The Linux Thread - The Autist's OS of Choice

[⚞⛇⚟]

Hypothetically, but if Microsoft gets new management and goes "fuck it" and releases a version of Windows so stripped down that you can use it headless or even port KDE and Cinnamon to it (but still using the NT kernel and having full support for window apps) would anyone here try it?

If Fortnite works with it than sure.

 

[Paul Revere Pantry Raider]

No and I was a crazy schizo who ran KDE over Mac OS X 10.2, it took a day and a half to build.

OuroborosX was a hell of a drug.

 

[The Enola Gay]

Hypothetically, but if Microsoft gets new management and goes "fuck it" and releases a version of Windows so stripped down that you can use it headless or even port KDE and Cinnamon to it (but still using the NT kernel and having full support for window apps) would anyone here try it?

No. I have enough problems without having to juggle Microsoft's problems on top of them. Abandon ship.

 

[Akerman]

If this had been viable with KDE 3 in the QT 3 era you would have been able to mix the best spatial/navigational file manager that ever existed right into your Windows XP environment and natively copy files from your local Windows file system to SFTP or WebDAV servers.

Indeed KDE 3.x was great, I tried daily driving the Trinity Desktop, but Konqueror is completely broken on it and the DE itself while usable to some degree is just not maintained enough in other places to be fully daily drivable without headache. It's a damn shame because the form factor of TDE is exactly what I personally want out of a desktop. I don't need anything more than that. Plus I am super nostalgic for KDE 3, it was my first DE I ever used all the way back in elementary school. They ran all the school computers on Kubuntu, and taught us libre software on it like GIMP. I suspect it was some kind of FSF funded free software education initiative though I am not sure.

 

[Dread First]

I suspect it was some kind of FSF funded free software education initiative though I am not sure.

The rule of thumb is that any country with a history of socialist and/or communist rule eventually became amenable to GNU/Linux. Nowadays, we have the EU pivoting to Linux for the sake of data sovereignty. Before then, licensing and hardware costs made Windows and OSX untenable. The FSFLA had tons of success in South America pushing the cause forward, largely due to anti-imperialist rhetoric and the pragmatic arguments surrounding cost/benefit and reducing dependencies on US firms. As an example: Canaima is the state-funded Linux distro used in Venezuelan schools, government offices, and so on. Similar stuff happened in Brazil and Cuba.

 

[SchizoDaemon]

Indeed KDE 3.x was great, I tried daily driving the Trinity Desktop, but Konqueror is completely broken on it and the DE itself while usable to some degree is just not maintained enough in other places to be fully daily drivable without headache. It's a damn shame because the form factor of TDE is exactly what I personally want out of a desktop. I don't need anything more than that. Plus I am super nostalgic for KDE 3, it was my first DE I ever used all the way back in elementary school. They ran all the school computers on Kubuntu, and taught us libre software on it like GIMP. I suspect it was some kind of FSF funded free software education initiative though I am not sure.

It is a similar situation with Gnome 2.X and Cinnamon. I really liked Gnome 2.X but Mate doesn't seem to feel right. Cinnamon has loads of weird oversights e.g. the sound settings can be opened multiple times.

 

[Dread First]

It is a similar situation with Gnome 2.X and Cinnamon. I really liked Gnome 2.X but Mate doesn't seem to feel right. Cinnamon has loads of weird oversights e.g. the sound settings can be opened multiple times.

Linux Mint MATE is the only MATE implementation that's actually GOOD... because it feels EXACTLY the way that Linux Mint 11 and Linux Mint 12 did during the twilight years of GNOME 2.32. As to Cinnamon, it's an incomplete hard fork. Like you still need SOME GNOME apps to properly fill out the user experience. Mint and Fedora have the best Cinnamon implementations.

 

[acid_ra1n]

Bout to force Linux on another unsuspecting "can you remove virus from my old computer" person

 

[SCV]

Linux Mint MATE is the only MATE implementation that's actually GOOD... because it feels EXACTLY the way that Linux Mint 11 and Linux Mint 12 did during the twilight years of GNOME 2.32. As to Cinnamon, it's an incomplete hard fork. Like you still need SOME GNOME apps to properly fill out the user experience. Mint and Fedora have the best Cinnamon implementations.

Is MATE entirely free of GNOME? I ask because I would think most non-insane-trannies would be trying to drop GNOME entirely and I wouldn't want to recommend a relative Mint with a bad DE choice.

 

[Dread First]

Is MATE entirely free of GNOME? I ask because I would think most non-insane-trannies would be trying to drop GNOME entirely and I wouldn't want to recommend a relative Mint with a bad DE choice.

MATE was always a wholly hard fork of GNOME 2.32. Absolutely everything in MATE is 1:1 with GNOME 2.32, with all applications being renamed to avoid conflicts with later GNOME software. Cinnamon started off as a soft fork of GNOME Shell until the Mint team decided to make the fork hard in the mid-to-late 2010s, which is why Cinnamon itself is relatively incomplete compared to MATE

 

[SchizoDaemon]

Linux Mint MATE is the only MATE implementation that's actually GOOD... because it feels EXACTLY the way that Linux Mint 11 and Linux Mint 12 did during the twilight years of GNOME 2.32. As to Cinnamon, it's an incomplete hard fork. Like you still need SOME GNOME apps to properly fill out the user experience. Mint and Fedora have the best Cinnamon implementations.

Yep. I've only used Cinnamon on Arch and Debian and Debian just defaults everything to Gnome apps so you have this weird half Gnome / Half Cinnamon. Arch is much better IMO. I prefer to avoid anything based on Ubuntu.