Ubisoft Sellout - Bankruptcy Speedrun Any% Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
fucking is physical labor. they just got paid well enough to get plump for their big dick pirate patrons
People in the past, no matter the location or culture, did not find fat women attractive (barring niggers, but they're not human).

Why are we arguing about the historically accurate plumpness of whores when Ubisoft have made it clear they'll happily retcon history when it suits them to make a slave the best samurai in all of Nippon.
Let's not forget the gigabrains at Ubisoft made Marx an Assassin sympathizer, despite the fact his own manifesto clearly states that one of the steps towards achieving True Communism is the establishment of a dictatorship to steal everyone's stuff away, while Washington is portrayed as a tyrant in a DLC.

Bismarck should have razed Paris and everyone in it to the ground when he had the chance. Louis XVI should have unleashed the army upon the mob, instead of hesitating and showing mercy because they were his subjects.
 
I know there are some Div 2 players ITT. I'm curious after the escalation/prototype stuff, and then the BS with the Cherry Blossom event, if any of you quit or are you still playing? I basically noped out earlier this season, but today's patch got me to try it again, only to realise they've fucked it up again, and now I think I'm basically done for at least the rest of this season if not entirely (since I don't see them changing course at this point)
 
while Washington is portrayed as a tyrant in a DLC.
I think it was AC4, but slavery is one of the entries in the codex. Within the entry the two characters that operate the animus argue about Washington owning slaves.
>A: washington owned slaves
>B: well he did free them when he passed
>A: that wasnt good enough, why didnt he release them immediately

The combination of the lefty purity test (you are never good enough) and completely skipping over the political complexity the founding fathers had to navigate regarding slavery is infuriating. Even back then, when I was younger and more idealistic, I thought it was extremely cheap soapboxing.
 
Back
Top Bottom