why does homosexuality exist?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

DoNotFeedTheSneed

A FANCY GERMAN CAR DOES NOT FUCKIN STOP IT
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 29, 2023
I'm not saying this to own the gays or anything like that, I'm genuinely curious. Why did it evolve as a trait in humans and some other mammals? what causes it to trigger? is it genetic?
 
Solution
Because you actually want to know the real answer, I have bad news, we don't know why. People will of course say that it's some kind of philia or it's because they were molested as children or low testosterone or whatever but the matter of the fact is most of those are DEFINITELY false and the others don't work. First off homosexuality has been seen in basically every species of animals that are studied about this are observed to have had homosexual sex, and in some cases, even have same sex special bonding. Second the idea that they are molested is possibly closer to it but not really. Among heterosexual males about 10% claim to have been molested, where as homosexual males have claimed twice that at 20% of them, which still doesn't...
A variety of reasons but I will always subscribe to the idea it's a mixture of first exposure and mental illness regardless of how much people want to cope about how it's somewhat natural(maybe in some rare instances sure but overall no) there is no coincidence why every single homo I have ever met or seen has always been a beyond mentally ill porn addict degen hedonist
 
The "there are ghey animals" thing is just bullshit if you ask me. I don't think any animals are gay, they are just retarded animals and sometimes confuse a male for a female because they are dumb and sometimes they don't have very distinguishing features. Not because they are gay.
Are there retarded humans who confuse males with females, and vice-versa?
 
Fwiw I will probably get shit for this, but I don't care.

The current theory is that it evolved as a mechanism so that there would be more caretakers in a childs life. I.e gay uncle or whatever helping to take care of his sister's kids.
I agree with this. The more sons you have, the higher chance that any subsequent boy is gay. There’s probably a chemical / hormonal reason for it, but because it happens after a bunch of kids, there’s no selection pressure for it to be removed.
 
Homosexual behaviour in women is the same reason why men are attracted to breasts: baby yearns for sustenance and mother's breasts contain sustenance; therefor, baby wants mommy's breasts. Combine this with women wanting to be as pretty as another woman probably results in being attracted to them; the same could be said toward males as well.
Homosexual behaviour in men is caused by a multitude of problems: mental mutation, being molested as a child, severe porn addiction, etc.
 
I personally believe that environmental factors are also significant influences of homosexuality.

Down the line, it's an exclusive fetish of sort.

  • Boys who get diddled by other men often grow up to be homosexuals.
  • Same with people who had their first exploring experiences with other boys.
  • Same with boys who grew up surrounded by women and sisters without any male figure to look up to or an abusive male figure.

I am not saying that being gay is not something that only occurs through external factors..

However, I do strongly believe that one's first sexual experiences have a strong influence further down the line when it comes to sexual preferences and fetishes.

I am not in denial of the fact that some people just appear to be born gay.

I've personally been horny and desperate to get action, and sometimes got hit on by guys. It never ever crossed my mind to engage. It might be harsh, but it kind of repulses me, I think that's the best way to describe it. I don't think that it's possible to force yourself to enjoy something you are inexplicably repulsed by.
I think the old medical idea, that it was a physical and/or psychological illness can't fully explain it.

I think the newfangled idea that it's just normal and A-OK, summed up with the unproven claim that they are "born this way" is just ignoring the issue.

for starters, the "born this way" thing is an albatross. it's a defensive argument to ward off accusations of voluntarily participating in the act. but also, I think it probably feels that way internally to any gay person. either way, it can be safely ignored.

now I realize the whole nature vs nurture thing is a huge scientific and philosophical slapfight, and I'm not going to try and make a comprehensive and rigorous argument here. so indulge me; let's just take a slightly modified version of the tabula rasa stance, and say that nobody is born any kind of way unless it has to do with genetics (i.e. height, hair color, skin color) or developmental deformity (i.e. Down syndrome, fetal alcohol syndrome). the overwhelming majority of human behaviors and modes of thought are learned, especially during developmental years. however, the nature of the human brain seems to lend itself towards certain trends (i.e. babies cry to get what they want, toddlers want to zoom around everywhere as soon as they learn to walk, kids learn language by mimicking the people they see around them) and these starting trends cause other trends down the road based on various external factors (i.e. a child that cries a lot and always gets attention is not being conditioned enough to learn to stop crying as it gets older). however, not every factor produces the same outcome. for example, not every neglected child becomes a serial killer, and not every serial killer was neglected as a child. but there is a notable trend.

now, take human sexual development for an example. it has certain behavioral markers in both boys and girls and most kids will reliably reach those markers without interference. however, like with any human behavior, this path can be curved through external factors. critically, exterior influence has a greater chance of diverting the path further the earlier it's applied. the obvious exterior factors that interfere with sexual development are:
  • early exposure to sex. this might be in the form of access to pornography, or the presence of a sexually promiscuous (and maybe exhibitionist) member of the household.
  • distorted sexual education. kids will naturally trend towards being straight, but giving them the idea early on that (for example) homosexuality is desirable can curve their path of development.
  • child sex abuse. this is what most people who aren't fully rainbowpilled point to as a chief cause. children react strongly to the behavior of adults around them, and sex abuse is a powerful combination of being exposed to adult behavior, being behaviorally conditioned by an adult, and feeling physical sensations that anchor those experiences.
note that homosexuality is one of several possible outcomes. hyperpromiscuity is the more typical outcome, which can fuel other sexual behaviors including but not limited to homosexuality or bisexuality.

less obvious factors are just child stress factors in general. anything inhibiting development can possibly manifest in sexual behaviors down the road. this includes physical (non-sexual) abuse, neglect, early exposure to death, etc.

my maternal grandfather was a savage drunk and regularly beat my mother and her siblings. the girls were subject to regular sexual abuse as his drinking buddies liked to feel them up when they were over at their house (this would have been around age 8-12). this was the eventual outcome: my aunts turned out more or less normal - straight, no anomalous sexual behaviors. my mother showed signs of hyperpromiscuity, but it was only ever towards my dad - she had very few sexual partners in her life, and no others after she met him. one uncle, who was subject to physical but not sexual abuse, came out as gay when he was still a teenager, and was enthusiastically hyperpromiscuous, but only for a couple decades until he settled down with one guy, then separated from him, then became effectively asexual. since then I only know of one other sexual encounter he's had (yeah we're pretty open about this stuff lol).

tl;dr: to give a more specific answer, it is a learned behavior, but something that is learned developmentally (not directly through social contagion) from a host of possible sources, which includes child sex abuse, but also developmental difficulties in general. in older times, cultural behaviors about sex and relationships would have worked to curtail these behaviors a lot harder than they do now, but the Sexual Revolution opened the Pandora's Box in this respect.
 
I also think some men become homosexuals trough excessive porn consumption and inceldom. Kind of like prison-gay where they hate women so much that they think they are "owning" women by jerking it to femboy porn.
thats not what prison gay means
prison gay means "prisoner is mega horny but there are no women in prison so he has to settle for boypussy instead"
there's also a big element of domination and sadism involved, but it has nothing to do with hating women or watching porn

The "there are ghey animals" thing is just bullshit if you ask me. I don't think any animals are gay, they are just retarded animals and sometimes confuse a male for a female because they are dumb and sometimes they don't have very distinguishing features. Not because they are gay.
animals aren't gay but they aren't retarded either, they can tell the sexes apart by smell. humans can do this too when they aren't masking their body odor with deodorants and perfumes.

animal homosex is the same as male rape in humans: it's about violently asserting ones dominance over the other.
to go back to the prison comparison: most prison rapists aren't really homosexuals, they're just violent sadists who enjoy violating and utterly humiliating another man. homosex in animals is the same thing.
 
Last edited:
Because you actually want to know the real answer, I have bad news, we don't know why. People will of course say that it's some kind of philia or it's because they were molested as children or low testosterone or whatever but the matter of the fact is most of those are DEFINITELY false and the others don't work. First off homosexuality has been seen in basically every species of animals that are studied about this are observed to have had homosexual sex, and in some cases, even have same sex special bonding. Second the idea that they are molested is possibly closer to it but not really. Among heterosexual males about 10% claim to have been molested, where as homosexual males have claimed twice that at 20% of them, which still doesn't explain the remaining 80% of homosexual men. Third, there has been nothing seen that shows that homosexual men have lower testosterone, but it is well known in the weight lifting and body building communities that guys with high levels of testosterone, and specifically tren, will suddenly have attraction to other men.
 
Solution
I agree with this. The more sons you have, the higher chance that any subsequent boy is gay. There’s probably a chemical / hormonal reason for it, but because it happens after a bunch of kids, there’s no selection pressure for it to be removed.
The reaction is from the immune system, allegedly. Here is an article from a few years ago on the topic https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5777082/

Alaternative link https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719534115

Select bits

"Three types of biological mechanisms have been identified in this context. First, work in a variety of animal models has shown that sexual partner preference can be experimentally modified by perinatal treatments with sex steroids: masculinization [i.e., development of gynephilia (attraction to females)] following exposure to testosterone or its estrogenic metabolites, and feminization [development of androphilia (attraction to males)] in the (relative) absence of these steroids during a critical period of development. Correlative studies suggest that these mechanisms are also at play in humans. Endocrine pathologies that modify the embryonic hormonal environment are associated with increased incidence of homosexuality. Additionally, numerous epidemiological studies have shown that gay men and lesbians display a partial sex-reversal of morphological, physiological, and behavioral/cognitive traits that are sexually differentiated, and in many cases known to develop under the early influence of sex steroids. Second, there is strong evidence, from studies of family trees and of monozygotic and dizygotic twins, of a genetic component to the control of sexual orientation, even if attempts to identify the specific genes involved have met so far with little success. Recent publications also suggest that epigenetic mechanisms could be involved but the specifics have so far remained elusive. Third, and directly relevant to Bogaert et al., homosexuality in males has been consistently and repeatedly linked to the presence of older brothers born to the same mother, the FBO effect. While FBO represents the best-documented biological influence on sexual orientation, the underlying mechanisms had remained completely speculative so far."

"After considering the possibilities over the years, Bogaert and Skorska concluded that the most plausible explanation was based on a progressive immunization of the mother bearing male embryos against a male antigen; antibodies would accumulate over successive pregnancies and increasingly interfere with the development of the embryonic brain of subsequent sons. This maternal immune hypothesis (MIH) would be similar to what happens in the hemolytic disease of the newborn where a mother with a rhesus negative (Rh−) blood type mounts an immune response against the Rh factor upon giving birth to a Rh+ offspring; the resulting antibodies attack the red blood cells and cause anemia in subsequent Rh+ offspring."
 
Because evolution is about populations, not individuals, and a chronic defect in the genetic code/hormone balance/socialization of individuals that soft-sterilizes ~4% of the population is absolutely fine in the larger view. Just like certain cars have chronically defective starter solenoids, some humans have chronically defective sex drives- problem is we don't know how to replace the latter.
 
An honest answer not steeped in postmodernist feelings-based theory goes like this:

Genetic mistakes and structural abnormalities happen, that accounts for all of the things that are outright negative from an evolutionary standpoint, and it accounts for evolution itself. Because abnormalities happen you'll wind up with obviously biologically counterproductive problems like homosexuality, mental retardation, physical deformities, congenital disease even in a healthy population. There's also no honest denying that environment and treatment is a contributing factor. You can be born predisposed to heart disease and get it no matter how well you take care of yourself, you can be born predisposed and not get it because you cared for yourself well, or you can be born with no predisposition and get it because you abuse your body.
 
thats not what prison gay means
prison gay means "prisoner is mega horny but there are no women in prison so he has to settle for boypussy instead"
there's also a big element of domination and sadism involved, but it has nothing to do with hating women or watching porn


animals aren't gay but they aren't retarded either, they can tell the sexes apart by smell. humans can do this too when they aren't masking their body odor with deodorants and perfumes.

animal homosex is the same as male rape in humans: it's about violently asserting ones dominance over the other.
to go back to the prison comparison: most prison rapists aren't really homosexuals, they're just violent sadists who enjoy violating and utterly humiliating another man. homosex in animals is the same thing.
You cut off the part where I explained how it's prison gay. It's because incels can't get women to fuck them so they start hating women so much they can't even jerk off to them, they then start watching femboy porn cause it's the only thing available that doesn't make them want to commit suicide immediately and become gay.

Also I don't believe into the whole "rape is just a dominance thing". If your pp gets hard for a man that means you are gay.

Also surely some animals are born retarded just like humans and probably can't tell apart sexes, maybe they are autistic animals, but they are not gay as in they will only ever exclusively seek out other male animals and not just randomly mount whatever is infront of them cause they are retarded. Don't believe what the jew scientists are peddling with "GAY I SO NATURAL EVEN ANIMALS DO IT!" Nah. Something is fucky with that animal on a whole other level. Maybe it's mother nature's way of preventing retard genes being spread.

A nice wall of text, but the same old anti-homo arguments as always. It'd be nice if people could just admit human sexuality is extremely complicated and that they don't have the answers.
I'm sorry you were molested. One thing I do believe is that you can't ungay yourself if you were diddled as a child. The only way out of the gay lifestyle is suicide.
 
Last edited:
I think it probably feels that way internally to any gay person
It may feel "normal" if it's all you ever felt. Memory is a funny thing, people claim to repress memories, perhaps most are faked or weird experiments by hypnotists etc. but I wouldn't be surprised if it was common. Simply following what you feel is a great way to damnation, and ideal for dragging people down with you: Jeremiah 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately corrupt; who can understand it?

Guys stop giving serious answers to a Q&A shitpost, the real reason homosexuality is a thing is because it's funny
I think it's a fair question, and you have an odd sense of humor. Thank you for prompting me to re-read the OP:
Why did it evolve as a trait in humans and some other mammals?
How was it shown to have evolved? Do we have ancient fossils of same sex couples or a gay gene frozen in ice or something LOL? Do mammals or other animals actually have similar attractions? I know animals hump or attack all sorts of things, but are there documented cases, in the wild, of animals engaging in same-sex acts that aren't just attacking/humping indiscriminately?

Because evolution is about populations, not individuals, and a chronic defect in the genetic code/hormone balance/socialization of individuals that soft-sterilizes ~4% of the population is absolutely fine in the larger view.
Evolution, as I understand it, is described as being about genes. Yes they are about populations, and individuals, but mostly in the context of the genes they pass on.
Sorry I didn't quote enough, then misrepresented you. Too many quotes LOL. Any loss in fertility could be catastrophic to a population over time, but given the issue is more common in men, and men traditionally reproduced less (as the ruling men typically had many wives, and many men had none), it could creep in without effecting overall fertility of a population at all. Assuming the theories are true. I have my doubts.

As I’ve said before, I wasn’t abused in anyway. You guys need to leave this argument in the 50s where it belongs.
I'm glad you didn't suffer abuse. Maybe you're right, this argument belongs in the past. Unfortunately due to the change from treating homosexual attraction as a disease/disorder to be studied and treated to just a natural "alternative" to heterosexuality or however they phrase the lie now, research into the field has essentially fallen to nothing as far as I'm aware, so this conversation can't really move forward now can it? May God guide us both, and everyone, to the truth.
 
Last edited:
Guys can be cool sometimes and so can ladies. I like men so I could understand why another guy would. I understand that women are hot and don't carry the same baggage guys do so I could understand why a woman wouldn't want to be straight. Honestly it's more difficult to get along with members of the opposite sex. I'd say the odds are against us being straight. Both have positives and negatives. Both are weighed and a decision is made.
 
Back
Top Bottom