Spain: Moroccan and general north African migration (also subsaharan migration through north Africa). They have an exclave called Cueta which is in Morocco. So all the migrants have to do is charge the fences, and apply for refugee status if they get in. Then they get the right of a trail, so they get shipped to the Spanish mainland and abuse the system until they either get a ticket, or disappear as an illegal alien. Morocco doesn't care and often uses this as a weapon, give us money or we let another group of migrants charge you. Alternatively, migrants use boats to go to the Canary islands. While they're quite far away, the west sahara is neutral territory so it is almost impossible to patrol and police.
Portugal: No idea.
France: Historically they took a lot of migrants from Algeria. They wanted to keep it as their empire was collapsing post WW2. So instead of marking it as a colony, they incorperated it as a province. This gave many Algerians the chance to move. They have a massive muslim population they don;t know how to handle. France has a very strong "religion is a personal thing you keep inside your home" which of course clashes with hijabs and muslims wanting to force their shit on everyone. Paris has neighbourhoods the police won't patrol.
Le Pen (senior) had a quite hard core party, but his daughter managed to cleanse it of most of the radical elements and is dangerously close to winning. Last time Macron had to tell his voters to vote on left wing parties (he's center right) to win in the districts away from le Pen. Then the victorious left wing parties twisted Macron's balls 2 seconds later.
Belgium: No idea how they got them. But bruxelles has neighbourhoods that are fully muslimified. The French and Dutch sides are too busy REEEing at eachother to save their country.
Netherlands: Has some migrant populations from their ex-colonies suriname and east indies. But the big problem are the Moroccans and Turks. Both were invited over as cheap labor, with the expectation they would leave after a few years. They stayed, chain migrated their family over, and now cause issues in the cities. Wilders tried to get them out, but civil rights prevents you from kicking a guy out before he had his 5 court cases + endless appeals, and the dutch system has coalitions so any big party has to cooperate and weaken its demands.
Germany: Has Turks as cheap labor after WW2. They also stayed. Wir schaffen das invited over a tidal wave of migrants looking for free gibs. AfD tries to remove them, but Germans are too cucked by their past to vote for survival.
Poland: not really hot for migrants, but belarus pushed a bunch of migrants over the border as a weapon. The Poles have a simple solution though, just give them a train ticket to Germany and they're happy to leave for greener pastures.
Austria: no idea, probably like Germany
Balkans: They mostly push migrants to the north-west, neither migrant nor country wants to be there.
Italy: They own some islands in the med, like lampadusa. This is close to the north african coast, so a classic target of migrant boats. For years it has been overflowing, but Italy was told to shut up and ignore the problem. When the migrant flow swelled in '12, people got sick of it and Germany could no longer ignore migrants, as Italy started to let them move to Germany. Melony tries to deal with migrants, but Italy is a net receiver of EU aid, so Germany can tell them to suck the migrant dick, or the EU money will stop flowing. This is stupid, but it makes elites feel better about themselves.
UK: For a while commonwealth countries could freely migrate between eachother. So UK got a bunch of indians and pakis. Now, family members that moved to europe try to get to the UK to get with their family and drain social services as a family. France is happy to let them go, while UK doesn't want them. Migrants try to slip into trucks to get shipped over.
Denmark: The labor party was losing hard, the harder they sucked the migrant cock, the worse it got. At some point the leadership realized the working class hated migrants, and their wages were getting destroyed by migrants providing cheap labor, so they went anti migrant. Now they're against migrants. They take their valuables when they get processed, and if they get kicked out, they keep the valuables to cover the processing fee. The result is that migrants tell eachother to avoid Denmark and instead try other places. They're also rich enough to tell the EU to suck it.
Sweden: Heckin' wholesome neutral country that loved migrants. Pretty much everyone that applied, got a permit to stay. At some point Malmo became the rape capital of the world. The average Swede tries to tell his government to cage the rapeapes, but that would be heckin' unwholesome so the elites just refuse to do so.
Norway: no idea.
Finland: no idea.
US discussions on minorities are very different. We don't have many niggers or east asians. Our muslims and arabs are not the few elites that manage to land a spot in america, but the stupidest, tribal retards they imported for cheap labor, and were set loose in the streets once they were of no more use. Overal, the biggest problem groups are north africans and middle eastern muslims.
Jeets are a recent problem, as tech retards and university retards import them as cheap labor. We don't have a silicon valley or canadian government that decided to import a few million of them overnight. So the average European doesn't get forcefully jeetpilled by a pack of rapist jeets. Mostly techies and adjacent slowly get jeetpilled. Same with niggers. Only recently we started getting sub-saharan africans. Right now only asylum ministries realize just how low IQ they are. Pretty much every single one of them is in a special needs track to get them in a government subsidized workplace.
DWARF vs. 
EMPLOYEES in the 7/11