TV Tropes community

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Uncanny Valley said:
View attachment 255011

why the fuck was this on a page for a little kids show
Click to expand...

DOBSOOOOOOOON!!
bisoooon.jpg
 

Attachments

  • bisoooon.jpg
    bisoooon.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 204
Their page for "X-Pac heat" (a professional wrestling term for when fans hate a wrestler because he's boring rather than because he's a heel) used to be a lot more autistic.

They've since cleaned it up and it's now strictly wrestling-related, but it used to have examples from other media. I remember them sperging about some episode of Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends on it among other things. It used to be a clone of "dethroning moment of suck."
 
Last edited:
Darwin Watterson said:
Their page for "X-Pac heat" (a professional wrestling term for when fans hate a wrestler because he's boring rather than because he's a heel) used to be a lot more autistic.

They've since cleaned it up and it's now strictly wrestling-related, but it used to have examples from other media. I remember them sperging about some episode of Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends on it among other things. It used to be a clone of "dethroning moment of suck."
Click to expand...

There are a bizarre amount of wrestling references in TVTropes' trope nomenclature.
 
Kinkshamer said:
Tropers talk about the article on Americans having a negative view of BLM.

Of course, being the embodiment of nerds with white guilt and autism, they think it's because of racism and white privilege.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13067440860A98240100&page=561

jUMK1Hn.png


orsRGX5.png


It's almost like they didn't even read the article.
Click to expand...

yeah right. when was feminism for "men" anyway? this reminds me when feminist keep on thinking that patriarchy hurts everyone to justify why they claim to be for men's right, which is bull crap i might add. the only men who identify as feminist are nothing more bet males with male guilt.
 
Its weird how in the US people constantly complain about how powerfull racism is to the point that its apparently institutionalised.I guess the fact that Obama was president for 8 years is something that didn't figure in anyone's calculus.If racism was this powerfull force then i doubt Obama would have even made it beyond the Illinois Senate.Apparently there is some vast racist conspiracy in the US that spends all day and night keeping minorities down.
 
Kinkshamer said:
It's almost like they didn't even read the article.
Click to expand...

If it was something like 1% of black people who didn't like BLM either, you could write them off as some kind of Uncle Ruckus stereotypes, but 17% for something supposedly in their own best interests is a lot.
 
tigerlilly said:
yeah right. when was feminism for "men" anyway? this reminds me when feminist keep on thinking that patriarchy hurts everyone to justify why they claim to be for men's right, which is bull crap i might add. the only men who identify as feminist are nothing more bet males with male guilt.
Click to expand...

Feminism is for men when feminists are trying to recruit men to feminism. It helps make their movement look bigger. This is related to when you see SJW types saying "feminism is just about equality, if you believe men and women are equal, you're a feminist".

iafiv said:
Its weird how in the US people constantly complain about how powerfull racism is to the point that its apparently institutionalised.I guess the fact that Obama was president for 8 years is something that didn't figure in anyone's calculus.If racism was this powerfull force then i doubt Obama would have even made it beyond the Illinois Senate.Apparently there is some vast racist conspiracy in the US that spends all day and night keeping minorities down.
Click to expand...

(((Institutionalized racism)))
 
Save the Loli said:
Feminism is for men when feminists are trying to recruit men to feminism. It helps make their movement look bigger. This is related to when you see SJW types saying "feminism is just about equality, if you believe men and women are equal, you're a feminist"
Click to expand...

There's a term for that. It's called Love Bombing. They inculcate you into their ideology by giving you a very vague and flowery description of their goals, do everything they can to make you feel welcome within their fold and when you finally bite the bullet and decide to identify as one of them, that's when they hit you with what what they expect from you as a member.

"If you believe in equality of the sexes, then you're a feminist. Oh, so you agree that you are indeed a feminist now that you've heard my description of the term? Excellent! Now, if you'll just sign this petition to redistribute men's wages to their female co-workers and... wait you're not going to sign? I thought you were a feminist! If you really cared about equality, you'd sign away your rights!"

Deadwaste said:
systemic oppression
Click to expand...

 
Last edited:
8biwbVs.png


From the "Complete Monster" cleanup thread. Context is that they're discussing the proper pages to pipe to if a character deemed a complete monster is a pedophile. There was no provocation for this little rant. He could've just said "I'd rather use the term 'child molester' myself" and been done with it.

Guess we know who's been picking from the kids' menu.
 
Darwin Watterson said:
8biwbVs.png


From the "Complete Monster" cleanup thread. Context is that they're discussing the proper pages to pipe to if a character deemed a complete monster is a pedophile. There was no provocation for this little rant. He could've just said "I'd rather use the term 'child molester' myself" and been done with it.

Guess we know who's been picking from the kids' menu.
Click to expand...
This idiot can split hairs all he wants, it's still fucking gross.

Also "child molester is not necessarily a pedophile"? That makes no sense; I'm pretty sure child molesters do it because they're attracted to children in some capacity.
 
Baldur's Gait said:
This idiot can split hairs all he wants, it's still fucking gross.

Also "child molester is not necessarily a pedophile"? That makes no sense; I'm pretty sure child molesters do it because they're attracted to children in some capacity.
Click to expand...

It's the old "all elephants are gray but not all gray things are elephants" argument. Except all child molesters are pedophiles but all pedophiles aren't child molesters yet.
 
Baldur's Gait said:
This idiot can split hairs all he wants, it's still fucking gross.

Also "child molester is not necessarily a pedophile"? That makes no sense; I'm pretty sure child molesters do it because they're attracted to children in some capacity.
Click to expand...

FierceBrosnan said:
It's the old "all elephants are gray but not all gray things are elephants" argument. Except all child molesters are pedophiles but all pedophiles aren't child molesters yet.
Click to expand...
Rape is sometimes about creating feeling of power for the rapist rather than sexual attraction, but this sounds suspiciously defensive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom