Jacques1194
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2023
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When in history was this ever the case outside of societies with a third gender (which is usually for spiritual reasons and not because they want to troon out)?"Used to be commonly accepted that sex is changeable"
When in history was this ever the case outside of societies with a third gender (which is usually for spiritual reasons and not because they want to troon out)?
They're probably thinking of that one episode of Night Court where Dan's friend became a woman.When in history was this ever the case outside of societies with a third gender (which is usually for spiritual reasons and not because they want to troon out)?
What every one of these activists is failing to realize is that we, the general public, are not being gaslit by people in power. JK Rowling isn't changing anyone's mind about trans issues and neither is The New York Times. This is the reality of how the average anglosphere citizen feels about trans issues. It's cosmetic care for a first world problem, and while in a vacuum most of us are fine with "sane" adults seeking that "care" (relatively sane), kiddie sex changes and womens' spaces were never on the table. These topics were never even in the same room as the table. Each day these two fronts are unsuccessfully pressed is a day that the general public becomes more fatigued with these histrionic faggots, and at this point we're happy that there's chatter about insane asylums coming back. We do not want blood, but our grandfathers were definitely wise to strip them of voting rights and keep them out of the general public.In turn, Mr. Strangio has shifted course, presenting a countervailing argument to the court of public opinion:
He has blamed the Skrmetti loss on The New York Times.
Mr. Strangio blamed the Times at a speaking engagement in Provincetown, Mass. He has blamed the Times in popular queer podcasts, pointing to what he said is the paper’s “role in the current, very successful anti-trans panic.” And even before Skrmetti was decided, Mr. Strangio laid the groundwork for this name-and-shame campaign by heaping blame on the Times in interviews for a buzzy new documentary, Heightened Scrutiny.
"wealth disparity" is not a real thing in that there is no good reason to think that there should be equal distribution among actual producers and couch potatoes.wealth disparity,
Rest assured, I am a capitalist. I am simply of the opinion that this game of Monopoly has ended and I'm chomping at the bit to start another game. But this is not the proper venue for this kind of debate."wealth disparity" is not a real thing in that there is no good reason to think that there should be equal distribution among actual producers and couch potatoes.
Propaganda does play a role in shaping public opinion, but what even has Rowling done? She's funded some legal cases that were already going to happen and she's made some tweets. As worthy as those things are, I don't see how those things by themselves are going to make large swathes of otherwise friendly or neutral citizens suddenly start hating trannies. If a tranny found a magic lamp and wished that JK Rowling had never donated a dime to any feminist causes public opinion would have remained the same, some women would have been left high and dry and that's about it.What every one of these activists is failing to realize is that we, the general public, are not being gaslit by people in power. JK Rowling isn't changing anyone's mind about trans issues and neither is The New York Times.
Correct, but the problem is that in Western society the inequality in distribution goes the exact opposite way you'd expect, where we're paying minorities/ethnics tens or hundreds of thousands a year to sit on their asses and do nothing while white men have to kill themselves working 16 hours a day at three jobs to make ends meet."wealth disparity" is not a real thing in that there is no good reason to think that there should be equal distribution among actual producers and couch potatoes.
Correct, but the problem is that in Western society the inequality in distribution goes the exact opposite way you'd expect, where we're paying minorities/ethnics tens or hundreds of thousands a year to sit on their asses and do nothing while white men have to kill themselves working 16 hours a day at three jobs to make ends meet.
This thread is not the place for your lukewarm takes on how troons are ashkully a distraction from the real issue of wealth disparity.wealth disparity
"illegal intimidation" lol, lmao even. These dumbfucks want to be oppressed so badly holy fuck; "what do you mean I can't give children dangerous and experimental plastic surgery and hormone replacement therapy???". I can't wait for the day that this retarded movement eats shit and every person who ever advocated for it will feel like the people who supported the idea of the lobotomy.17 Decmocrat led states have asserted a constitutional right to troon out the kids.
The movement is already faltering in the shithole troonland that is the UK? troons seriously burned through whatever patience people had left for them very quickly.The most significant part of this ruling is that its the first since the FWS/Supreme Court ruling that troons are men, and it had a direct impact on this case.
The troons rights movement is the result of the gay community becoming too accepting in the late 2000s and 2010s resulting in them (out of pity and guilt tripping) supporting it. The DNC of course picked this up to be contrarian and then astroturfed the fuck out of it and used it as an excuse to put more shit into the fraudulent dump that was USAID.If by "real" you mean completely made up and fallacious with unsound assumtions and faulty reasoning you would be onto something.
When do we predict that this movement will for the most part cease to get any amount of support from the US government?In any event, #WINNING
First we'd need a lot of politicians backtracking and out of office. Best guesstimate is between 5 to 20 more years.When do we predict that this movement will for the most part cease to get any amount of support from the US government?
If by "real" you mean completely made up and fallacious with unsound assumtions and faulty reasoning you would be onto something.
In any event, #WINNING
View attachment 7725258
The movement is already faltering in the shithole troonland that is the UK? troons seriously burned through whatever patience people had left for them very quickly.
Propaganda does play a role in shaping public opinion, but what even has Rowling done? She's funded some legal cases that were already going to happen and she's made some tweets. As worthy as those things are, I don't see how those things by themselves are going to make large swathes of otherwise friendly or neutral citizens suddenly start hating trannies. If a tranny found a magic lamp and wished that JK Rowling had never donated a dime to any feminist causes public opinion would have remained the same, some women would have been left high and dry and that's about it.
She's not canvassing or buying adverts or inserting any of her own agenda into the massive media franchise she owns.