Crime Tiny Knife Wielding Tranny Shot By Cops

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
In the UK, this guy would likely have been tasered, and it would be hilarious.

I'm not going to fault these coppers for deading this fucker though, the silly twat was literally asking for it.

Only after 30 minutes of our guys running around their car like something out of a benny hill skit.
 
The cop did the right thing, in my opinion. The guy was walking towards her, knife in hand, telling her to shoot him, if he really wanted to end his life, then she technically did him a favor. Either way, the officer's life was obviously in danger, so blowing his ass away was clearly justified, he was warned several times to drop the fucking knife before she pulled the trigger, plain and simple.
 
Even though they were armed and was instigating violence with the officer, it's a shame someone had to die. That said, I don't think the officer is in the wrong- she did try to talk them down, but they were adamant.

As other people have already pointed out, this kid was obviously mentally unstable. A healthy person doesn't run at a cop with a weapon literally asking to be killed solely to make a point. The fact that this will inevitably be compared to cases where the victim was actually unarmed simply because the kid was a transtrender is infuriating. If they were unarmed, the story would be different, but apparently they had a knife and a gun.

Our media has taught people that dying while breaking the law will net them posthumous attention and possibly even martyrdom. The Columbine shooters, for example, mused about how Quentin Tarantino would make a movie based on them. Obviously Tarantino didn't, but Gus Van Sant and Michael Moore did. Way to give the murderers what they wanted, guys. Point is, all giving people this much attention for breaking the law does is encourage others to do the same.

I feel bad for the cop in this case. Female officers in particular are less likely to recover psycologically from this sort of thing.
 
Last edited:
In the UK, this guy would likely have been tasered, and it would be hilarious.

I'm not going to fault these coppers for deading this fucker though, the silly twat was literally asking for it.

Only assuming the UK officers on the scene were the ones that don't carry firearms.

In a environment like this where there's no real barrier between the armed perp and the officer at only 10-15 feet distance you absolutely would not use a taser if you had the option of a firearm, that is if they follow their training correctly. Using a taser in the manner the female officer used her weapon in this situation would have likely got her injured at least.
 
Those screams are horrible. I feel bad for the cops forced to make the decision to shoot. I know it's been said a thousand times in this thread, but how fucking selfish do you have to be? The cops, and everyone on that block are going to be hearing those screams for the rest of their lives. Don't burden other people with your illness if you honestly feel killing yourself is something you need to do.
 
That's what happens when you glorify mental illness. Therapy could have literally saved this troon's life but he didn't receive any because his family and friends were either too woke or too timid to suggest that anything about his behavior wasn't normal. Now the one receiving therapy will be the cop who was forced to shoot him.
 
I was hoping this was about Alex Mauer. Sad.

Greta will surely be fear mongering the crap out of this story. Scout's death is just going to be used as another money making ploy... I just feel bad for the cop.
 
Reading the article in question what concerns me the most is not the actions of the troon but rather the responses of their parents

Rather than talking about how they wish this didn't happen and that they mourn for their loss their mother emphasizes that they were "nonconformist" and their dad - which is what really gets me - immediately uses their kid's death as a political tool, disregarding this not as a tragedy but as a case of martyrdom for his favored political cause

The kid obviously wasn't well but these comments alone make me deeply concerned about what kind of household they grew up in
 
The leg is a small target to begin with & if its in motion (i.e. someone charging at you) it will be damn near impossible to get a disabling shot.
If a cop is trained to aim for the leg, he hits the leg. Around here it's really rare for police to aim for the center mass, something like 80% of the shots are aimed at thighs. Even the terrorist in Turku was dropped with a leg shot.

Killing a knife guy also lands a cop in a world of shit: in 2000 officers killed a charging billhook-wielding psycopath (who had escaped from an insane asylum) by shooting him in the legs three times, and one of the cops was found guilty of manslaughter and gross misconduct.
 
Can someone give me a short summary of why police have to shoot to kill, I know its to avoid lawsuits if you paralyze/cripple someone and you have to totally eliminate the threat or whatever

Well, I don't know about 'short'
Let me start with the technical line: police do not "shoot to kill," per se. Police training stresses "shoot to stop." If they did shoot to kill, they would shoot for the head (which some particular specialized units do train to do in situations like hostage-taking). Generally, police are trained to shoot for the chest, which happens to be the largest target on the human body that also has significant blood vessels.

By aiming at the largest target, you make it more likely that someone shooting will hit. Hitting even a torso-sized target with a handgun is no easy task when adrenaline is pumping and someone is shooting back or coming at you with a knife. And a dirty little secret of policing is that not all cops are great shots. In fact, quite a few probably only fire their weapons when they have to for qualifications. Makes some sense- of all the things we ask police to do, shooting people is the thing that takes up the least of their time. Most never have to do it.

I mentioned blood vessels- a drop in blood pressure is one of only a few ways to render someone incapacitated (although it rarely happens immediately). People have gone through and won gunfights after being shot multiple times- one was a woman cop who was shot in the heart with a .357 magnum. She went on to kill the guys who attacked her before she collapsed. That's one reason suspects sometimes get shot a bunch of times- a cop shoots them and, because it's not the movies, pretty much nothing happens. So the cop either figures he missed or decides to keep shooting until the guy falls down, which can take awhile. I could go through a few cases where people have been shot many times, including through the head, and continued to fight.

Other ways to drop someone include a disruption of the central nervous system- i.e. a brain shot or hit on the spine, and bone breakage. If you shoot someone and break their femur, for example, they will probably fall down. So why not do that?

Well, a few reasons. First, if they have a gun, they can still shoot you. But even if they just have a knife, it's pretty damn hard to hit the femur or even the leg of a moving target. Shooting someone in the pelvis is actually a viable option, but going for 'center mass' is just easier to train and rely on. Also, sometimes someone who has been shot in the torso will just decide that they are supposed to lie down due to the psychological effect.

Incidentally, because someone can bleed out extremely quickly from being shot in the leg or shoulder, there is no legal difference in force between shooting someone in the limb or chest.

So the torso it is. And, unfortunately, the drop in blood pressure that causes someone to no longer be a threat also tends to cause irreparable brain injury due to ischemia if advanced medical care is not provided immediately. Which it usually isn't, unless someone is smart enough to be shot in the trauma ward of a metropolitan hospital.
 
Basically, she was threatening to attack the officers with a knife and refused to surrender, thus when she came closer to one of the cops they shot her.

Lol she. This fucker would have chimped because he wanted to be called they.

Not even troon loving PC kiwis can keep up with all the pronoun craziness.
 
Last edited:
Can't say I have an ounce of sympathy for this looney troon.

Common sense says to not charge at cops while wielding a weapon- regardless if it's a knife or gun.

The only recognition this troon deserves is from the Darwin Awards.
 
After watching that video I have zero sympathy. That shooting was 100% justified.

I feel bad for the cops, though. Suicide by cop is a pretty nasty thing to do to another human being. Hopefully the officers involved don't develop PTSD over this.
 
Good that they can defend themselves, but I got one question: why did they not use rubber bullets?

Because you need a fuck off huge shotgun for that?

Also, rubber bullets don't exactly have good stopping power if you're against a smackhead high on dope charging you with a chainsaw or some shit.
 
Doesn't matter if it's a tiny knife or a fucking machete, you don't go waving it about austically while walking towards cops.

It's not about what he had or what he did, it's about what he could have had and what he could have done. The police didn't exactly have chance to do a pat down, therefore they had to expect the worst.

For all they know, scout could have been high on bath salts with a knife and a gun and a bomb strapped to his vest. The only time they knew how much of a threat he was, was when he finally listened to a bullet and laid down.
 
Back
Top Bottom