Observotron
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2019
I lied, I actually did feel like doing a bit of sleuthing. Nothing concrete but a few quick observations.i dont feel like scanning documents and tweets and such, I can tell you what to look for though.
Referencing the original and redbard's doc.
- The usage of a double hyphen in both documents. While it's only used once in the original in this document, it's used much more commonly in Redbards google doc. Just weird because I don't see it often and it's a strange coincidence.
- There's similarities in the way both documents use commas in sentences.
- There's generally not a lot of prose in both documents.
-The original accusation document relies more heavily the use of '-ing' for the past tense where Redbards follows a more traditional approach. (-ed)
-The original accusation documents relies on longer sentences where Redbard's doc uses shorter and more fragmented sentences.
-The Redbard document makes heavy usage of parenthesis to provide additional context.
overall I don't think any of this can conclude anything, and if anything leads me to believe that Redbard did not, at the very least, write the content in the original document.
Last edited: