The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
make_it_so said:
By that same token, lots of White Nationalists/Supremacists lust after and often wind up with brown and Asian women, so that's not exclusively a jeet thing.
Click to expand...
Don't compare real, time-honored traditions to the unrealistic fantasies of the statistically most undesirable men on the planet.
hear-him-out-v0-nrnqr2n4kh4d1.png
 
NovaFoxfufu said:
Every time I think curryfags can’t get any dumber I learn shit like this.
Click to expand...
Like every animal smarter than a Jeet, Jeets basically worship monkeys too. They run rampant throughout the place:{


Then when the monkeys are being a plague, saaar, they are being catching them in traps, saaar, then releasing them 100 yards up the road saaar, with the redeemed promisings of not being coming back, saaar, yis!

 
More fallout from the jeet jet crash: The deal with Armenia has fallen through. Interestingly, the Tejas has a bunch of Israeli EW components in it.

Armenia pauses Indian Tejas deal after Dubai crash, Israeli suppliers brace for impact​

An advanced version of the Tejas fighter jet, equipped with AESA radar technology and an electronic warfare system manufactured by Elta of Israel Aerospace Industries, is in production.​

Armenia announced that it is suspending negotiations on the purchase of the Indian Tejas fighter jet, following a crash during an air display at the Dubai Airshow on Saturday.

The aircraft's pilot, Wing Commander Namansh Sial, was killed in the crash.

Armenia was conducting talks with the Indian government and aircraft manufacturer HAL regarding the purchase of 12 aircraft for $1.2 billion in what would have been the first export deal of the aircraft. The development of the Tejas jet began in 1982, as part of India's attempt to become both one of the world's largest arms purchasers and exporters.
Click to expand...
https://archive.is/I1pC8
https://www.jpost.com/international/article-875092
 
Last edited:
Irrational Exuberance said:
You mean socialism, the integration of all people and government into one large system which controls what every person does, where they live, and what freedoms they are allowed to have for the purposes of the greater soviet. This is because real Communism is only possible in a fantasy world once everyone has been packed tightly enough in a single box that their "true nature" can emerge and the box miraculously disappears on its own.
Click to expand...
Has anyone noticed that little slither at the South West tip of the mega turd that’s India? Take a look at the indoor toilet per household map, street shitting percentage map - or heck - even a colourised map of written literacy poo-vince by poo-vince (idk the correct terminology for the regions) - what do you notice?

That’s Kerala and it’s an outlier in almost every way. Literacy rates are +95%, street shitting is way down. It has the highest human development index in the country (not a brag really when you consider the rest of it), closest ratio of men to women and significantly the lowest population growth rate. There is a term called the Kerala Phenomenon - referring to the high development of one area in a low economic development country.

This unicorn state is currently ruled by the LDF (Left Democratic Front), led by none other than The Communist Party of India. Some of Kerala’s success is attributed to the fact it was run as a social democratic welfare economy following independence. They also bring in a lot of remittance which inflates their GDP, but they have a welfare system and pensions - which mean there are fewer people living in abject poverty.

It’s not exactly the kind of Communism that would wake Lenin from his perma-slumber, but flags with the hammer and sickle fly on the streets and of course Modi straight up hates it.
 
Now I'm a pretty left leaning person , but I fucking hate Indians with a burning passion. I was training at a strongman/powerlifting gym for a couple of weeks , the owner is a pajeet with a fake western name. I was nothing but cordial and respectful to the guy , I even cleaned the shit covered toilets every time I went there. There was a incident where he approached me in the gym to say I'm benching wrong , I politely tell him I have a coach ,then he tells me my coach is shit and doesn't know what he's talking about ( he has multiple world records ) I tell him well I don't think many women let along people are benching 165kgs for reps ,he ended up saying " I can't have you lifting like that,I can cancel your membership" I told him to go fuck himself and left.

Called him a week later because he charged my account again after I cancelled, he was telling me to calm down ect ect ,then I called him a terrible person he then tells me " yeah well actually I spoke to your coach (gives me the wrong name of the coach) and he doesn't even know you!!" I fucking snapped and called him a inferior Indian cunt. Left a bad review ,he then promptly either paid some pajeets to leave positive reviews (pictured ) or his family members idk what's worse.

Why the fuck are they like this
 

Attachments

  • Messenger_creation_7A75CAF1-91AD-40DE-A3B9-461960BB4322.jpeg
    Messenger_creation_7A75CAF1-91AD-40DE-A3B9-461960BB4322.jpeg
    124.3 KB · Views: 486
  • Messenger_creation_B3099DB1-576B-4B56-BF62-7ED00ECAD61A.jpeg
    Messenger_creation_B3099DB1-576B-4B56-BF62-7ED00ECAD61A.jpeg
    186.5 KB · Views: 479
  • orca-image--59111851.jpeg.jpeg
    orca-image--59111851.jpeg.jpeg
    170.4 KB · Views: 471
Spejmoasic said:
Now I'm a pretty left leaning person , but I fucking hate Indians with a burning passion. I was training at a strongman/powerlifting gym for a couple of weeks , the owner is a pajeet with a fake western name. I was nothing but cordial and respectful to the guy , I even cleaned the shit covered toilets every time I went there. There was a incident where he approached me in the gym to say I'm benching wrong , I politely tell him I have a coach ,then he tells me my coach is shit and doesn't know what he's talking about ( he has multiple world records ) I tell him well I don't think many women let along people are benching 165kgs for reps ,he ended up saying " I can't have you lifting like that,I can cancel your membership" I told him to go fuck himself and left.

Called him a week later because he charged my account again after I cancelled, he was telling me to calm down ect ect ,then I called him a terrible person he then tells me " yeah well actually I spoke to your coach (gives me the wrong name of the coach) and he doesn't even know you!!" I fucking snapped and called him a inferior Indian cunt. Left a bad review ,he then promptly either paid some pajeets to leave positive reviews (pictured ) or his family members idk what's worse.

Why the fuck are they like this
Click to expand...

All businesses pay for reviews, but Indians are by far the most shameless and obvious about it.

You just opened and have 500 five star reviews? Sure.. sure..

Pretty sure even employees do this just to make themselves look better. 10 reviews mentioning Rakesh? Alright.
 
Slap47 said:
All businesses pay for reviews, but Indians are by far the most shameless and obvious about it.

You just opened and have 500 five star reviews? Sure.. sure..

Pretty sure even employees do this just to make themselves look better. 10 reviews mentioning Rakesh? Alright.
Click to expand...
There's alot more to the story,but didn't want to bog down anything. He did lie about his bench press being 200kgs, I asked him what his real name was so I could look it up on open powerlifting. Couldn't give me the name haha. Indian men are so pathetic,and they get so jealous that women are stronger than them
 
llllIllIllIIIIllI said:
The white neighbor looks a little karen-y but I was wrong, she is actually a nice middle aged lady, probably a little libtarded and thinking she's winning social credit points for trying to help the jeeta learn to drive.
Click to expand...
It's Austin, so that's almost certainly the case.

Austin also means they're "skilled" "tech" "workers" here on a H-1B and a H-4. Two Americans lost their jobs to people who can't speak English or drive.
 
Cassandra Says said:
This unicorn state is currently ruled by the LDF (Left Democratic Front), led by none other than The Communist Party of India. Some of Kerala’s success is attributed to the fact it was run as a social democratic welfare economy following independence. They also bring in a lot of remittance which inflates their GDP, but they have a welfare system and pensions - which mean there are fewer people living in abject poverty.

It’s not exactly the kind of Communism that would wake Lenin from his perma-slumber, but flags with the hammer and sickle fly on the streets and of course Modi straight up hates it.
Click to expand...
I'm not saying that a socialist system can't work on a sufficiently small scale, but the old Soviet canard of "they pretend to pay us, and we pretend to work" has and always will inevitably happen if there is ever a lapse in accountability where corruption and oppression are allowed to fester.

People aren't machines that can be adjusted on the fly, and yet this is how the socialist system at its heart wants to treat them; because the system is a part of everything and everything is part of the system, anything the system says is correct--no matter what. Take this quote from 1984 as an example of such thinking in action:

“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday […] it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it. [...] The eyeless crature at the other table swallowed it fanatically. passionately, with a furious desire to track down, denounce, and vaporize anyone who should suggest that last week the ration had been thirty grams. Syme, too-in some more double complex way, involving doublethink-Syme, swallow it. Was he, then, alone in the possession of a memory?”
Click to expand...
 
GluttonousManSlob said:
Hi. I didn't see this term mentioned in the thread, so I wanted to share this all with you. It's about Izzat. Some posts have mentioned 'saving face', which is Izzat, but I wanted to elaborate on it.

Izzat has no direct translation into English. We only have terms that can broach the same concept such as 'honour' or 'reputation' or 'face'. Izzat is so much more than that. It's a zero-sum game of collective honour shared by whole groups of people, all of whom take it very, very seriously. A system like this isn't just foreign to Enlightenment values, but I'd argue it's antithetical to every sensible form of governance on the planet. It will destroy any system that assumes good faith.

Izzat conflicts are not about who is right and who is wrong. It's about who wins and who loses. This means it's a zero-sum game where just about any action is justified (including murder) to restore the lost Izzat. Izzat is a limited social currency and the easiest way to get it is to take it from someone else. Winning is righteous in Izzat. Losing is unrighteous. This means that if someone plays the game of izzat well enough, they can get away with just about anything (murder, rape, scamming, cheating, stealing). The only morality in Izzat is the protection of your group's collective ego. The only appropriate response when your Izzat is attacked is the complete destruction of whoever insulted it.

Two people get into an argument. They might escalate, but chances are it won't be that bad. i.e. 'Sorry I broke your garden gnome.' With two Indians in an argument, the stakes are always deadly thanks to Izzat. Neither of them can back down, nor can they admit fault. Admitting fault is seen as deliberately humiliating yourself. Not only that, but because Izzat is shared, you are shaming everyone who shares your Izzat. So, admitting fault or taking responsibility for a problem is a form of social suicide. This means even if the dispute was over something completely fucking stupid or trivial (like a broken garden gnome), it could spiral into a decades long honour feud.

Izzat is also the reason why police are reluctant to get involved in disputes. Because Izzat is a zero-sum game, all participants are involved in the game. If a policeman sides with one family over another in an Izzat dispute, this means that he's deliberately taking the side of that family and dishonouring the other. This marks him for retribution by the offending party. Without parties being able to be impartial, then centralized authority cannot effectively function.

Let's say someone in India complains about a broken water pipe. Instead of the problem being addressed, the official responsible for the water pipe denies it's a problem and counterattacks him instead, because daring to question his efficacy in his role was challenging his Izzat. So the official destroys the person who brought the problem up. The water pipe never gets fixed.

Izzat is also the reason why Indian managers are so infamous for hiring more Indians. It's because from the manager's perspective, he's using his position to gain an invisible social currency. Merit and actual qualifications come second to that idea. If he hired a westerner, he would not gain or even lose Izzat by doing so. He has a very strong cultural incentive not to be impartial. Meanwhile, if he can strong-arm dozens of Indians into a company, he is gaining huge quantities of Izzat and conspirators who owe an absolute debt to him.

It's not uncommon to see Indians gloat about their success in the west. And yes, izzat is very much a system that enables short term success. But the fundamental reality is the prosperity that these Indians find so attractive in the first place wouldn't exist if the west practiced something similar to Izzat. Our systems can only exist on the assumption of good faith, and not a majority of people exploiting them for destructive short term gain. On top of that, if an Indian causes the systems and companies he comes into contact with to collapse, then he can just go back to India with his plunder. He has no stakes in the long-term prosperity, functionality or stability of these systems. The stakes are completely asymmetrical in the Indian's favour.

You all know about that infamous video of that Indian scamming a food bank. Once again, winning is righteous. Losing is not. By employing 'clever' means (jugaad), he successfully extracted more resources for himself and his family. From the perspective of jugaad, a rule is not something to respect, but merely an obstacle to the Indian's own gain. Since he cheated the system and wasn't caught, he is seen as a righteous and dignified man in the Izzat framework.

I read a story in India about a man offering to pay another man to use a public toilet instead of defecating openly. The latter left and came back with several friends and beat the former to death. The problem was not that he was defecating openly, but that he was criticised for doing so. And with Izzat, it's not an eye-for-an-eye. Izzat is often an eye-for-a-whole-head. Disproportionately and brutally annihilating your enemies is the correct move to make because you take back your lost Izzat and then some. This kind of vindictiveness would be rightly seen as horrifying and disgusting in most of the world.

There was a greentext from 4chan (I don't have it so bear with me). Anon knew an Indian. This Indian would make outlandish claims (he could benchpress 500kg, he was a billionaire, he did arms deals with the US government). Anon said he didn't believe the Indian. The Indian reacted with righteous indignation. The situation escalated to the point where the Indian was emailing Anon death threats. Anon responded by forwarding the emails to the police. The Indian killed himself. Anon was left baffled at the whole situation and had no idea what the fuck just happened.

So, without Izzat, this looks like an utterly insane and pointless sequence of events. But with Izzat? The Indian's actions suddenly make sense. He was boasting to increase his Izzat, and when Anon simply stated his disbelief, it was seen as a vicious attack on his Izzat. The Indian escalated the situation to restore the lost Izzat. When the police got involved, the dispute had become public, so the Indian's shame had increased to unbearable levels. He committed suicide in order to save his remaining Izzat. Anon had no idea what Izzat was, or if he did, he didn't mention it, yet the Indian's actions perfectly align with this framework. This is what makes me believe the green text was genuine.

The western idea of merit is competence in a role. Merit in Izzat is determined by what lengths you will go to to achieve a goal, with competence merely being one path. It often becomes a secondary path, as printing a degree that says you're qualified to be a jet pilot is just as good as being able to actually fly a jet in the eyes of Izzat. In other words, Izzat selects for appearance over authentic merit or morality.

Now, a counterargument an Indian might make is 'Izzat is a dated word' or 'We don't use that word.' I like to compare it to the word vendetta. Vendetta in Italian has a very specific meaning (a familial blood feud where revenge must be taken to restore honour etc). This word would not exist if this didn't reflect a specific facet of Italian life. Izzat is no different. Hell, I've had to write several paragraphs just to explain what the hell Izzat is. Izzat isn't an archaic term either. It's well and truly alive in the modern Indian lexicon.

If izzat were regularly discussed openly, this would be considered one of the greatest possible insults in the Izzat framework. Izzat is why Indians do mass reports, death threats, false flags and various other underhanded tactics when a westerner exposes something they don't want people to see (such as the poop throwing festival). If I knew something like that existed in the west, I would say 'wow that's disgusting, we should stop this'. But in India, the problem is not the point. The point is the problem being exposed and the perceived insult to izzat from exposing the problem. The water pipe never gets fixed.

The one saving grace is Izzat performs awfully in the long term. Once Indians displace you, they will go back to playing this insane game among themselves. It's what happened to companies that got hit by Izzat. This is also why there aren't any homegrown Indian companies that have the same influence as Microsoft or Google. Whenever they start getting ahead, their companies implode from infighting, nobody doing their jobs, everybody trying to cheat each other and nobody addressing critical issues. Systems that delegate authority and work on good faith eventually win out over zero-sum honour feuding. Izzat cannot maintain complex systems because its players are only concerned with short term gain.

With the west, the issue is that it often fails to live up to its own ideals. It's not a perfect system, but we can course correct and address problems pragmatically. With Izzat, Indians live up to those ideals very, very often. When you see the dysfunctionality of India, remember that it's a feature of Izzat, not a bug.

Jugaad as a term also warrants more explanation, but my post is long enough as it is.
Click to expand...
The Internet in a nutshell.:cunningpepe:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom