Vinesauce

  • Thread starter Thread starter YI 457
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
i dont feel like scanning documents and tweets and such, I can tell you what to look for though.
I lied, I actually did feel like doing a bit of sleuthing. Nothing concrete but a few quick observations.

Referencing the original and redbard's doc.

- The usage of a double hyphen in both documents. While it's only used once in the original in this document, it's used much more commonly in Redbards google doc. Just weird because I don't see it often and it's a strange coincidence.

- There's similarities in the way both documents use commas in sentences.

- There's generally not a lot of prose in both documents.

-The original accusation document relies more heavily the use of '-ing' for the past tense where Redbards follows a more traditional approach. (-ed)

-The original accusation documents relies on longer sentences where Redbard's doc uses shorter and more fragmented sentences.

-The Redbard document makes heavy usage of parenthesis to provide additional context.

overall I don't think any of this can conclude anything, and if anything leads me to believe that Redbard did not, at the very least, write the content in the original document.
 
Last edited:
It's definitely a lawyer.


This case is Mental Health, because of alleged 'sexual harassment victims' recounting past experiences

Who in the inner circle lives in Southern Maine? That's where Prescott Lemoine is conducting his business


Why would they spend money to get a lawyer involved though? The document doesn't even mention anything illegal happening.

The more interesting part for me, is that Lemoine is the last name of Vic Mignogna's accuser's lawyer. Could be setting up for an anti-SLAPP case?

I still think it's meant to be purposefully misleading, included this info regardless.
 
Why would they spend money to get a lawyer involved though? The document doesn't even mention anything illegal happening.

In case Vinny decided to clap back with his own lawyer who could pick any flaws apart from the documents perhaps but also be confident in legal representation in case people started accusing however was responsible for slander
 
Why would they spend money to get a lawyer involved though? The document doesn't even mention anything illegal happening.
I think it's an alias, I seriously, seriously doubt a lawyer in Maine would care about Vinesauce.
If you go to the "Take that of the goddamn internet!" subforum in the Interior section you will find out that shitty lawyers and lawyer firms are more than willing to do hack jobs for a piss poor fee also its been mentioned before that Charonian is a rich bitch so its possible she could had pitched in, another alternative (which is often the case in the subforum) is that someone's uncle, father or simp runs a lawfirm and is perfectly ok with helping their spoiled brats win internet fights by trying to intimidate with invalid legal threats
 
It's definitely a lawyer.


This case is Mental Health, because of alleged 'sexual harassment victims' recounting past experiences

Who in the inner circle lives in Southern Maine? That's where Prescott Lemoine is conducting his business

i very much doubt that its a lawyer, if that was the case the entire legal case would be jeopardized by making it *the whole thing* public
it sounds very much like one of those *generic name generator.exe* vibes to it
 
The more interesting part for me, is that Lemoine is the last name of Vic Mignogna's accuser's lawyer. Could be setting up for an anti-SLAPP case?

I still think it's meant to be purposefully misleading, included this info regardless.

I think that's a reach. That name is so out there to be intentionally misleading, They would have used Vic's lawyer's full name if they wanted to be cheeky with an alias.
 
If anyone has the time to look through this, go for it.
Apologies for not putting this in a better format, KF apparently doesn't properly save drafts like I assumed.
-
1617669825665.png

https://archive.md/fL3Dy
Basically saying the spectrogram speculation is shit and the audio was spliced for time, which makes no sense because time isn't an issue when it comes to... proving somebody sexually assaulted you?
1617669959469.png

https://archive.md/zTlU5
This may have been happening since 2011, during the Chatango era, but of course.. no images nor screencaps nor any proof whatsoever.

And given this:
1617670058394.png

Grain of salt, boys.
-
As for Emopit, their tumblr is as follows:
1617670102089.png

1617670118987.png

https://archive.md/Fe8Mb
https://archive.md/BvHBo
https://archive.md/4IdUO
I'm gonna assume this is another nothingburger. Nothing new, nothing confirming shit, and she was 19. "It was gross but I wanted to meet him" =/= rape, imho.
That, and this came up, too, which is pretty thonk-inducing:
1617671218218.png

https://archive.md/bxSEA
 
Basically saying the spectrogram speculation is shit and the audio was spliced for time, which makes no sense because time isn't an issue when it comes to... proving somebody sexually assaulted you?
The excuse they are all giving is that this was a rushed job "there was a sense of urgency".
I think they wanted to strike while the recent GG drama was still hot so more people would be active looking for drama and prevent the flop that was the tumblr blog
That still doesn't excuse not putting the actual 2 hour call later on the document or next to it, you could had both for brevity and another one not chopped to hell for legitimacy
 
The excuse they are all giving is that this was a rushed job "there was a sense of urgency".
I think they wanted to strike while the recent GG drama was still hot so more people would be active looking for drama and prevent the flop that was the tumblr blog

That would mean @hi_yeena would factor more into this since she was tied to the GG drama apparently?
 
Can we talk more about this Prescott Lemoine guy? Google searches point towards some lawyer but according to the actual website tied to this law firm, the dude with the name Prescott has it as his first name, and a completely different surname, so I have no idea where the Lemoine part is from.


(probably didn’t need to be archived since they’re just some random lawyers who have nothing to do with this all but hey)

Is the owner of the audio file just using a made-up name or what? Would they think that far ahead enough to obfuscate their name despite not being tied to the document itself, but just the audio file?
 
The excuse they are all giving is that this was a rushed job "there was a sense of urgency".
I think they wanted to strike while the recent GG drama was still hot so more people would be active looking for drama and prevent the flop that was the tumblr blog
Then does this mean taht Mando is lying? He said the thing was in talks for MONTHS. And that they had to strike while the iron was hot due to the GG stuff. So if they were gathering this shit for MONTHS, and Mando heard the audio log's when he was first told MONTHS ago then.... what the fuck?

And if we assume that then Mando is lying about that does that mean he's got more involvement? Or was that like a six hour audio they very quickly cut up in the last two weeks to strike while the iron was hot with GG accusations? And does that mean that there might be a connection between the two that we're missing. Didn't mando say someone might have there rep hurt by the GG stuff so they wanted to push out the Vinesauce shit quickly?

 
Can we talk more about this Prescott Lemoine guy? Google searches point towards some lawyer but according to the actual website tied to this law firm, the dude with the name Prescott has it as his first name, and a completely different surname, so I have no idea where the Lemoine part is from.


(probably didn’t need to be archived since they’re just some random lawyers who have nothing to do with this all but hey)

Is the owner of the audio file just using a made-up name or what? Would they think that far ahead enough to obfuscate their name despite not being tied to the document itself, but just the audio file?

I too want to know who the hell is this Prescott Lemoine

I don't believe it's an alias. Is it possible for people out of state to hire lawyers online for cases like this?
 
The excuse they are all giving is that this was a rushed job "there was a sense of urgency".
I think they wanted to strike while the recent GG drama was still hot so more people would be active looking for drama and prevent the flop that was the tumblr blog
Which, in my opinion, makes no sense.
Cause if I had audio proof someone said they abused their power for sex, or whatever the fuck they're arguing for at this point, I'd rather show the ENTIRE THING than to risk my case being thrown the fuck out cause I decided to splice audio up to the point where entire sentences are even questionable.
This entire thing is a hackjob, anyway, so maybe they really didn't think far into what they did with the audio, if they're correct.
 
Which, in my opinion, makes no sense.
Cause if I had audio proof someone said they abused their power for sex, or whatever the fuck they're arguing for at this point, I'd rather show the ENTIRE THING than to risk my case being thrown the fuck out cause I decided to splice audio up to the point where entire sentences are even questionable.
This entire thing is a hackjob, anyway, so maybe they really didn't think far into what they did with the audio, if they're correct.
if they were confident in their claims they would just release the unedited audio, since they arent a lot of the cuts can be assumed to be splicing multiple conversations together to spin a narrative.
 
Can we talk more about this Prescott Lemoine guy? Google searches point towards some lawyer but according to the actual website tied to this law firm, the dude with the name Prescott has it as his first name, and a completely different surname, so I have no idea where the Lemoine part is from.


(probably didn’t need to be archived since they’re just some random lawyers who have nothing to do with this all but hey)

Is the owner of the audio file just using a made-up name or what? Would they think that far ahead enough to obfuscate their name despite not being tied to the document itself, but just the audio file?
How long until some anon contacts this law firm probing for answers?
 
Back
Top Bottom