🐮 Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
N9OGL said:
There is also:

Riley v. California (2014) - Although focused on cell phones, the Supreme Court emphasized the need for particularity in digital searches. "Modern cell phones... hold for many Americans the privacies of life... they are based on technology nearly inconceivable just a few decades ago."

United States v. Payton (2007) - The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated a warrant because it was overly broad and did not specify the types of electronic data to be seized. This case specifically addressed the need for particularity in computer search warrants. "The warrant lacked the necessary particularity and authorized a general, exploratory rummaging in the digital data."

United States v. Tamura (1982) - The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals emphasized the need for narrow and specific search warrants, particularly when dealing with large volumes of documents. This case is often cited in discussions about the overbreadth of search warrants and the need for particularity. "If the government is to seize records, it must describe them with as much precision as the circumstances allow, and it must take care to minimize intrusions on legitimate privacy interests."

Orin S. Kerr, "Searches and Seizures in a Digital World," Harvard Law Review, 2005 - This article discusses the challenges and legal principles surrounding searches and seizures of digital data. Provides a comprehensive analysis of the particularity requirement in the context of digital searches. "The particularity requirement is designed to prevent general, exploratory rummaging in a person’s belongings, and is especially pertinent in the digital age."
Click to expand...
Todd. You’re not going to successfully appeal or take this up the circuit. You’re going to prison. You’re not a legal expert, you’re a felonious pedophile
 
mydadtucksmeinmysleep said:
Todd. You’re not going to successfully appeal or take this up the circuit. You’re going to prison. You’re not a legal expert, you’re a felonious pedophile
Click to expand...
I'm hoping he dies within the first month if there is a god, but since there isn't he should live for at least five years before they find him in some back room in the prison with multiple stab wounds.
 
Kill yourself Toad.

Most any other forum would have banned you for spamming and flooding the same bullshit you have said 100 times over but unlike you, KiwiFarms is very tolerant of protecting free speech as I did when I served in the military. However, child pornographers and molesters like yourself should have no rights.

There’s a difference between having an appeal thrown out and successfully appealing Todd.
Click to expand...

He's been saying the "I'm going to sue or I'm going to the appeals court" for 25 years now, never once having filed a thing. He's a retard who makes himself feel better by sayings things he'll never do.

Speaking of which, your "DC lawyers" should have your dismissal written by now since court is next week for you, care to post it?
 
Dirty Harry said:
Kill yourself Toad.

Most any other forum would have banned you for spamming and flooding the same bullshit you have said 100 times over but unlike you, KiwiFarms is very tolerant of protecting free speech as I did when I served in the military. However, child pornographers and molesters like yourself should have no rights.
Click to expand...
It's okay, after this year no one will ever hear from him again
 
Dirty Harry said:
Kill yourself Toad.

Most any other forum would have banned you for spamming and flooding the same bullshit you have said 100 times over but unlike you, KiwiFarms is very tolerant of protecting free speech as I did when I served in the military. However, child pornographers and molesters like yourself should have no rights.
Click to expand...
He's too stupid to understand that in a case like his they'd be going through all file types that can have images and all types of video files. Unlike with a fraud case in which they'll go through all your emails, credit cards, and even your spreadsheets. However if they find contraband images during that search they can get a warrant to go through the computers for that now.
 
Anonymus Fluhre said:
He's too stupid to understand that in a case like his they'd be going through all file types that can have images and all types of video files. Unlike with a fraud case in which they'll go through all your emails, credit cards, and even your spreadsheets. However if they find contraband images during that search they can get a warrant to go through the computers for that now.
Click to expand...
No they can't I suggest you read some court cases
 
N9OGL said:
No they can't I suggest you read some court cases
Click to expand...
I suggest you prepare thyself:
tenor04.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let me clarify it, they can search everything, to some degree but they can't seize everything. searching and seizing is two different things. In the first warrant they seized everything.
 
Why are you you nervous??? You get like this when a court hearing is coming up.

Why don't you just fire your public defender and tell the judge these things yourself instead of a lolcow forum??? I'm sure he'll listen to you since you are such an "expert" on the law.

But now that you are back, I'll ask you the question you dodged last time. Going back to #1389, Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature? Word for word please.
 
DUMBASS MOTHERFUCKER!!! THE FORM IS A PREFORM, THAT ALL THE OFFICER HAS TO DO IS FILL OUT.

BTW YOU FUCKING COCKSUCKING FAGGOT WHY DON'T TELL YOUR FUCKING LITTLE HOMOS ON HERE WHY I DON'T LET PEOPLE POST ON MY SITE...TELL THEM WHY YOU ARE POSTING A PICTURE OF A NAKED GUY ON MY SITE...YOU FUCKING FAGGOT...I NOT A FUCKING QUEER LIKE YOU FUCKING FAGGOT...EAT SHIT AND FUCKING DIE.
 
N9OGL said:
Let me clarify it, they can search everything, to some degree but they can't seize everything. searching and seizing is two different things. In the first warrant they seized everything.
Click to expand...

They didn't seize "everything". Did they seize your sex dolls? Your 1,000s of paper writings you claim to have??? They were very specific in what they were seizing. Then once the child porn was found, they got a second warrant to continue.

To search for files, of course they need to seize your computers to examine them properly in a forensics lab. What do you think, they are supposed to spend weeks at your house doing this while protecting the evidence????

Don't worry mother fucker, once the governor signs that virtual child porn law, they will be coming with another search warrant to once against seize all your (and your parents) electronic devices as you have admitted to committing felonies by producing virtual porn.

N9OGL said:
DUMBASS MOTHERFUCKER!!! THE FORM IS A PREFORM, THAT ALL THE OFFICER HAS TO DO IS FILL OUT.

BTW YOU FUCKING COCKSUCKING FAGGOT WHY DON'T TELL YOUR FUCKING LITTLE HOMOS ON HERE WHY I DON'T LET PEOPLE POST ON MY SITE...TELL THEM WHY YOU ARE POSTING A PICTURE OF A NAKED GUY ON MY SITE...YOU FUCKING FAGGOT...I NOT A FUCKING QUEER LIKE YOU FUCKING FAGGOT...EAT SHIT AND FUCKING DIE.
Click to expand...

That's not what it says above the signature on that form I showed. Now please answer the question. Going back to #1389, Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature? Word for word please.
 
Todd has never read up on digital forensics, not that he'd be able to understand it.
Mikoyan said:
The closest known was a pre-Farms furrycow named Starblade who got stabbed by another skitzo in an institutional (mental halfway house kind of deal) environment.
Click to expand...
That just sounds like the furry was hunting.
 
Dirty Harry said:
They didn't seize "everything". Did they seize your sex dolls? Your 1,000s of paper writings you claim to have??? They were very specific in what they were seizing. Then once the child porn was found, they got a second warrant to continue.

To search for files, of course they need to seize your computers to examine them properly in a forensics lab. What do you think, they are supposed to spend weeks at your house doing this while protecting the evidence????

Don't worry mother fucker, once the governor signs that virtual child porn law, they will be coming with another search warrant to once against seize all your (and your parents) electronic devices as you have admitted to committing felonies by producing virtual porn.
Click to expand...
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST...THEY SEIZED EVERYTHING ON THE COMPUTER FUCKING MORON!!!

TO BE SEIZED:
Any and all computers, as defined in 720 ILCS 5/16D-2; any and all magnetic or optical media, including but not limited to hard disk drives, floppy disks, compact discs, DVDs, USB devices, and any and all passwords or other computer security devices, and any and all information and data stored in the form of magnetic or electronic coding on computer media or on media capable of being read by a computer or with the aid of computer equipment, any and all computer software, any and all evidence, data or information pertaining to the possession including but not limited to: any and all evidence of dominion and control over the computer, specifically, but not limited to, a computer possessing MAC address "EC:4F:82:29:B4:03" or IP address "72.9.123.215"; peer to peer file trading software; any and all information pertaining to dates and times of access to the computer; any and all information pertaining to internet searches pertaining to posts regarding threats of violence directed towards schools or public officials; records and other items which evidence ownership or use of computer equipment found in the above residence; including but not limited to sales receipts, bills for internet access and handwritten notes, records evidencing occupancy or ownership of the premises described above including but not limited to utility and telephone bills, mail envelopes or address correspondence. This search warrant shall include authority to analyze and search any magnetic or optical media seized for relevant evidence as outlined in this search warrant, and the property described herein, when found, shall be inventoried and a return of all instruments, articles or things seized shall be made without unnecessary delay.

THEY CANNOT SEIZE EVERYTHING ON A FUCKING COMPUTER...THEY COURT HAS SAID SO!! FUCKING MORON
 
Anonymus Fluhre said:
That just sounds like the furry was hunting.
Click to expand...
OT but funny: Starblade was the fella who actually originated the phrase "Fuck you I'm a dragon", oft referenced on the old Internet. He genuinely believed he was a dragon, 100%.

Back then I was attached to the furry community more and I was around the area Starbles was living in, and he was considered an insane pest. One of the incidents that really started driving me away from Furries was that I said that clearly, the knife that had been used had to be obtained and revered as a dragonslaying relic, it was obviously magical. Boy did people not like that.

N9OGL said:
MAC address "EC:4F:82:29:B4:03" or IP address "72.9.123.215"
Click to expand...
Oh man. You are very bad at opsec and now you will pay.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom