- Joined
- Jul 19, 2016
I describe myself as a zoophile because zoophilia does not mean that one engages in sexual activity with animals. Zoophilia is a term that refers to sexual attraction to animals, where people take it from there is another matter.
🦊 Furry Trybal Wolf / Familiar Lupine - Prideful zoophiliac
- Thread starter Jaiman
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
I describe myself as a zoophile because zoophilia does not mean that one engages in sexual activity with animals. Zoophilia is a term that refers to sexual attraction to animals, where people take it from there is another matter.
V
VJ 120
Guest
kiwifarms.net
If it's just a fetish you don't intend to act upon then why do you insist that it's actually a "sexual orientation"? Calling it a sexual orientation implies that you intend to fuck and have "relationships" with animals.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2016
I can see how you would have that impression. Yes you could definitely consider it a fetish, though I guess it is all a matter of how far someone takes it.
What for me may be a fetish would for another be a valid (though deviant) sexual orientation. It all still falls under the term "Zoophilia".
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2015
So is it a fetish or an orientation? You can't just make things up for your sake to make you look better. A zoophile is someone who takes part in zoophilia and zoophilia is an abnormal fondness for animals to put it lightly.
José Mourinho
The Special One
Forum Staff
Retired Staff
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Do you preface by saying you like the idea of fucking dogs?
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2015
I'm mildly surprised about how @Familiar Lupine is handling all of the attention that he's receiving from the forum. It reminds me a lot of the incident we had with that one person who thought he was a menstruation pad or something.
If you don't mind me asking, why are you so open with your sexuality? You seem to have a great degree of self-awareness (to a point) and you're certainly more mature than the average Internet denizen, but at the same time you've put that you're a zoophile and stuff like that on the same social media account that you've put selfies and your current location on. You openly call yourself Trybal without any irony in real life. It seems a bit baffling that you're very well-aware of how insane this all is and yet you go along with it anyway. I mean, even disregarding the whole furry shit, there's a lot of issues regarding openly posting your location and stuff on social media regarding privacy and whatnot.
Other than that, you seem like a pretty chill guy. Honestly, all this attention will probably die down because the Farms gets bored when our lolcows don't chimp out.
If you don't mind me asking, why are you so open with your sexuality? You seem to have a great degree of self-awareness (to a point) and you're certainly more mature than the average Internet denizen, but at the same time you've put that you're a zoophile and stuff like that on the same social media account that you've put selfies and your current location on. You openly call yourself Trybal without any irony in real life. It seems a bit baffling that you're very well-aware of how insane this all is and yet you go along with it anyway. I mean, even disregarding the whole furry shit, there's a lot of issues regarding openly posting your location and stuff on social media regarding privacy and whatnot.
Other than that, you seem like a pretty chill guy. Honestly, all this attention will probably die down because the Farms gets bored when our lolcows don't chimp out.
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2016
'Digital therian'? So you like, believe your real body is stuck in Second Life, right?
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2016
From what I can gather, I think his legal first name is actually Trybal. I am surprised with an unusual first name like that, that all his info hasn't already been dumped.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2016
@SpacePanther Is it a fetish or an orientation you ask? After looking into it a bit I would say that zoophilia is a fetish if we are using the strictest definition of both "fetish" and "sexual orientation". Sexual orientation differs from a fetish in that it is a bit of a subfolder. Sexual orientation deals with the gender to which an individual is attracted. Thus homosexual, heterosexual, and bisexual are valid sexual orientations, while "zoo-sexual" would not be.
If it seems as though this goes against some of my previous views, it does. Your question prompted me to do some further research to find a distinction between two terms that I had never considered separating. Thank you. I appreciate that.
We could however take this in an interesting direction... Is a heterosexual male, just a male with a fetish for human females? While we have invalidated my previous claim that zoophilia could be a sexual orientation, I would be interested to see if anyone could find evidence to prove that sexual orientations themselves are not based in fetishes.
@Sophiya though I have a tumblr account that I created a few years ago, I am not a Tumblr user. As far as social media platforms go, I feel it is very difficult to find one with a more poorly designed format.
To answer your question, I was not aware of a bestiality thread existing on Tumblr, and I don't really care to look into it.
@Alan Pardew, were you to read through the pages of this thread and read my replies to the previous questions that have been posed, I think you could assume that no, I do not preface anything with that. But, since it seems you have failed to look into the content of this thread before posting such a question: No. I do not fuck dogs, therefore I would have no reason to preface with that.
@Sanae Kochiya You are right in saying that I am open about my sexuality, but it doesn't come close to stopping there. I am open about everything in my life.
You see, being raised the way I was, I had two options: conform and be brainwashed by the toxic religious crowd I was surrounded in, or internalize everything, hide everything that was dear to me, in an attempt to keep from losing myself. If it is not yet apparent, I took the latter route.
When I was finally outed and expelled from the community and family in which I was raised, I vowed to never hide again. In hiding and internalizing it seemed I had only hurt both myself and those I loved, (and had at that point lost). From the moment I left home, I was an open book. Everything was on the table.
I understand the horror many would feel at being open to the degree that I am, but to be honest, I have no reason not to be.
I do nothing illegal, and nothing outside of the morals and ethics of the majority. I may have attractions and interests that lie on the fringe, but when it comes to how I actually live my life, I have nothing to hide. I am open, not out of ignorance, but because it is through my openness that others can see who I really am. You said that I seem like a pretty chill guy. I am. I don't bite, and I don't fuck dogs.
It is said that sex sells, that is perhaps one of the truest statements ever made. I was unsure coming here whether or not it was worth it, whether my opening up and showing you all who I really am would in any way change the way you guys view me. Sex sells, and the true me, the me that wasn't presented in the first two and a half pages of this thread, really isn't quite as taboo or exciting as you may have initially believed.
I think you are right. This will all die down soon, and in time I will just be another regular on this forum, the only memory of this being the 100 or so negative ratings on my profile.
I hope this clarifies things a bit. I am always up to answering any addition questions you have.
@somethingfowl Yeah no, allow me to explain that bit...
Therians and otherkin are in interesting bunch. For the vast majority the belief that they are not 100% human seems to stem from some sort of mental disorder. Although, if 31.5% of the worlds population are Christian and believe that there is some being up in the sky that will send most of the world to hell "because he loves them so much", then perhaps believing that you are part platypus isn't so odd after all.
I consider myself a digital therian. Here is why:
Before this technological age, there were a few distinct parts of a person. There was the physical self, the mental, and some would add a spiritual self or soul. The physical is the self that the world sees, the mental makes of the personality and other associated qualities of the individual, and the spiritual or soul, that needs no explaining. After the digital age began, a third (or fourth, if you count a spiritual self) self appeared. This was the digital self.
Your digital self is your footprint in the internet, your mark left on the digital world. It is every word you have typed on a forum, and every photo or drawing you have ever identified by. It is who the digital world knows you to be. To me the digital self is just as valid as the physical or any other part of me, if not more. The digital should outlive any trace of my physical self. Thus I view it as the most important aspect of my being and equally valid to every other part.
If I believed that my physical self was an animal, I would consider myself a therian. Same with the mental or spiritual parts. For me, my digital self is completely animal. Since my digital self, (a piece of me that I value just as much as any other part) is an animal, I consider myself a digital therian. Once I die and all memory of me is gone, the digital will be all that remains, the animal, the part of me that I loved the most.
Need I say that I am a transhumanist?
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2016
I don't know, I can kind of see @Familiar Lupine's point with this. A homosexual man who stayed a virgin all his life because he never found a circumstance in which he was comfortable having sex with a man would still be a gay man, right? Orientation is based purely on attraction in most people's minds. Is not a gay priest sworn to celibacy still resisting the temptation to have sex with men, not women? He never intends to act upon it, but the internal attraction is still for men.
For this dude, it's dogs. Which is a whole other issue in and of itself but I can see what he is arguing at least. His logic is internally consistent, so from his perspective there is no reason to see it as a "fetish" in simple terms.
- Joined
- May 12, 2014
@Familiar Lupine I'm curious if you ever fixed the relationship with your parents and how it functions now?
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2015
Fair enough. You clearly seem content with what you're doing and I'm in no position to police someone on how to live their life.
I only advise caution when you are open about everything. Not only will putting your sexual deviance front and center make future employment opportunities rather... quirky, but broadcasting your location on social media can have far less... desirable outcomes. This isn't like saying you're at Comic Con or something like that; one of your Tweets was where you lived. You don't exactly have to be a rocket scientist to point out exactly what's fucking wrong with that.
Lolcow or no, you aren't someone reprehensible like Nick Bate and I have no desire to see something tragic happen to you. Exercise some caution and don't disclose everything. It's great that you're proud of yourself and that kind of willingness to stick up for what you love is admirable (in a sense), but there's a fine line between not caring what other people think and broadcasting to the world where you store your valuables.
Other than that, should still be dark where you're at, so I hope you have a good night.
G
GS 281
Guest
kiwifarms.net
East Lansing? Yeah, he fits in at MSU
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2016
Attraction to the opposite sex evolved as (a necessary) part of sexual reproduction. In all species that reproduce sexually, opposite sex sexual attraction is the norm. In humans homosexuality occurs in roughly 3% of the population.
"So is homosexual attraction a fetish?", I hear you asking. No it isn't because there is more to homosexuality than sexual intercourse with a member of the same sex. Homosexuals have the same sorts of relationships as heterosexuals (with the exception of procreation), i.e. they have short-term relationships, long-term relationships, they emotionally bond, they co-parent, they cohabit etc. A fetish lacks these social and emotional aspects.
A person with an amputee fetish (acrotomophilia)--for example--isn't interested in the person with the stump, they are interested in the stump itself. This abstracted erotic specificity is characteristic of fetishes and is unlike heterosexuality and homosexuality.
Zoophilia is a fetish (or paraphilia) for similar reasons. A dog is incapable of reciprocating in a manner that a heterosexual (or homosexual) partner is able to do so. You can't have a romantic relationship with a dog nor can a dog even reciprocate erotic attraction as a human experiences it. Even if you train a dog to fuck you it is still not experiencing the human subjectivity that is associated with erotic attraction. Zoophiles fool themselves into thinking they are different from fetishists that fetishize some non-living/inanimate thing, e.g. mylar balloon, female footwear etc., but they are really no different--the psychology is the same. You can't have a romantic relationship with a dog for the same reasons you can't have one with a mylar balloon or a stump. The dog to the zoophile is the same as the stump to the acrotomophiliac--it's just a thing that produces sexual arousal.
To preempt a likely response, no it doesn't matter that you are really fascinated and interested in dogs. Fetishists are typically fascinated and obsessed with their fetish object (see for example https://kiwifarms.net/threads/mylarballoonfan.442/ ).
The problem with so-called "virtuous pedophiles" and "virtuous zoophiles" is that they both have urges to engage in conduct that is harmful to another party, children and animals respectively. A normal person--one with a working conscience--that experiences an urge say, to hurt children, would seek psychiatric help to address that because the urge is egodystonic, i.e. it causes emotional distress because it conflicts with their self-concept as a "good person".
You, however, are a proud zoophile and your urge to hurt animals is so egosyntonic, i.e. consistent with your self-concept, that you interpret your urge to hurt dogs as an urge to love dogs. Your apologia is identical to that of "virtuous pedophiles" and that is why many of us here think you are a sick fuck ticking time-bomb. If you weren't profoundly disordered you would have sought psychiatric help to at least reduce your urge to have sex with dogs.
Lastly, you haven't addressed this:
- Joined
- May 25, 2016
@Alan Pardew 's statement was a reference to a post that fellow Kiwi Farms user @TranLord had made, and is a running gag on this site. It was stated for comedic effect.
Back on topic, do you exhibit dog-like behaviors occasionally in your spare time when no one's around or do you just behave like normal people do?
EDIT: Thank you for the correction @AnOminous
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
He wasn't joking, though.
Y
YI 457
Guest
kiwifarms.net
lol u sad loveshy.
So, you're assuming everyone is shallow. Why.
Pleaaaaase, write a book. This is hypnotic. We got enthusiastic writers here. Like @Connor Bible. He could help you.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2016
@CyrusKissFanClub Thank you for your reply. It was most interesting to read. I guess in the case of zoophilia as a paraphilia, the dog would be viewed the same as an inanimate object as we will assume it cannot reciprocate.
Regarding being a ticking time bomb, do not possess an urge to have sex with animals, just an attraction to them. If I were to feel myself subject to urges like you describe, or compelled to act on such attraction, then I would definitely seek outside help as it would then be necessary.
To address the youtube comment, I do like knots. But I prefer them to be silicone. Most of the comments on the video were by people who were rather horrified, I was more fishing for a funny response than anything else.
I am a furry and may at times exhibit animalistic behavior but this is more more of a behind closed doors/bedroom thing than out in the world.
The only thing you might notice about me out in the world might be that my first exclamation when in pain might sound more like a yelp than a shout.
Thank you for the compliment on my writing. I just try to put things in a way that will be easily understood. I have actually been looking to write a book for a few weeks now. Had an interesting idea for one that I have been mulling over... (and no, it is not about fucking dogs.)
I do not assume that everyone is shallow. Were I to, I would see no reason to step foot outside or engage in activity or communication with anyone. I do however assume that 85+% of people are shallow. I have yet to see reason to change this assumption as so far it has been accurate. It is astounding, the number of people you have to go through to find one who can conduct themselves well and communicate well enough to hold a meaningful conversation.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2015
So how many Bad Dragon dildos so you have?