Re Hindu rape culture, this gem from Twitter:
> even the gods couldn't control their desire to rape, think about it, can the rape urge be quenched even? Never.
squamish321 - 1832104003595022717.mp4
The apologists in the replies are equally ridiculous, stating that it is misinterpreted or out of context, that the point is that lust can't be controlled it can only be punished.
The clip and their replies explains the culture there, and the retort of covering the women to prevent this "insatiable and uncontrollable urge".
They have no comprehension that our impulses, thoughts, ideas, goals, values, emotions, and actions are all things under the dominion and responsibility of ourself, not another, be it another god or human. That is the divine that separates us as human from animal. There is no duty to self-composure. It's reactionary entitlements.
Western men don't rape en mass as western men don't excuse such an impulse/intuition. We recognise we have self control and have directed ourselves to not have such an urge in the first place, by not feeding its early saplings so that an action/desire/urge does not fruit. Women can feel safe in the west and around western men because of this. It's also not to say lust is not felt, but its expression is not self-entitled abusive rape, but is instead an appreciation and respect for an individual and recognising that your impression of her is yours alone, and that you two have to actually form a relationship first before transmuting idea into sustainable action.
If such self-governance is new to you, study the works of James Allen.