- Joined
- Aug 4, 2024
This won't scratch the competition itch, but here's another avenue to explore if you like writing papers about things you don't care for. Once a week, go find what's trending on Twitter, or TikTok, or some other retard hub. Throw that into Google Scholar, fall down a rabbit hole, then write a paper on that. Autodidacticism is the realm of the truly intelligent; you can be your own guide. I haven't heard your voice, so I can't say if it's actually bad or not, but you don't need YouTube to make money on what you learn. You could write books. My favorite author, Thomas Sowell, has published several books to elucidate the common man on topics that confound him. Maybe one day you'll have a rival to scratch that itch for competition. I've watched Veritasium videos to know this has happened multiple times throughout history among intellectual pioneers.
Sure, but I'm not sure I can explain it properly without sperging out. I'm sure you know that every organism fills an ecological niche, a role. Among certain species, including humans, there is enough sexual dimorphism that the niche is subdivided further. Manosphere types are hit or miss with their memes, but one thing they get right is that men's role is to protect and provide for a family. The current state of society doesn't allow them to do that, but the drive, the instinct is still there. Without the proper channels to fulfill that drive, men's behaviors are seen as "toxic" and there has been a sort of agenda to strip men of that inner manhood. There are still manly men in America, but there has been a growing number of atrophied men; they're the soyboys, the fuccbois, the gooners, coomers and doomers, and even larpers who make a big show about how manly they are.
The ideal of equality is insidious because it denies the individual his or her individuality. On the surface, however, it sounds great, and they pushed it onto women. They pointed out the superficial socio-economic differences between them and men, and asserted that those differences are wrong. I don't believe those differences are wrong, men and women are meant to play different roles in the family unit and in society, but that means they wouldn't be equal, and that's bad, axiomatically, to communism-minded people. As far as I can tell, women were only kept out of the workplace because somone had to mind the children and many of the workplaces were hazardous. Women occupied and even owned business when those two issues weren't in play. Many surnames come from professions: Cooper, Weaver, Tailor, Tanner, Cartman, Potter, etc. Women had their own titles: Webster, Brewster, Spinster, etc. The term "spinster" even became a label for unmarried, childless women who only had their career. Benjamin Franklin even hired a woman at one of his printing presses because she was capable in arithmetics, which he needed for book keeping. When he sold that press, he sold it to that woman, who then became the business owner. None of this was good enough evidence that women weren't second class citizens, so another sort of agenda came about to try to mold women into men for the sake of equality. A modern moniker for this is the "girl boss."
Several generations of these trajectories have produced emasculated men, and women who try to fill their shoes, but due to biological differences, are still often outpaced by men. I know correlation isn't causation, but you can't ignore that women's (and men's) overall happiness has declined with each wave of feminism. Neither sex is socially allowed, or even able (due to industrialization) to fulfill is role, thus, a sexless society, one big androgynous society. I was delighted to see someone else scratch the surface of this. This topic runs deep and it started generations ago, but I hope one day, men and women can have their gender roles back.
My man, I saw you in that thread where the lolicon wanted to buy a little girl. Your posts were interesting because they weren't the typical disgust reaction, they seemed smart, like you were coaxing out the demon to stand in the sunlight. There's a spark of something inside you. I don't know anything about you, but how you described your feelings sounds like imposter syndrome. Look into it and see if there's anyway to help you build confidence. Actually, confidence is downstream of competence. Whatever spark you have, you need to harness it and make it useful enough that you can stand proud on your accomplishments.
As for just being yourself, this is hard. Lots of people who are bizarre can't be themselves and appeal to others. You could be someone you're not, attract people with an alter ego, and it'll work at first, but your relationships will only be with your alter and not you. If you are a weirdo, I would say just be yourself, even if you never get whatever meme-gf you wish you had, because at least you'll be comfortable in your own skin. What I can say is that happiness is contagious (like every emotion), so live a good life you're proud of, find joy in the little things, and you'll attract people in general who might one day introduce you to a nice girl who appreciates you. This is for you. If audio books aren't your thing, get the paper version and use it like a text book.
Last edited:
what the fuck. Fuck that guy, I guess? No fatherhood for him?
Women in LATM are usually more direct but they also cheat and expect to be cheated on like crazy. Unless they're fuck ugly. 
