TV Tropes community

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Gingervitis said:
View attachment 2071892
Click to expand...
Crybaby Xianghua said:
Oh no, a female character being a sexual being and choosing to flaunt her sexuality. HEAVEN FORBID SHE DO THAT!

I have the feeling the person who wrote this article makes uglification fetish art of attractive female characters, as a way to keep them so called "shallow doodbroo fanbois" away from their favorite female character. It's almost like this person likes an attractive female character or two, but is in denial or shame of it, because he is a soy boy simp or something.
Click to expand...
Frank D'arbo said:
Oh fuck off neo puritan

I'm telling you it never ends this shit
Click to expand...
I Love Beef said:
Yeah, they're stripperific because back then, people had what is known as a sex drive, which ties into the survival instinct, and is why the warrior women you see in Trials of Mana are scantily clad. Wearing heavy armor all the time also is physically exhaustive and counter productive to ensuring the stamina and morale of warriors, and some tribes of warrior and barbarian women had them fought in little to no clothing in history.

Fucking beta pedant enochs.
Click to expand...
I still can't believe these are the same people who claim to be sex-positive (to the point of being coomers), who rabidly support pornography & sex work and are generally supportive of women in the real world (& men in both fiction & IRL) flaunting their sexuality & dressing in skimpy outfits, but fictional women flaunting their sexuality & dressing in skimpy outfits? Oh no, it all "sexism" & "objectification" then. And they have the nerve to mock the likes of The Quartering, No Bullshit, Geeks+Gamers, OAG & BlackDGamer1 for acting like coomers & complaining about the lack of sexy women in fiction nowadays (something which they, the leftoids, caused with their constant objectification sperging. Also, not defending most of aformentioned anti-sjws btw. I realise they can be just as cringey as the SJWs they criticise. Though when wokies dunk on the likes of these people, it's usually either for the wrong reasons or for them saying/doing stuff that SJWs/leftists have done worse. IMHO, BlackDGamer1 was the most reasonable out of the bunch, this coming from someone who followed him on Twiiter for a while. Though this didn't stop the Slicon Valley Overlords from eventually suspending his account).
Though from what I've heard, the leftoids have toned down this attitude recently (some even denying they or any leftist ever had it) to the point where we're starting to see a gradual return of sexy fictional women with Resident Evil' Village's Lady Dimitrescu and at least one online leftist praising the shit out of her.
It is funny how these people never applied the "male gaze is objectifying & bad" to furries & their art, a good chunk of which is animal women with curvaceous figures and big boobs/asses (In fact, I believe Anita actually received a backlash from her own side for targeting Krystal from Star Fox). And of course as we all know, they never apply the "objectification bad" mentality to men (female warriors wearing chainmail bikini is considered "objectifing" & "impractial" but not male warriors wearing literally nothing to cover their well muscled chests).

What I'm really curious about is how these "muh objectification" Sarkeesi-stan types missed the Shantae series? Even the heinous harridan herself never talked about or mentioned Shantae even though it's everything she & her cronies hate. Every girl in those games, including the titular heroine and even some of the game's enemies, is scantly-clad, has an hourglass figure (no body positivity here) and even jiggling boobs (and even worse, the series was made by a man😮). Really, it should've been a prime target for these "muh objectification" types, but it somehow (fortunately) flew under their radar.
 
Mr Metron666 said:
What I'm really curious about is how these "muh objectification" Sarkeesi-stan types missed the Shantae series?
Click to expand...
I think I've seen Tumblr types redraw her as a Muslim in a hijab. I don't know anything about Shantae but she's a djinn, right? In their mind Djinn = Arabian, Arabs = Muslims.
Mr Metron666 said:
And of course as we all know, they never apply the "objectification bad" mentality to men (female warriors wearing chainmail bikini is considered "objectifing" & "impractial" but not male warriors wearing literally nothing to cover their well muscled chests).
Click to expand...
Honestly, I agree with the common counter argument to this, that most women don't get excited for generic buff man in the same way you can simply draw a scantily clad female character for easy male coombait and that these male characters as far as Western media goes are the result of male artists drawing male power fantasies - or what they think is cool. Not a lot of nerdy girls have made He-Man or Conan their husbando. But yes they're very selective about who they apply this mentality to.
 
BroccoliBrain said:
Honestly, I agree with the common counter argument to this, that most women don't get excited for generic buff man in the same way you can simply draw a scantily clad female character for easy male coombait and that these male characters as far as Western media goes are the result of male artists drawing male power fantasies - or what they think is cool. Not a lot of nerdy girls have made He-Man or Conan their husbando. But yes they're very selective about who they apply this mentality to.
Click to expand...
That would be more believable if there wasn't a gajillion romance novel covers out there arguing otherwise.

Or the the moans that escape their mouths when Twilight movie #2 released or Chris Hemsworth took off his shirt in Thor.
 
From The Uncanny Valley said:
REAL LIFE = SCARIER!!!
Click to expand...
NerdShamer said:
First 2 levels of Sonic 3: Vietnam.

Suicide warning in the last Zelda game.

A edutainment game is traumatic.
Click to expand...
Man, these people need to grow a pair lmfao
I remember playing Sonic 3 & Knuckles as a kid and not once did I got frightened by the jungle getting burned down.
And it's all because of the music, while a bit more dour than its first act counterpart, it still pumps you up and encourages you to speed up after Eggman. There's no way you can get scared by that.
And Baldi's Basics? Nigga that game don't even look like its a horror game.
 
NerdShamer said:
First 2 levels of Sonic 3: Vietnam.
Click to expand...
iki.gif


Mr Metron666 said:
I still can't believe these are the same people who claim to be sex-positive, but fictional women flaunting their sexuality & dressing in skimpy outfits? Oh no, it all "sexism" & "objectification" then.
Click to expand...
munn.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom