- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
If they remain Hindus, it's eternal. I know some Catholic, Anglo-Indians. They're ok. They despise Hindus.Any opinions on how many generations of breeding out in foreign countries it would take to dilute the basic jeet evil?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they remain Hindus, it's eternal. I know some Catholic, Anglo-Indians. They're ok. They despise Hindus.Any opinions on how many generations of breeding out in foreign countries it would take to dilute the basic jeet evil?
There's plenty of genetic overlap in the Mediterranean, Ahmed from Casablanca is probably a cousin of Juan from Cadiz several times removed because of the Muslim rule over Iberia, same can be said to a lesser extent about Southern Italy and Sicily specifically. Geography is a big point like you said, disregarding the geopolitical circumstances that led to the discovery of the New World, there's a reason it was the Spaniards and Portugese who had the tip of Europe all to themselves whilst being protected by the Pyrnnes that made the first leap into the new world and not the Morrocans who were busy trying to unite the Atlas mountains whilst fighting off Berbers and competing Emirs in Algeria.I have a hard time chalking anything and everything up to genetics, much less IQ specifically (as if intelligence gives character), when the star of ethnic groups rises and falls so much. Germanics were barbarian trash when Middle Easterners were inventing civilization, suddenly uplifted when they Christianized, and then uplifted again when they Reformed. The Orient has been up then down and then up again. Sometimes cultures have totally reworked themselves overnight (Japan, Cherokees).
The worst part is, its these types who are trying to force a cultural change by making it so you force their propaganda outside of your workplace by making your workplace follow their Tumblr logic. These BRIDGE meetings are always staffed by many flavors of AWFL and emasculated men.they are too corpo-fucked and have HR looking over their shoulder so they can't "just ban india".
VeryView attachment 7833067
View attachment 7833069
https://youtube.com/watch?v=bq0HeSP_U68
One Indian man has decided to fix India.
Yeah the British tried and they were a whole empire. What's this little shit think he's going to do, instill virtue and civilization into his fellow pajeets?Verybut unfeasible. Trying to imprint civil values onto a people and foster a high trust society is something that requires either a concerted effort over a generation or two targeting the youth by a centralized state (Either through public initiative or implanting said values into the educational curriculum), but with a huge bureaucracy like India that's not happening, or a coordinated mass movement of concerned citizens, but they're a drop in the bucket in a country as big as India.
He’s probably setting up a scam of some kind.Yeah the British tried and they were a whole empire. What's this little shit think he's going to do, instill virtue and civilization into his fellow pajeets?
Their intellect is so low that they don't understand consequences of their actions nor do they comprehend shame, remorse, or reflection of their actions.indians don’t even understand what their killer truck drivers are charged with. They claim that he needs to be let go because he didn’t mean to kill anyone, but vehicular homicide doesn’t require intent. Vehicular homicide is gross negligence or recklessness that results in the death of other people. Vehicular manslaughter is when somebody causes the death of other people through (non-gross) negligence. Really the only argument they can make is that cutting across two highway lanes of traffic to make an illegal u-turn without even checking for other drivers isn’t that negligent (it’s incredibly negligent) and it’s not that reckless (when blindly cutting across a highway is obviously very reckless) so he should receive clemency (when he should be punished to the maximum possible degree). Furthermore, the trucking company, agency that licensed him, and the state of California should also be held liable for these deaths. Maybe we need to get rid of indians seeing as they obviously feel that killing three people is just something that happens on a daily commute.
But saar you cannot be arresting him when he did not mean to do it! Kindly reduce the punishindians don’t even understand what their killer truck drivers are charged with. They claim that he needs to be let go because he didn’t mean to kill anyone, but vehicular homicide doesn’t require intent. Vehicular homicide is gross negligence or recklessness that results in the death of other people. Vehicular manslaughter is when somebody causes the death of other people through (non-gross) negligence. Really the only argument they can make is that cutting across two highway lanes of traffic to make an illegal u-turn without even checking for other drivers isn’t that negligent (it’s incredibly negligent) and it’s not that reckless (when blindly cutting across a highway is obviously very reckless) so he should receive clemency (when he should be punished to the maximum possible degree). Furthermore, the trucking company, agency that licensed him, and the state of California should also be held liable for these deaths. Maybe we need to get rid of indians seeing as they obviously feel that killing three people is just something that happens on a daily commute.
If you possess a CDL you are held to a higher standard as you are a licensed professional. Manslaughter is possible if you stole a truck you didn't know how to drive and caused an accident.indians don’t even understand what their killer truck drivers are charged with. They claim that he needs to be let go because he didn’t mean to kill anyone, but vehicular homicide doesn’t require intent. Vehicular homicide is gross negligence or recklessness that results in the death of other people. Vehicular manslaughter is when somebody causes the death of other people through (non-gross) negligence. Really the only argument they can make is that cutting across two highway lanes of traffic to make an illegal u-turn without even checking for other drivers isn’t that negligent (it’s incredibly negligent) and it’s not that reckless (when blindly cutting across a highway is obviously very reckless) so he should receive clemency (when he should be punished to the maximum possible degree). Furthermore, the trucking company, agency that licensed him, and the state of California should also be held liable for these deaths. Maybe we need to get rid of indians seeing as they obviously feel that killing three people is just something that happens on a daily commute.
For a little while, there were over 400 engineering job openings at walmart:View attachment 7833432
They Even Pajeet'ed Wally World! LMAO EVEN!
"In India, a person is killed on the roads approximately every three minutes, with official data from 2023 indicating over 172,000 fatalities. This amounts to about 474 deaths daily."they obviously feel that killing three people is just something that happens on a daily commute.