The Kansas Abortion Shocker

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Earlier this summer, when the Supreme Court ended a 50-year federal right to abortion, Democrats had no choice but to place their faith in voters to rebel against the ruling. Until tonight, however, no one could definitively say whether Roe v. Wade outrage would carry over to the polls.

Tonight in Kansas, Americans got their first hint of that response, and it was a resounding victory for abortion rights. Voters there decisively rejected an amendment that would have allowed the state’s Republican-controlled legislature to ban abortion across the state. With more than three-quarters of precincts reporting, the “No” vote was leading by more than 20 points. The surprising result keeps abortion legal in a GOP stronghold, one of the few states in the region where conservative majorities have not already outlawed the procedure.

Politically, the outcome is sure to reverberate across the country and buoy the Democrats’ bid to capitalize on the overturning of Roe in the midterm battle for Congress this fall. It will lift the party’s hopes that anger over the Supreme Court’s decision will matter more than concerns about inflation and President Joe Biden’s leadership, allowing Democrats to maintain their narrow majorities on Capitol Hill. “This victory tonight confirms that abortion is popular in all states, not just on the coasts,” Elise Higgins, a lifelong Kansan who is the director of reproductive rights at the State Innovation Exchange, a progressive advocacy group, told me.

Tonight marked the first time that voters had a chance to weigh in directly on abortion since the Supreme Court scrapped Roe in its decision in Dobbs v. Mississippi Women’s Health Organization. Both public and private polls had shown the race to be close, and opponents of the anti-abortion amendment were cautiously optimistic in the closing days that they could pull out an upset victory.

Republican lawmakers in Kansas had put a constitutional amendment on the ballot long before the Supreme Court ruling, scheduling the vote to coincide a partisan August primary that they hoped would help the anti-abortion cause. For more than a year, it looked like that decision would pay off. But the June 24 decision in the Dobbscase galvanized abortion-rights supporters, who blanketed Kansas’s most populous counties with television ads that targeted not only Democrats but independent and Republican voters as well.

The amendment would have banned taxpayer funding of abortion and effectively invalidated a 2019 ruling by the Kansas Supreme Court that the state’s constitution protected abortion rights. Approval of the ballot measure would have given Kansas’s GOP lawmakers free reign to follow their counterparts in other conservative states, including Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas, and ban abortion without exceptions. Republicans have a supermajority in the Kansas legislature, meaning they would likely be able to override a veto by the state’s Democratic governor, Laura Kelly.

Drawing on polling data over the past several years, the “Vote No” campaign insisted that despite the state’s Republican leanings, support for abortion rights in Kansas extended nearly as broadly as it does in the nation overall. “The majority of Kansans want abortion to remain safe, legal, and accessible,” Higgins said.

Kansas’s abortion foes didn’t make much effort to dispute that assertion. Rather than campaign outwardly for voters to give them the right to ban abortion, the “Yes” side argued that the ballot initiative—named the “Value Them Both Amendment”—would merely take the decision away from the courts and return it to the public and elected representatives. Canvassers were instructed to make clear to voters that the amendment itself did not outlaw abortion, even though its passage would free the GOP-controlled legislature to do so.

At times, anti-abortion advocates clouded their pitch in the language of their opposition, using words like “choice” and “regulation.” That effort veered into outright misinformation a day before the election, when thousands of voters—including a former Democratic governor of Kansas, Kathleen Sebelius—received a text message warning that women in the state “are losing their choice” on abortion. “Voting YES on the Amendment will give women a choice,” the text said. “Vote YES to protect women’s health.” The sender was unidentified, although the Washington Postreported that the group behind the texts is run by a former arch-conservative Kansas congressman.

Higgins was one of the voters who received the text on Monday. She sent “a strongly-worded reply” to the number, she told me, but got no further response. “I was really furious,” Higgins said. “It was part and parcel of the deceptive tactics that the anti-abortion movement is using in this fight.”

But Higgins also told me she was hopeful, seeing the desperation inherent in the misleading texts as evidence that abortion-rights supporters had already succeeded in overcoming their biggest challenge. They had mobilized voters to turn out in what was expected to be a sleepy summer primary in which many voters would otherwise have had no reason to participate. That initial victory was confirmed the moment the polls began to close tonight, when Kansas’s secretary of state, Scott Schwab, said turnout would likely shatter expectations and rival that of a presidential general election.

The question then became whether a surge in enthusiasm would be enough to carry the abortion-rights side in a state that Donald Trump won by 15 points just two years ago. Within a couple of hours, the answer became clear, and it wasn’t particularly close. Now, Democrats will try to replicate that winning strategy in another long-shot campaign: keeping control of Congress in November.

 
I'm not pro-anything, I'm anti-life and anti-choice: women will be forced to have the baby, and then the baby will be shot

Vote for me, I'm less insane than biden and my son isnt a crackhead
 
Last edited:
Politically, the outcome is sure to reverberate across the country and buoy the Democrats’ bid to capitalize on the overturning of Roe in the midterm battle for Congress this fall.
...that's not how that works.

Approval of the ballot measure would have given Kansas’s GOP lawmakers free reign to follow their counterparts in other conservative states, including Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas, and ban abortion without exceptions.

...every time this bullshit's trotted out, I become upset, and I hope they weren't specifically telling people that abortion was going to be banned without exception.

Or, rather, I hope that if they did, there was more than ample pushback against that idea.
 
So the system worked like it was supposed to.

Actually, that is pretty shocking.

A few weeks ago, it was reported that voting registration increased by 1,000% after Roe v Wade was overturned. That 1,000% increase was between June 17th to June 24th (the day of overturning). Missouri experienced a 600% increase. Overall, voting registration increased due to the Supreme Court decisions.

Basically, it took the overturning of Row v Wade for many liberals, a notoriously unreliable voting demographic, to realize that voting is pretty important. I’m genuinely curious to see how these registrations will influence the 2024 election map though.
 
I'm not pro-anything, I'm anti-life and anti-choice: women should be forced to have the baby, and then the baby will be shot

Vote for me, I'm less insane than biden and my son isnt a crackhead
Do we eat the babies after or burn them?

Edit: on a more serious note I hope they are rejecting it in favor of a more moderate take on abortion medical necessity etc
 
Do we eat the babies after or burn them?

Edit: on a more serious note I hope they are rejecting it in favor of a more moderate take on abortion medical necessity etc
There is no such thing as "moderates" in the abortion debate.

The abortion-industrial complex demands that every woman with child be raped with an egg-beater. Any claim to the contrary is a lie.
 
What’s the over/under on vote fuckery?

Also, with the way the bill was written, there wasn’t really anything to say if you were apathetic about the issues. As I see it:
- Allow state court rulings to stand
- Let the GOP legislators make their own anti-abortion rules
 
It isn't 2002 anymore and Christian fundamentalists don't control the right. Missouri, Arkansas, and maybe Texas can be pants-on-head retarded but the rest of the country, including red states, are going to allow woman like me to brutally and viciously kill every fetus nigger that invades our wombs just like women for millenia have always done and Christcucks will just have to seeth and analy dialate their prayer beads about it. I admit I'm still half convinced that the Supreme Court didn't strike a Devil's bargain with Democrats to repeal Roe so it could turn into the next forever war and distract from everything else, but it's turning out to be a big nothing burger. And it's not because of Soros money or ballot fruad- is because even Kansas knows banning abortion is fucking stupid. Stay mad.
 
A few weeks ago, it was reported that voting registration increased by 1,000% after Roe v Wade was overturned. That 1,000% increase was between June 17th to June 24th (the day of overturning). Missouri experienced a 600% increase. Overall, voting registration increased due to the Supreme Court decisions.

Basically, it took the overturning of Row v Wade for many liberals, a notoriously unreliable voting demographic, to realize that voting is pretty important. I’m genuinely curious to see how these registrations will influence the 2024 election map though.

And shit like that is going to keep happening, because conservatards are good for nothing but being outraged by their enemy`s latest affront before convincing themselves that it’s impossible for their enemies to take the next most logical step, and therefore they themselves don`t have to do anything.

I see a lot of conjecture on the Farms about what the liberals can and cannot do during the next elections. There`s uninformed guesses about money spent, favors called in, getting party faihful organized to do xyz, etc. “There`s no way they can do it again.”

That`s logical human stuff for people with normal human motivations. What these people forget is the power of FANATICISM.

Fanatics will do shit without having to be explicitly told to do so. They will expend their own resources, “take matters into their own hands,” and crawl naked over broken glass to do it. They will do illogical, unreasonable, illegal, and outright dangerous shit to save the world/for their religion/ for Our Democracy RIGHT NOW, consequences be damned.

You think some minor-league libshit election offical in Crow`s Ass, Arkansas needs some “higher-up” to explicity tell them how to stuff ballot boxes and slip them a couple of thousand to do so? Sheeeit. They already know how to do it and are willing to pitch in.

What just happened during the last presidential election was not a fluke or the results of favors called in and money spent. It is the new normal.
 
Oh no a state being given it's rights back voted and got a proper result using the proper channels.


I will now tardrage about how it isn't fair how something happened as it was designed and will now spend three weeks making hypotheticals on law bordering on fanfic because im too retarded to figure out HOW THE LAW FUCKING WORKS. While also ignoring that if said fanfics were to happen, why would OPPOSITION follow procedures designed to fuck them over?
 
Even though I am pro-life, I don't care. It's unfortunate, but it went through the proper avenues rather than judicial activism so whatever. I suspect that most conservatives nowadays don't care and aren't as influenced by religious reasons versus purely economic factors when it comes to being conservative, with the tranny shit also being thrown in because no one likes visible freaks.

Edit: Basic spelling correcting
 
Last edited:
A few weeks ago, it was reported that voting registration increased by 1,000% after Roe v Wade was overturned. That 1,000% increase was between June 17th to June 24th (the day of overturning). Missouri experienced a 600% increase. Overall, voting registration increased due to the Supreme Court decisions.

Basically, it took the overturning of Row v Wade for many liberals, a notoriously unreliable voting demographic, to realize that voting is pretty important. I’m genuinely curious to see how these registrations will influence the 2024 election map though.
Nah that's just ballot harvesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom