- Joined
- May 28, 2024
I agree with this, of course I'd like to be with someone that enjoys the same things that I enjoy, but I disagreed with the negativity directed towards these women he had spoken to simply because they liked other things. The quote "So many foids are fucking brain rotted beyond saving" is the main thing I disagree with and what my posts are replying to. The hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness makes my retard brain whir.Mockery aside, I think it's important to try to look for NOT someone who matches your interests 100%, but someone who has enough in common (and it has to be something very core to yourself) that you can connect over, but enough differences that you can learn from each other.
Never look for just an Eggman "Now neither of us will be virgins" situation. Most people hate a lot about themselves, do you want someone who's just like you so you can hate them too?
But something in common you gotta have.
For a while I was with a woman, and though she was great and we liked each other intensely, neither of us liked anything that the other one liked. We didn't even share much in ways of life experience, values, opinions, etc. We just really liked each other as persons, and enjoyed each other's company a lot. That can carry you for a while, but sooner or later you start to feel the disconnect. So it fizzled out as we both realized we just weren't for each other, and that we had been keeping it going for its own sake, more than because it was going anywhere.
So, uh, if art is core to you, that's what you gotta look for. Sport, animals, a specific belief, whatever it is. Then explore her world and let her explore yours.
Idk what kind of women you're talking about bro but this is not my experience at all. Also, yeah, it makes sense that a woman wants to have some things in common with the guy she dates, right? Weren't you disparaging the fictional woman in your conversational scenario for liking The Notebook and a nigger band? Presumably this means that you want a relationship where you have things in common with your woman, yes? When I speak to someone and they have different interests from me they naturally fall into a separate category vs someone who does have the same interests as me, as the latter cannot engage with me the same way as the former can. This all makes sense. You are simply too autistic or you are purposefully digging for things to be annoyed about.The point I was trying to make, which I may not have communicated properly is modern relationships have this sort of 'vibe check'. If a foid remotely has dissimilar interests, any 'sexual' or 'deeper' relationship, beyond 'friend' or really more of an 'acquaintance', is immediately terminated (aka friend zoning). It is very very superficial. This 'vibe check' happens at that 'getting to know each other phase'. This ties back into hypergamy. Why should she, an arguably pretty young woman give her time to you, if you don't pass her 'vibe check'? It is far more easy for her to delete you as a possible sexual candidate and move on to the next moid, of which she has an EXTENSIVE backlog of. Why shouldn't she dig for that 'just right porridge'? This gets more depressing when you tie in mainstream media constantly repeating 'BE YOURSELF, DON'T HOLD BACK, BE AUTHENTICALLY YOU, YOU DEFINITELY WON'T FAIL A TEST YOU DIDN'T KNOW YOU WERE TAKING!!!"
Friends came out in the ninetiesClips of FRIENDS found their way into my doom scrolling. I never really watched the reruns when I was younger. It's shocking to see how casual hookup culture and near constant sex references were in regularly scheduled tv programming. I remember FRIENDS being on right after Full House, as if it was just another normal sitcom.
I know that not everyone is a cinemanigger, but you really have no idea the shit that was in theaters or on the TV if you think that Friends is remotely bad lmfao. More things that came out in the nineties, off the top of my head: Sex in the City, Lolita's second adaptation, American Pie, Girls Gone Wild, Eyes Wide Shut, Kids, and a whole host of other American and foreign films to boot that I could list but won't for brevity. Sex acts have been distributed since the invention of the camera. People weren't nearly as prudish in the past as right wing retards online like to portray.
>guilty of losing interest in a woman after fucking herI know I have been guilty of losing interest in a foid after getting in her pants. I am not proud of it.
It's just depressing how sex, love, and marriage have been blown apart so drastically in my lifetime.
>"sex, love, and marriage have been blown apart
You are the problem
Last edited:












