Where do Afghanistan’s refugees go? - Pakistan I guess

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Images of thousands of Afghans desperately trying to flee their country following a hasty U.S. withdrawal have provoked an international outcry.

As of Aug. 22, 2021, some 6,000 U.S. troops were working to evacuate U.S. military, American citizens and Afghans who are approved for Special Immigrant Visas. SIVs are a special program to protect Afghans who risked their lives working for U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

Germany, France, Italy and the U.K. are conducting smaller evacuation efforts for their nationals and some Afghans.

The pace of these poorly planned evacuations has been slow. They are taking place amid chaos in Kabul, where crowds are being confronted by violence from members of the now-ruling Taliban and U.S. forces and facing checkpoints that are near-impossible to pass.

Shaharzad Akbar, who leads the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, called the situation “failure upon failure.”

As a scholar specializing in forcible displacement and refugees, I see this harrowing scene unfolding within a broader context of Afghanistan’s long-standing displacement crisis. This includes an unequal sharing of refugees between the developed world and economically disadvantaged countries.

the-25-counties-accepting-the-most-afghan-refugees-in-2020.png


A muted US role​

The U.S. Refugee Act of 1980 standardized the procedures for admitting refugees – people who have fled war, violence, conflict or persecution – and put in place a rigorous vetting process. But over the past 40 years, U.S. acceptance rates for refugees worldwide have fallen significantly – from 200,000 admitted in 1980 to less than 50,000 in 2019.

Over the past 20 years, the U.S. admitted more than 20,000 Afghan refugees – an average of roughly 1,000 per year. But during the 2020-2021 fiscal year, just 11,800 refugees from around the world settled in the U.S. – among them were only 495 Afghan Special Immigrant Visa recipients. That number seems tiny compared to the approximately 20,000 Afghans who are currently in the pipeline waiting for a SIV and the additional 70,000 Afghans — including applicants and their immediate family members — who are eligible to apply.

Europe hosts few Afghan refugees​

For decades, Afghans have also migrated or fled to Europe. Between 2015-2016, 300,000 of them arrived on the continent. They were the second-largest group of refugees and asylum-seekers after Syrians. Asylum seekers are people seeking refugee status, but whose claim has yet to be evaluated.

The Afghan population across the European continent remains small and unevenly distributed. Up until the Taliban takeover of Kabul in August 2021, many Afghans were facing deportations. Germany is the largest European host, followed by Austria, France and Sweden.

For the first three months of 2021 about 7,000 Afghans were granted permanent or temporary legal status in the European Union. They are distributed between Greece, France, Germany and Italy, with smaller Afghan contingents in other EU states.

Australia – based on its 2016 census – has approximately 47,000 Afghans who are permanent residents, some of whom began arriving as early as 1979. Approximately another 4,200 Afghans have received temporary protected status.

Displaced within Afghanistan​

This still leaves an enormous number of Afghans who are displaced without a permanent home. More than half a million have already been displaced by the violence so far in 2021 according to the U.N. refugee agency. Some 80% of nearly a quarter of a million Afghans forced to flee since the end of May are women and children.

As of 2021 and prior to the current crisis, at least 3.5 million Afghans remained uprooted within Afghanistan because of violence, political unrest, poverty, climate crisis and lack of economic opportunity.

Four Afghan refugees enter Pakistan at a border crossing point marked by barbed wire while a man in army dress watches.
Afghan refugees enter into Pakistan through a border crossing point in Chaman while a Pakistani army soldier stands guard. AP Photo/uncredited photographer

Afghan refugees in Pakistan​

The vast majority of Afghan refugees do not settle in the West.

Pakistan, which shares a 1,640-mile land border with Afghanistan, has long absorbed the largest number of Afghan refugees even though it is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention or the 1967 Protocol. Within two years of the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, following the conflict ignited by the rise of the Mujahideen, 1.5 million Afghans had become refugees. By 1986, nearly five million Afghans had fled to Pakistan and Iran.

Since March 2002, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, or UNHCR, had repatriated nearly 3.2 million Afghans, but in April 2021, the United Nations reported that more than 1.4 million Afghan refugees remained in Pakistan due to ongoing violence, unemployment and political turbulence in Afghanistan.

Iran also remains a significant host for Afghans, with nearly 800,000 registered refugees and at least two million more who are unregistered. Smaller numbers of Afghan refugees and asylum-seekers are in India (15,689), Indonesia (7,692) and Malaysia (2,478).

Turkey – the world’s largest refugee host, with over 3.8 million registered Syrian refugees – has 980 registered Afghan refugees and 116,000 Afghan asylum-seekers.

A group of protesters march with Afghan flags
Despite the presence of the Taliban, a group of protesters march with Afghan flags during the country’s Independence Day rally in Kabul, Afghanistan on Aug. 19, 2021. Haroon Sabawoon/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

As it stands today​

The latest figures from the AP show that more than 47,000 Afghan civilians and at least 66,000 Afghan military and police forces have died in the 20-year-old Afghanistan war

The security situation in the country had been deteriorating in recent years. According to Brown University’s Cost of War Project, an increasing numbers of Afghans have been killed as a result of crossfire, improvised explosive devices, assassinations by militant groups including the Taliban, night raids by U.S. and NATO forces and U.S.-led airstrikes.

Even prior to the Taliban takeover of Kabul, civilian casualties had risen by 29% in the first quarter of 2021 compared with the same period in 2020. A U.N. report from July 26, 2021 found a 37% increase in the number of women killed and injured, and a 23% increase in child casualties compared with the first quarter of 2020.

With the Taliban takeover of Kabul, there is a growing concern for the safety of Afghanistan’s women and girls, ethnic minorities, journalists, government workers, educators and human rights activists. Many Afghans desperate to leave remain outside Kabul and far from any airport.

U.S. evacuations will likely end once all Americans are out of Afghanistan. A few other western countries have committed to taking in small numbers of refugees, including Canada (20,000) and the U.K. (20,000 over 5 years).

Still, adoption of hard-line policies and anti-refugee sentiments across much of Europe means that relatively few Afghans will find sanctuary on the continent. Austria and Switzerland have already refused to take in large numbers of Afghans. Turkey, already straining with refugees, said it does not want to become “Europe’s refugee warehouse.”

Other countries committing to take in Afghans temporarily in small numbers include Albania, Qatar, Costa Rica, Mexico, Chile, Ecuador and Colombia. Uganda, which already hosts 1.5 million refugees, mainly from South Sudan, has also agreed to take in 2,000 Afghans temporarily.

Ultimately, most Afghans able to leave the country will do so not in an aircraft, but on foot into Pakistan and Iran. Pakistan, already strained by its own economic and political struggles, will once again likely be the largest host for the most recently displaced Afghans.

But given that border crossings in the region are difficult and dangerous, the vast majority of uprooted Afghans will remain within Afghanistan’s borders. Their considerable humanitarian needs, economic and political challenges, security concerns and resistance to the Taliban will shape the next chapter of the country’s history.
 
"these figures dont include asylum seekers" the fuck?! dont all of them want asylum? how else would they enter the eu and get accepted?
It doesn't make much sense in America where we label everyone efugee and give them a free pass like moving countries is meant to be a casual act, but apparently if you follow international law a refugee is officially documented with someone as being confirmed a refugee, while asylum seekers are still applying to be refugees. It's not a description of the person's goals, it's a description of their legal status.

It makes more sense if you remember that there's a finite list of reasons traits you can be persecuted for in order to be a real refugee. It's more complicated than "I come from a shit hole".
 
Send them to Xinjiang - after all, China's reported that they're great at integrating Muslim populations such as the Uighurs!
Organ harvesting counts as Muslim integration when they're transplanted into Chinese people.

China has implemented the ultimate in cutting edge slavery: forcing someone to be your liver and filter trash out of your blood and administer any medicine you may take for a lifetime, or to be your heart and pump the blood through the body which oppresses the people it came from, and to pump blood into the brain which thinks only thoughts of contempt for your race.
 
Anywhere but the US. We're full already, fuck off.

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds: 'We're on board' to take Afghan refugees, working on preparations​

Ian Richardson
Des Moines Register

873d3ce6-65dd-4ec7-9cfa-0a282abbe8ca-8022e8e0-e2c6-4fc3-a62d-90b2111db3d4_thumbnail.png

Iowa is "on board and ready to go" to take in Afghan refugees fleeing their country, Gov. Kim Reynolds said Wednesday.
While she did not give a timetable for how soon that could occur, she said Iowa is working with U.S. Department of State on the process. The state is also working with local authorities to find families and homes to accommodate them.
"The message that I want to relay to Iowans is that we want to be a partner," Reynolds told reporters at the Iowa State Fair, where she appeared with fellow Republican U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst at the Iowa Pork Tent. "We want them to be here, and we want them to know that. And we'll work through those processes, whatever they may be."
Ernst, who told the Des Moines Register earlier this weekthat Iowa has a role to play in accepting Afghan refugees, said Wednesday she appreciates the governor's willingness to work on the issue.
"They're wonderful, they've supported our men and women in uniform, they love America, they are hard workers," she said. "We would love to welcome them to the state."



Residents of Afghanistan have been fleeing the country amid the turmoil after U.S. forces withdrew over the weekend and the Taliban quickly took control.
Asked how the situation with accepting Afghan refugees compares to her stance on accepting those who are crossing the southern border, Reynolds said it is "completely different."
Reynolds had taken criticism from Democrats in April when her administration declined a request from the federal government to assist with taking in unaccompanied migrant children from Central America who were in federal custody during a surge of people seeking to enter the U.S.
At the time, Reynolds and state officials had said that decision was due to limited state resources and administrative concerns.
"(The refugees) go through a process. They are vetted and then they come into the states," she said. "It's completely different than what's happening at the southern border — completely different."
Many of the families presenting themselves at the southern border do so seeking asylum, which has its own process but is legally different than applying for refugee status.
Reynolds' office said earlier this week that the state has resettled 94 Iraqi and Afghan special immigrant visa recipients since 2017. Reynolds did not give a number for how many the state expects to take in, or say where potential refugees would be resettled, but she said the state is continuing to have discussions.
Des Moines News
 
Well, its Covid. Cant take in more people. What if they have the epsilon variant or some shit?
 
Where do they go? We can house them all in 14 BC, so Chris can home to Barb hosting a bacha bazi party. Fuck Afghans, I hope they die in a ditch. They created this problem. The country sucks because they're proud of being filthy boy rapists.
 
Back
Top Bottom