Tommy invades keffals thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Calm down. I hate to break it to you, but most people are disgusted by pedos. You know why? Because sexually abusing a child is about the worst thing you can do. It’s practically hard-wired into humans never to harm a child. When someone does, the instinct of any decent adult is to become outraged. Do you understand?

You say “a random guy,” but that man must have been a disgusting pedo to even entertain the notion of sex with a 12-year-old. Given that she became a homeless junkie, it seems that being sexually active at such a young age did not result in a well-adjusted young woman. Do you understand?
He doesn't understand that because he wants an excuse to keep doing it.
 
the yellow handled tool in my hands is a maul, you irrational insulting infantile imbecile. if you see an all yellow tool laying in there, that's a 42" pry bar.

You're an amazingly obsessed idiot. Your righteous indignation is more fucking disturbed than dave's delusional raving and your own conjecture is disturbing. methinks thou protesteth about pedophilia just a mite too much there, creep. the uncle raped her repeatedly and she went and picked up a random guy. she and her old man have been in recovery for years, some of which would definitely be of benefit to your mentally ill self.
Lmao. You confessed to sexually abusing a minor, and now it's "protesting too much" when people remind you about it.
 
He doesn't understand that because he wants an excuse to keep doing it.
What you don't understand is that nobody likes to be falsely accused of things like you just falsely accused me of. you are insane vigilantes , most likely sex offenders of some sort your own selves. You're also cowards afraid to face me in a court of law where your proof of my alleged pederasty will be laughed out of the courtroom , resulting in a huge judgement against LOLCOW for the conspiracy to defame me. I can prove that what I did was not rape and you can't prove that it was. To call it pedophilia or even hebephilia is simply absurd. You have no victim affidavit or police report. I have numerous credible people to vouch for me and it wouldn't take much for me to get a statement from Sabrina that will corroborate what I say.

You have a real problem with the claim that i bullied a mentally ill woman to death. Where is the proof that i had any contact with her beyond mentioning her in a couple of videos made over a year before her death.


The dog fucking claims will look especially stupid in an actual courtroom instead of this game room, you fucking ridiculous retarded recidivist reprobates.
 
What you don't understand is that nobody likes to be falsely accused of things like you just falsely accused me of. you are insane vigilantes , most likely sex offenders of some sort your own selves. You're also cowards afraid to face me in a court of law where your proof of my alleged pederasty will be laughed out of the courtroom , resulting in a huge judgement against LOLCOW for the conspiracy to defame me. I can prove that what I did was not rape and you can't prove that it was. To call it pedophilia or even hebephilia is simply absurd. You have no victim affidavit or police report. I have numerous credible people to vouch for me and it wouldn't take much for me to get a statement from Sabrina that will corroborate what I say.

You have a real problem with the claim that i bullied a mentally ill woman to death. Where is the proof that i had any contact with her beyond mentioning her in a couple of videos made over a year before her death.


The dog fucking claims will look especially stupid in an actual courtroom instead of this game room, you fucking ridiculous retarded recidivist reprobates.
No likes a liar when there's evidence of them admitting to crimes.

Put up or shut up Thomas. We're all waiting for these supposed lawsuits. It's been five years for some of us.
 
What you don't understand is that nobody likes to be falsely accused of things like you just falsely accused me of.
I’d imagine they don’t, but everything we accuse you of is substantially true according to, and this is the important part, your own words. If you can’t go online without admitting to horrendous shit, that’s your problem, not ours.
you are insane vigilantes , most likely sex offenders of some sort your own selves.
Prove it, fat boy.
You're also cowards afraid to face me in a court of law where your proof of my alleged pederasty will be laughed out of the courtroom , resulting in a huge judgement against LOLCOW for the conspiracy to defame me.
We have repeatedly challenged you to take legal action and you either pretend not to have seen it or backpedal and say, “uhhhhh I’m not ashually taking legal ashion againsh anyone.” Ball’s in your court, so to speak.
I can prove that what I did was not rape and you can't prove that it was.
She was below the age of consent, so it was ipso facto rape. At the very least, sexual assault.
To call it pedophilia or even hebephilia is simply absurd.
Nevertheless, that’s what it is in law. You do not dispute being sexually attracted to her, that she was a minor, that you knew she was a minor or that it was illegal in the territory where it happened. The law doesn’t care what you think it should be.
You have no victim affidavit or police report. I have numerous credible people to vouch for me and it wouldn't take much for me to get a statement from Sabrina that will corroborate what I say.
So… what you’re saying is… we have no victim affidavit to confirm that you committed the illegal act of sexual contact with someone below the age of consent… so you want to get the individual in question to produce a legal statement saying that you did, in fact, have sexual contact with her when she was below the age of consent.

You really aren’t very smart, are you?
The dog fucking claims will look especially stupid in an actual courtroom instead of this game room, you fucking ridiculous retarded recidivist reprobates.
No they won’t. You’ve admitted to sexually assaulting at least one dog multiple times in front of multiple witnesses. You’ve also admitted to becoming sexually excited in the presence of a female dog, which is extremely abnormal and perverted. There is nothing ridiculous on these bases in calling you a “dogfucker.” Especially compared to some of the insults you use against people here.

This is, of course, assuming that you’re telling the truth about never having had penetrative sex with the dog. There are several curious aspects of your accounts that lead me to believe that you’re not telling the whole truth. Happy to detail them if you want.
 
the yellow handled tool in my hands is a maul, you irrational insulting infantile imbecile. if you see an all yellow tool laying in there, that's a 42" pry bar.

You're an amazingly obsessed idiot. Your righteous indignation is more fucking disturbed than dave's delusional raving and your own conjecture is disturbing. methinks thou protesteth about pedophilia just a mite too much there, creep. the uncle raped her repeatedly and she went and picked up a random guy. she and her old man have been in recovery for years, some of which would definitely be of benefit to your mentally ill self.
Nice whataboutism to justify your pedophilic ways Thomas. Doesn't change the fact that you are a pedophile

What you don't understand is that nobody likes to be falsely accused of things like you just falsely accused me of.
I will let you know when we falsely accuse you of something. So far, nobody has done that

most likely sex offenders of some sort your own selves. You're also cowards
Tom you like to use the word projection without knowing what it means. Here is a good example of projection. You are projecting yourself onto us. You are a coward and a sex offender but you hate that about yourself so you are projecting it onto people you hate

You're also cowards afraid to face me in a court of law where your proof of my alleged pederasty will be laughed out of the courtroom , resulting in a huge judgement against LOLCOW for the conspiracy to defame me. I can prove that what I did was not rape and you can't prove that it was. To call it pedophilia or even hebephilia is simply absurd. You have no victim affidavit or police report. I have numerous credible people to vouch for me and it wouldn't take much for me to get a statement from Sabrina that will corroborate what I say.
Here you go your honor, a confession straight from Tom himself
Ooops, now we see why you always threaten a lawsuit without actually filing one. Because your conartists friends saying how swell of a guy you are doesn't compare to your confessions and bragging nature of molesting Sabrina

You have a real problem with the claim that i bullied a mentally ill woman to death. Where is the proof that i had any contact with her beyond mentioning her in a couple of videos made over a year before her death.
Oooooh I would love to have her daughter come up on the stand with all of her evidence of you creating fake accounts and the harassment evidence of you doing that. Who is the judge going to believe? The daughter with receipts and a video from the deceased mother or a bald, toothless, child molesting, dog fucking, disgusting hippy who thinks he is a woman?

The dog fucking claims will look especially stupid in an actual courtroom instead of this game room, you fucking ridiculous retarded recidivist reprobates.
I know you don't remember anything past 2 days but you have been on the internet for over 10 years talking about fucking a dog. That all gets brought up in court and will be put on the public record. Then all you can do is seethe about being a dog fucker. Basically what you are doing now but we will laugh even harder at you
 
Here you go your honor, a confession straight from Tom himself
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2_ztFAF_HYoOoops, now we see why you always threaten a lawsuit without actually filing one. Because your conartists friends saying how swell of a guy you are doesn't compare to your confessions and bragging nature of molesting Sabrina


Oooooh I would love to have her daughter come up on the stand with all of her evidence of you creating fake accounts and the harassment evidence of you doing that. Who is the judge going to believe? The daughter with receipts and a video from the deceased mother or a bald, toothless, child molesting, dog fucking, disgusting hippy who thinks he is a woman?


I know you don't remember anything past 2 days but you have been on the internet for over 10 years talking about fucking a dog. That all gets brought up in court and will be put on the public record. Then all you can do is seethe about being a dog fucker. Basically what you are doing now but we will laugh even harder at you
This is going to sound weird, but this reminds me of Oscar Wilde. It was pretty well known that he was gay, but on the whole, it wasn’t seen as worth the effort to investigate. Had he not sued the Marquess of Queensbury out of pride and arrogance, he’d likely have got away with it forever. But he did, and so in court it was proven that he had, in fact, committed these crimes. Because it was so effectively proven that he had done it, the judge had no choice but to have him imprisoned.

That’s exactly what Tom is proposing. To discuss his illegal and perverted actions in great detail in a courtroom setting because he’s mad at us.
 
the yellow handled tool in my hands is a maul, you irrational insulting infantile imbecile. if you see an all yellow tool laying in there, that's a 42" pry bar.
You know you have further demonstrated your lack of knowledge and competence.

A pry bar is more or less a crow bar, and anyone who used them regularly would understand that people can use the term interchangeably.

Jemmie, which is a slang term for that tool, well it refers to pretty much any tool used for levering.
It can be used to refer to the action of forcibly levering something.

Saying “I will Jemmy that window open” is an example.

I know there are some specific differences between a crow and a pry bar, but literally no one other than pedants or idiots would care.

This leads me to the conclusion that you just put on a hard hat and held the maul to try and look like you can graft.

Oh and you do realize that you have basically said that if a child is raped, it’s then ok to fuck them if they ask?
 
This is going to sound weird, but this reminds me of Oscar Wilde. It was pretty well known that he was gay, but on the whole, it wasn’t seen as worth the effort to investigate. Had he not sued the Marquess of Queensbury out of pride and arrogance, he’d likely have got away with it forever. But he did, and so in court it was proven that he had, in fact, committed these crimes. Because it was so effectively proven that he had done it, the judge had no choice but to have him imprisoned.

That’s exactly what Tom is proposing. To discuss his illegal and perverted actions in great detail in a courtroom setting because he’s mad at us.
See I can't tell if Tom is smart enough to realize that and that is why he isn't suing us or if he is a retarded cowardly faggot and that's why he won't sue us. Its really 50/50
 
See I can't tell if Tom is smart enough to realize that and that is why he isn't suing us or if he is a retarded cowardly faggot and that's why he won't sue us. Its really 50/50
I think it is more that he tries to sue, but lawyers stop answering his calls when they realize the case is stupid and being paid in gravel is not acceptable remuneration.
 
I think it is more that he tries to sue, but lawyers stop answering his calls when they realize the case is stupid and being paid in gravel is not acceptable remuneration.
No we would have seen him calling a lawyer, complaining about not being taken seriously, then his creepy grin to the camera trying to threaten us some more
Agreed, it's both.
Both would be an interesting choice. Considering he is a schizo retard, he could be changing his reasoning every day
 
No we would have seen him calling a lawyer, complaining about not being taken seriously, then his creepy grin to the camera trying to threaten us some more

Both would be an interesting choice. Considering he is a schizo retard, he could be changing his reasoning every day
How likely is it, if he tries to contact this Sabrina, that he would make a video gloating that he got signed papers from her saying he did not rape her, which actually turn out to be a restraining order telling him not to contact her or her family again?
 
How likely is it, if he tries to contact this Sabrina, that he would make a video gloating that he got signed papers from her saying he did not rape her, which actually turn out to be a restraining order telling him not to contact her or her family again?
Tom wouldn't be able to read them for at least 6 months due to his inability to read
 
Tom wouldn't be able to read them for at least 6 months due to his inability to read
This is what I mean.

I seriously think that if he received any legal looking papers he would assume that they were in his favor.

I am quite aware he is a delusional dog fucking, child grooming, child raping, society outcast.

I would say outlaw, but firstly “outlaw” has a bit of a romantic sense attached to it.
Secondly, one cannot be an outlaw, if they choose to not obey laws, yet threaten people with the law when things don’t go their way.

He thinks he is above the law, but he really is not.
The main reason why he has not been thrown in jail is that the authorities probably think it would not be worth the time and effort to keep him locked up.

I am sure they are just allowing him to either annoy his peers enough that they kill him, or just die of semi natural causes such as contracting botulism from spoiled dumpster meat or coming off worse in a fight with a rat over scraps.
 
This is what I mean.

I seriously think that if he received any legal looking papers he would assume that they were in his favor.

I am quite aware he is a delusional dog fucking, child grooming, child raping, society outcast.

I would say outlaw, but firstly “outlaw” has a bit of a romantic sense attached to it.
Secondly, one cannot be an outlaw, if they choose to not obey laws, yet threaten people with the law when things don’t go their way.

He thinks he is above the law, but he really is not.
The main reason why he has not been thrown in jail is that the authorities probably think it would not be worth the time and effort to keep him locked up.

I am sure they are just allowing him to either annoy his peers enough that they kill him, or just die of semi natural causes such as contracting botulism from spoiled dumpster meat or coming off worse in a fight with a rat over scraps.
Tom is too pathetic to lock up in jail. Its more of a punishment to watch him be homeless, eat out of trash cans, and struggle to find social interaction than to prosecute him for his obvious crimes of child molestation.

In jail he would
Eat better
Have a place to sleep at night
Have social interactions he would enjoy (pretty sure a big black dude raping Tom would be something he enjoyed, make him feel like a woman)
And he wouldn't be scammed out of money with fake rocks


I see it as, letting him try to make it in the real world is more of a punishment. I just wish they would cut off his welfare so he would really be in trouble
 
Tom is too pathetic to lock up in jail. Its more of a punishment to watch him be homeless, eat out of trash cans, and struggle to find social interaction than to prosecute him for his obvious crimes of child molestation.

In jail he would
Eat better
Have a place to sleep at night
Have social interactions he would enjoy (pretty sure a big black dude raping Tom would be something he enjoyed, make him feel like a woman)
And he wouldn't be scammed out of money with fake rocks


I see it as, letting him try to make it in the real world is more of a punishment. I just wish they would cut off his welfare so he would really be in trouble
What about this evidence of him apparently doing physical work?

If say a welfare office employee were to see that, would that be grounds to check he is not earning over an allotted amount?

His claims of earning substantial cash for his rocks should also be checked.
 
What about this evidence of him apparently doing physical work?

If say a welfare office employee were to see that, would that be grounds to check he is not earning over an allotted amount?

His claims of earning substantial cash for his rocks should also be checked.
He didn't actually do anything. That house got burned twice this year and Tommy took a picture with an axe in his hand after probably setting it on fire again
 
He didn't actually do anything. That house got burned twice this year and Tommy took a picture with an axe in his hand after probably setting it on fire again
Sure, but maybe the welfare office should have a look.

Make tommie panic when he has to explain his recent activities.
 
Sure, but maybe the welfare office should have a look.

Make tommie panic when he has to explain his recent activities.
The best way would be to have the welfare office look into his fake business where he claims to have made tons of money over the past 40 years. Then Thomas will either have to admit he has been a giant failure for 40 years or he will get busted for welfare fraud and thrown in jail for being a tax cheat
 
Back
Top Bottom