Last edited:
I never said that real capitalism hasn't been tried, I said the U.S. isn't genuinely capitalist. The Covid lockdowns are just one testament to this.
The US is capitalist whenever you need to praise it, and not real capitalism whenever you need something to blame, whatever you say.
Nice try at bottlenecking this argument into the conclusion you want, but I can always point to post-WW2 economics to demolish this argument since the U.S. was the world's manufacturing powerhouse during that period, right up until globalism kicked in and jobs started being transplanted to foreign nations like China.

And if government guided economies are always the best, why was China so poor until they observed the economic prosperity of Hong Kong while it was under the UK's rule, then relented on their anti-capitalist stranglehold and allowed "economic zones" to exist? It was only by letting their foot off the economic brake peddle that they ascended to the prosperity they have now, one which they are again smothering to death with Xi Jingping's Maoist nostalgia.
Maybe you should stop looking for a magic system that will solve all your problems, that's how autistic people look at the world. There is no system that can protect itself from corruption, and your founding fathers' attempts at their checks and balances system is evidently a failure. The only thing I've ever seen that can slow it down is culture, so maybe you shouldn't spend decades of encouraging a nihilistic dog-eat-dog 'profit at any cost' culture and then complain that you're being outmaneuvered by smarter sociopaths.
It's very telling that when asked what alternative is superior to capitalism, you avoid answering.
There is little point in debating which system is the best under the current culture, every system will catastrophically. Any good ideas get corrupted, bad ideas will be followed through. The main difference is that some ideas, such as your ancap fantasies, will fail much faster than others.
 
The US is capitalist whenever you need to praise it, and not real capitalism whenever you need something to blame, whatever you say.
Incorrect, the US used to be more capitalist than it is, now it's more akin to a corporatist state. I can't point to the exact point it became less than capitalist, but obviously things like minimum wage are a contributing factor toward globalism as it placed a price control on American labor (specifically for the purposes of keeping black people out of the workplace), thereby creating the incentive to offload jobs to foreign nations. The older the nation becomes, the more regulatory it gets and the less capitalist it becomes, which creates artificial monopolies like Big Pharma. It's not mutually contradictive to praise capitalism when it's allowed to work & point out that making it illegal for anyone beside Big Pharma to sell cheap, easily manufactured medications like insulin is a top-down erosion of capitalism that could only be made possible by government meddling.
Maybe you should stop looking for a magic system that will solve all your problems, that's how autistic people look at the world. There is no system that can protect itself from corruption, and your founding fathers' attempts at their checks and balances system is evidently a failure.
The point of the checks & balances placed by the Founding Fathers was to prevent any one person from wielding unilateral power as an autocrat and to give each state representation. Maybe you should actually look into American civics before writing it off as a failure when you can't even offer up a superior alternative.
The only thing I've ever seen that can slow it down is culture, so maybe you shouldn't spend decades of encouraging a nihilistic dog-eat-dog 'profit at any cost' culture and then complain that you're being outmaneuvered by smarter sociopaths.
As opposed to A) your nonexistent system to replace the existing paradigm or B) a system in which one sociopath micromanages the lives of everyday people & makes regular purges of anyone who dissents against the government.
 
Incorrect, the US used to be more capitalist than it is, now it's more akin to a corporatist state. I can't point to the exact point it became less than capitalist, but obviously things like minimum wage are a contributing factor toward globalism as it placed a price control on American labor (specifically for the purposes of keeping black people out of the workplace), thereby creating the incentive to offload jobs to foreign nations. The older the nation becomes, the more regulatory it gets and the less capitalist it becomes, which creates artificial monopolies like Big Pharma. It's not mutually contradictive to praise capitalism when it's allowed to work & point out that making it illegal for anyone beside Big Pharma to sell cheap, easily manufactured medications like insulin is a top-down erosion of capitalism that could only be made possible by government meddling.
And we're back to being an ancap. Regulations exist for a reason, they existed during the post-WW2 era, and the lack of regulations is not going to prevent globalism. If you want to protect local industries, you need government intervention.
As opposed to A) your nonexistent system to replace the existing paradigm or B) a system in which one sociopath micromanages the lives of everyday people & makes regular purges of anyone who dissents against the government.
Consider that maybe modern society is turning to shit because the people in modern society are mostly shit, and removing all regulations or descending into anarchy isn't going to fix all your problems.
 
Last edited:
Life hack: look in your neighborhoods for signs that say "In this house we believe" in faggy rainbow print. These are free loot drops if you have a gun. Plus you're not hurting actual people.
not a place of honour.jpg
Just be careful not to steal anything glowing.
 
And we're back to being an ancap.
No we're not, I've not once advocated for statelessness nor lawlessness.

Do you know what anarcho-capitalism is?
Regulations exist for a reason, they existed during the post-WW2 era, and the lack of regulations is not going to prevent globalism. If you want to protect local industries, you need government intervention.
Whatever happened to the U.S. being corrupt and the Founding Fathers' checks and balances being a failure? Regulations seem to work when you need them to, but the decentralized government implementing them doesn't work when it's inconvenient.

Not to mention this implies that all regulations are of the same quality and they're all to the benefit of the general populace. Minimum wage is a government regulation, and it first existed for the purpose of excluding black people from the workforce, and now it excludes all Americans from the global workforce. There was also state mandated eugenics in 32 of U.S. states until the 1970s, much of it predicated on perceived stupidity, did these eugenics laws also exist "for a reason?"

You seem to have an utter aversion to acknowledging, challenging or refuting any and all historical examples when it's introduced to the conversation. It's almost like none of your rhetoric could stand up to scrutiny if you were to ever acknowledge the history of economics. Otherwise, why can't you answer simple questions like "if capitalism is so bad, why did communist China start using it?"

You've also yet to offer up a proper alternative to the big three economic models of capitalism, socialism & communism. I'm still waiting for this purported fourth system of economics Zoomers can never seem to describe when dismissing capitalism as a failure, and when asked for this purported alternative, you simply dismiss the question as "stop trying to conjure up a magic system that will solve all your problems," as if that's not exactly what you're doing.

It's also quite ironic how capitalism is a failure that no longer exists due to regulation, yet it's simultaneously a blight on mankind which needs to be done away with. Which is it?
Consider that maybe modern society is turning to shit because the people in modern society are mostly shit, and removing all regulations or descending into anarchy isn't going to fix all your problems.
No one has mentioned anarchy besides you.
 
I follow Haz Infrared and I think the communist/stalinist perspective is interesting. We need to re-establish working class jobs for our lower class and give training to make them competitive in the modern economy, like teaching them how to code. We also need to give our finance and industry back to the people and close our borders for protectionism. This is why China is successful 💪🇨🇳🇺🇲
 
No we're not, I've not once advocated for statelessness nor lawlessness.

Do you know what anarcho-capitalism is?
I have never seen anyone who's obsessed with defending the virtues of capitalism that wasn't effectively an ancap. If there was less of a negative stigma around it, you'd probably identify as one. Much like how no one self-identifies as an authoritarian but plenty of people identify as a libertarian, yet authoritarians are apparently everywhere.
It's also quite ironic how capitalism is a failure that no longer exists due to regulation, yet it's simultaneously a blight on mankind which needs to be done away with. Which is it?

No one has mentioned anarchy besides you.
For someone who complains about others putting words in his mouth, you sure like to do that a lot yourself. Maybe it's because the only real capitalism to you is anarcho-capitalism, so whenever someone criticizes ancaps, you take that to mean they're criticizing capitalism itself.
 
I have never seen anyone who's obsessed with defending the virtues of capitalism that wasn't effectively an ancap.
To advocate for meritocracy & a decentralized economy is now somehow advocating for lawlessness & statelessness, as if there or no other ideologies which advocate for capitalism like Libertarianism or Republicanism, nor could it be an economic model which stands on its own.

Did it ever occur to you that capitalism needs the rule of law to function, where an Anarchist society would be plagued by gangs & violence?
If there was less of a negative stigma around it, you'd probably identify as one.
One of the key tenets of Anarchy is statelessness and having no laws, so no.
Much like how no one self-identifies as an authoritarian but plenty of people identify as a libertarian, yet authoritarians are apparently everywhere.
No, Libertarianism is often considered a joke and has much stigma attached to it, simply because it's neither Democrat nor Republican, even despite being the founding ideology of the United States. Though I agree, authoritarians are often too afraid of simply coming out and saying what they are.
For someone who complains about others putting words in his mouth
Funny, I don't recall making this particular complaint, it's almost like there's an ulterior motive to this argument you're not willing to just say, and instead you're beating around the bush to make a point by making fallacious arguments.
 
To advocate for meritocracy & a decentralized economy is now somehow advocating for lawlessness & statelessness, as if there or no other ideologies which advocate for capitalism like Libertarianism or Republicanism, nor could it be an economic model which stands on its own.

Did it ever occur to you that capitalism needs the rule of law to function, where an Anarchist society would be plagued by gangs & violence?

One of the key tenets of Anarchy is statelessness and having no laws, so no.
Yes, this is why we call it anarcho-capitalism, not anarchy. Standard anarchists would argue ancaps aren't true anarchists.
No, Libertarianism is often considered a joke and has much stigma attached to it, simply because it's neither Democrat nor Republican, even despite being the founding ideology of the United States. Though I agree, authoritarians are often too afraid of simply coming out and saying what they are.
In real life that is true, but libertarianism was fairly dominant on the internet until people finally got fed up with their retarded ideas and mocked them into oblivion.
 
Back
Top Bottom