🐮 Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
N9OGL said:
Still waiting to know how my warrant isn't a general warrant
Click to expand...

Why don't you go ask the judge why it wasn't? It's been 21 months now and counting and neither you or your "team of experts" have brought this up yet in court. If it is as simple as you say it is, this would have been done 20 months ago.

What are you afraid of???? Chicken Shit.
 
Dirty Harry said:
Why don't you go ask the judge why it wasn't? It's been 21 months now and counting and neither you or your "team of experts" have brought this up yet in court. If it is as simple as you say it is, this would have been done 20 months ago.

What are you afraid of???? Chicken Shit.
Click to expand...
They’re railroading Toad, he won’t do shit about it.
 
why would they, the warrant was a general warrant, plain and simple. I am going to win, and I am going to sue them.
 
N9OGL said:
why would they, the warrant was a general warrant, plain and simple. I am going to win, and I am going to sue them.
Click to expand...

Well, if it is so PLAIN AND SIMPLE, what are you waiting for??? Go tell the judge so he can see for himself how PLAIN AND SIMPLE it is. Toad also forgets about the 2nd federal warrant... Remember Toad, you are television to anyone here, we can click the X and turn you off like a TV show, meanwhile the case over you is 24/7 and it just doesn't go away by clicking the X on your browser.

And speaking of the first warrant....... again, I ask the question you refuse to answer

Going back to #1389, Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature? Word for word please.
 
N9OGL said:
why would they, the warrant was a general warrant, plain and simple. I am going to win, and I am going to sue them.
Click to expand...
Could you explain how it was general warrant? It specified they were looking for certain type of incriminating shit on your computer. Explain it to me like I'm slightly retarded kid.
 
Dirty Harry said:
Well, if it is so PLAIN AND SIMPLE, what are you waiting for??? Go tell the judge so he can see for himself how PLAIN AND SIMPLE it is. Toad also forgets about the 2nd federal warrant... Remember Toad, you are television to anyone here, we can click the X and turn you off like a TV show, meanwhile the case over you is 24/7 and it just doesn't go away by clicking the X on your browser.

And speaking of the first warrant....... again, I ask the question you refuse to answer

Going back to #1389, Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature? Word for word please.
Click to expand...
The second warrant is invalid because relied on the first warrant which was a general warrant, so it is invalid. Finally, the officer was the one who wrote the warrant, well he used a template and didn't add to it. judges don't read warrant, they just sign them, they nothing more than templates that the officer fills out and get the judge to sign it.
 
N9OGL said:
judges don't read warrant, they just sign them, they nothing more than templates that the officer fills out and get the judge to sign it.
Click to expand...

You are schizophrenic and making assumptions...... So back to the question again for the nth time....

Going back to #1389, Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature? Word for word please.
 
obliviousbeard said:
Could you explain how it was general warrant? It specified they were looking for certain type of incriminating shit on your computer. Explain it to me like I'm slightly retarded kid.
Click to expand...
it is a general warrant because it doesn't particulars. The warrant states:

TO BE SEIZED:
Any and all computers, as defined in 720 ILCS 5/16D-2; any and all magnetic or optical media, including but not limited to hard disk drives, floppy disks, compact discs, DVDs, USB devices, and any and all passwords or other computer security devices, and any and all information and data stored in the form of magnetic or electronic coding on computer media or on media capable of being read by a computer or with the aid of computer equipment, any and all computer software, any and all evidence, data or information pertaining to the possession including but not limited to: any and all evidence of dominion and control over the computer, specifically, but not limited to, a computer possessing MAC address "EC:4F:82:29:B4:03" or IP address "72.9.123.215"; peer to peer file trading software; any and all information pertaining to dates and times of access to the computer; any and all information pertaining to internet searches pertaining to posts regarding threats of violence directed towards schools or public officials; records and other items which evidence ownership or use of computer equipment found in the above residence; including but not limited to sales receipts, bills for internet access and handwritten notes, records evidencing occupancy or ownership of the premises described above including but not limited to utility and telephone bills, mail envelopes or address correspondence. This search warrant shall include authority to analyze and search any magnetic or optical media seized for relevant evidence as outlined in this search warrant, and the property described herein, when found, shall be inventoried and a return of all instruments, articles or things seized shall be made without unnecessary delay.

That is too broad in scope and seizes more stuff that has nothing to do with the crime which was disorderly conduct and terrorism.

Dirty Harry said:
You are schizophrenic and making assumptions...... So back to the question again for the nth time....

Going back to #1389, Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature? Word for word please.
Click to expand...
IT''S FUCKING TEMPLATE YOU FUCKING MORON...HE DIDN'T WRITE IT

profoundlyunfunnyshitpost said:
Sue on what grounds?
Click to expand...
General warrant, incarcerated for 4 months, damages to reputation and economic injury, emotion distress.
 
profoundlyunfunnyshitpost said:
Hey retard, do you think people have the time to format and type up a document from scratch? I guess I don’t need to pay my taxes since my 1040 was templated.
Click to expand...
Dirty harry think so...he thinks the judge wrote it.

The Fourth Amendment prohibits general search warrants and requires that a warrant describe, with particularity, the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. U.S. Const. amend. IV. The purpose of the particularity requirement is to “protect persons against the government's indiscriminate rummaging through their property” and to “[prevent] the searching for and seizure of items that there is no probable cause to believe are either contraband or evidence of a crime”

United States v. Winn, 79 F. Supp. 3d 904, 918 (S.D. Ill. 2015)
 
N9OGL said:
The first warrant was issued in 2018 (which is the one the state is using in this case) the second one was issued two years later and it is a federal warrant, and part of it's probable cause is the 2018 warrant.
Click to expand...
At this point I’m certain you’re not even sure what warrant they’re using for submitting evidence. You’re so detached from the standing of this case because your PD doesn’t want you sperging at the judge in contempt.
 
N9OGL said:
Dirty harry think so...he thinks the judge wrote it.
Click to expand...

Again, for the nth plus 1 time

Going back to #1389, Tell us, what did the judge write in the sentence before his signature? Word for word please.

At this point I’m certain you’re not even sure what warrant they’re using for submitting evidence. You’re so detached from the standing of this case because your PD doesn’t want you sperging at the judge in contempt.
Click to expand...

That's one of the reasons why she doesn't communicate or return his emails until hours before the next hearing.

Toad is too chicken shit to fire his public defender and tell the judge how PLAIN AND SIMPLE it is to dismiss the case.
 
profoundlyunfunnyshitpost said:
At this point I’m certain you’re not even sure what warrant they’re using for submitting evidence. You’re so detached from the standing of this case because your PD doesn’t want you sperging at the judge in contempt.
Click to expand...
They are 2018 warrant...which was a general warrant
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom