The Mary Sue

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
No, they just know the REAL history. Like how every great civilization was actually black, and the fact that they did not depict themselves in that way in their art is colonial European racism
 
friedshrimp said:
SJWs know very little of history and have this belief that every country has the same history of the USA regarding race relations (white people on power, slavery, genocide, "Poor POCs"), so when they see another country talk about race issues or make media featuring whites in positive roles, they get REEE.

And when these countries try to follow America's way/white guilt just to not get eaten by SJWs and called racists, we get disasters like the rapefugee nonsense in Europe. Sure, our women may be getting raped more than usual, but hey, at least we aren't racists!

^Ugh, the TVTropes forum is awful. Probably the biggest collection of smug egotistical SJWs who think they're god's gift to man. Don't know what is it but SJWs know how to master patronization and passive-agressivenes very well.
Click to expand...

I think there's actually a perverse trend among some feminists (crossing over into intersectional SJW territory) that either consciously or subconsciously actually either don't mind, or actively want, more women to get raped, because several of them had their conversions into feminism after suffering some form of sexual assault and then "counselling" (by feminists) or womens' studies courses. The more that are assaulted/raped, the more converts to their ideology they gain. This is particularly suspiciously evident in their insistence that women not protect themselves against attack because "they shouldn't HAVE to because this should already be Utopia," which anyone with a brain can see right through as a very unhelpful strategy in dealing with stone cold reality.
 
Last edited:
Koby_Fish said:
I think there's actually a perverse trend among some feminists (crossing over into intersectional SJW territory) that either consciously or subconsciously actually either don't mind, or actively want, more women to get raped, because several of them had their conversions into feminism after suffering some form of sexual assault. The more that are assaulted/raped, the more converts to their ideology they gain. This is particularly suspiciously evident in their insistence that women not protect themselves against attack because "they shouldn't HAVE to because this should already be Utopia," which anyone with a brain can see right through as a very unhelpful strategy in dealing with stone cold reality.
Click to expand...

I've recently started wondering if third wave feminists actually fetishize the status of rape survivor. It seems like many would actually want that "title" because it then gives them some kind of moral authority. Obviously I'm not suggesting most of these women actually want to get raped, just that might be part of why rape has such a liberal definition in those circles.
 
Koby_Fish said:
I think there's actually a perverse trend among some feminists (crossing over into intersectional SJW territory) that either consciously or subconsciously actually either don't mind, or actively want, more women to get raped, because several of them had their conversions into feminism after suffering some form of sexual assault. The more that are assaulted/raped, the more converts to their ideology they gain. This is particularly suspiciously evident in their insistence that women not protect themselves against attack because "they shouldn't HAVE to because this should already be Utopia," which anyone with a brain can see right through as a very unhelpful strategy in dealing with stone cold reality.
Click to expand...

Well if you look at the sexual assaults and rapes in Sweden/Germany, they should have the most Feminists of them all! Until they go so far into Feminism they convert to Islam... which makes perfectly logical sense...........
corbin.jpg
feminists-burka.jpg
 
Koby_Fish said:
I think there's actually a perverse trend among some feminists (crossing over into intersectional SJW territory) that either consciously or subconsciously actually either don't mind, or actively want, more women to get raped, because several of them had their conversions into feminism after suffering some form of sexual assault. The more that are assaulted/raped, the more converts to their ideology they gain. This is particularly suspiciously evident in their insistence that women not protect themselves against attack because "they shouldn't HAVE to because this should already be Utopia," which anyone with a brain can see right through as a very unhelpful strategy in dealing with stone cold reality.
Click to expand...

Where's my horrifying rating. :c
 
Koby_Fish said:
I think there's actually a perverse trend among some feminists (crossing over into intersectional SJW territory) that either consciously or subconsciously actually either don't mind, or actively want, more women to get raped, because several of them had their conversions into feminism after suffering some form of sexual assault and then "counselling" (by feminists) or womens' studies courses. The more that are assaulted/raped, the more converts to their ideology they gain. This is particularly suspiciously evident in their insistence that women not protect themselves against attack because "they shouldn't HAVE to because this should already be Utopia," which anyone with a brain can see right through as a very unhelpful strategy in dealing with stone cold reality.
Click to expand...
The "shouldn't HAVE to" thing irritates the fuck out of me. I shouldn't have to lock my doors. I shouldn't have to take my keys out of my car. But because I don't utterly reject reality I do these things to at least slow down bad people from doing bad things to me. Because there will always be bad people who do bad things sometimes just because they can, and no grander reason than that.
 
neverendingmidi said:
The "shouldn't HAVE to" thing irritates the fuck out of me. I shouldn't have to lock my doors. I shouldn't have to take my keys out of my car. But because I don't utterly reject reality I do these things to at least slow down bad people from doing bad things to me. Because there will always be bad people who do bad things sometimes just because they can, and no grander reason than that.
Click to expand...
and on top of that, no amount of sanctimonious SJW bulljizz is going to stop the bad people, no matter how hard the SJWs wish that were so. Real criminals laugh at SJWs and then pull a Cartman "I do what I want!"
 
Frankly the SJWs' answer to violent attacks and rapes is more derailment than progressive. Things like "you shouldn't protect yourself" or "POC men can't be faulted for being rapists/robbers they're victims of society's prejudice maybe if people weren't so racist/islamophobic they wouldn't be going around raping/killing people".

It's like they refuse to allow non-white people to do something beneficial with their lives, like it's their natural habitat to behave violently. This attitude seems more on par with 19th century ideals.
 
friedshrimp said:
Frankly the SJWs' answer to violent attacks and rapes is more derailment than progressive. Things like "you shouldn't protect yourself" or "POC men can't be faulted for being rapists/robbers they're victims of society's prejudice maybe if people weren't so racist/islamophobic they wouldn't be going around raping/killing people".

It's like they refuse to allow non-white people to do something beneficial with their lives, like it's their natural habitat to behave violently. This attitude seems more on par with 19th century ideals.
Click to expand...
And thus "progressivism" comes full circle into full-on regressive-ism. Many 19th Century "progressives" had exactly this attitude, particularly the ones who were fond of eugenics.
 
Nice projection, Viv.
Vivian Lame said:
Yes, even Kellyanne Conway, with her misguided views of feminism, politics, and how words work.

Even Ivanka Trump, a “walking billboard” for her own clothing & accessories line, who acts as a shieldfor her father, convincing millions of Americans that he cares about women’s health and wellbeing.

Even all the women who voted for Donald Trump.

Even the women who call us snowflakes.
Click to expand...

They're also not wrong when they call it "slack chat".
 
Last edited:
Koby_Fish said:
I think there's actually a perverse trend among some feminists (crossing over into intersectional SJW territory) that either consciously or subconsciously actually either don't mind, or actively want, more women to get raped, because several of them had their conversions into feminism after suffering some form of sexual assault and then "counselling" (by feminists) or womens' studies courses.
Click to expand...
And because men actually aren't all that rapey, they have to redefine every little hurt feefees as "rape".
 
Whenever I used to came up with a new character, I'd take the Mary Sue test to assure my subconscious that my characters were good.
 
Venus said:
Not sure if this article has been brought up yet, but...

https://www.google.ca/amp/www.themarysue.com/diverse-comic-sales-not-readers-fault/amp/

The writer of this article fails to understand that Readers = Consumers. Surprisingly, the majority of readers who used to buy the comics aren't willing to put up with having political narratives shoved down their throats- who knew!
Click to expand...
"But-but, comics were pushing political narratives like equality even back when comic books were just starting!" - Every SJW ever, ignoring the fact that advocating peace, justice, love, and the American Way are NOT the same as condescending, sanctimonious SJW Virtue Signalling.
 
Yeah, people wouldn't be so against SJW ideas if they weren't linked often to lazy passive-aggressive spoiled brats who always talk about wanting to kill every person they meet.
 
Koby_Fish said:
"But-but, comics were pushing political narratives like equality even back when comic books were just starting!" - Every SJW ever, ignoring the fact that advocating peace, justice, love, and the American Way are NOT the same as condescending, sanctimonious SJW Virtue Signalling.
Click to expand...

Even if they did, they did it better as well. Compare EC Comics' classic, "Judgement Day," to any given SJW comic and the difference is readily apparent.
 
friedshrimp said:
Yeah, people wouldn't be so against SJW ideas if they weren't linked often to lazy passive-aggressive spoiled brats who always talk about wanting to kill every person they meet.
Click to expand...

The thing I don't get is: These SJW types all like to scream about "privilege" and oppression but how many of them are comfortably middle to upper middle class? They all seem to conveniently forget that their existence is far less "oppressed" than the homeless guy under the overpass, even if he is a white cishet male.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom