I feel he completely won that round against me.
He debunked that the pipes are water pipes.
He did miss that Mattogno concluded that these are hot water pipes for a real shower room, but everyone makes mistakes.
The pipes originate from the boiler room and go to the ceiling of the Brausebad, could be anything.
He didn't really do anything, he can't win any argument because he can never make an argument without being wishy washy about what he's saying, because he's a moron.
You still haven't presented where he says that, as I did with the passage I found. I didn't read the book but it makes sense he would make that argument since his theory is that the "gas chamber" was really a shower, so air ventilation doesn't really fit.
You could just read what you source and fine it there. Oh wait that takes more effort than searching "gas chamber". You said you would read it, why are you lying now?
What he doesn't do, this I am 100% positive of, is make the argument that the pipes were fake ("begin and end at the wall) and planted there to scare visiting dignitaries. Even if we accept Mattogno's theory about the pipes, it still contradicts your own view of the pipes being fake.
How do you know what he says and what his argument is, you refuse to read it after you said you would. Funny thing is the pipes can be real and fake at the same time.
So "in some death camps, gas chambers were disguised as shower rooms", but there were also holes in the walls/ceiling from which pellets were dropped in? That does seem a little needlessly complex. It would be (nice is the wrong word, but) nice to know which camps had these "disguised" gas chambers.
They all claim to have gas chambers, remember they said Dachau had a gas chamber except they never used it. So they went to all the trouble of building a fake shower gas chamber to then never use it. Make it make sense.
As far as I'm aware at the major death camps (where people were killed in assembly line fashion more or less) it was always under the pretense of shower. There were other places where limited gassings occurred where no such pretense was given. An example of this would be at Stutthof.
Your killing in an assembly line fashion at Dachau was around 50 people out of over 10,000. Those evil Nazis, killing a fraction of a percentage on purpose, a real genocide.
You have no idea how correct you are. I got into an argument with him about something in the book of Obidiah, proved him wrong by showing him a majority opinion in the Talmud that exactly answered his question. What this nigga does is reject that as not a real opinion, takes my words out of context, claims he "won" the argument, and follows me around for months on the forum trying to gloat how he beat me. You literally can't win, if you prove something definitively he will just reject the evidence.
Lmao, when are you goin to respond to my post 5 pages back at this point. Funny how you scurry back to your sewer lair when you find yourself against something you can't whinge your way out of.
As Sartre writes in Anti Semite and Jew
Of course you'd quote a pedophile who looks like this:
Probably reminds you of every Rabbi you've ever talked to, being as dysgenic as jews are.
Well do you still think the pipes are fake?
I had quoted Mattogno seemingly agreeing with the mainstream view. I myself am no pipe expert so based on appearance alone I can't determine, but they do look a lot like how other air vent pipes do.
They are fake. You don't know what you quoted since you never read it.
LMAO you are still seething so hard about me quoting you.
He's always seething being an Orthodox jew who loves the company of baby dick sucking Rabbis.
Not interested in talking with someone who lies and takes stuff out of context as you continually do and just did. Just pointing out to chugger how no one can win in an argument against you because you refuse to acknowledge any evidence that disagrees with you. Avodah Zara 10B buck broke you.
You've never told the truth in your life. Your religion and culture is built entirely on lies and obfusication.
As I said I am no pipe expert and I don't really care. What I care about is your claim that they are fake pipes and were put there to scare people or elicit an emotional response. Are you backing off this claim?
He doesn't care, guys, he's just correct! So why did they put fake pipes there or real pipes? What's your actual argument?
No point in hitting my head against a brick wall but I wanted to show chugger how disingenuous you were. You showed it perfectly, thank you.
Hey look the coward wants to run away again. Imagine that.
I can only say what I think is most probable since I'm operating without all the information I need and don't have expertise about HVAC systems.
You could read your source, it'll give you more than enough info. We know you have no practical knowledge, you have a barely working grasp on reality. How jewish of you.
I don't think they planned on dropping Zkylon B pellets on the floor. It seems most logical to me that the pellets were in a bin of some sort that slid down, came to rest at the grates, they off-gassed and then the bin was retrieved.
Why would the mechanism to do that be outside the building opposite all those pipe controls? Why wouldn't they be next to the pipe controls?
I believe the drains were closed up after the war, probably for sanitary reasons. Maybe you're going to argue that they did it to conceal they were actually real drains?
What's unsanitary about a drain? Do you have any knowledge of plumbing at all?
Assuming it was a "fake gas chamber" putting seemingly authentic sealed drains is senseless since these would have no purpose whatsoever (because the victims would immediately see they were fake).
So they can identify fake showerheads but not fake drains? Or are both obviously fake?
I think everyone here can I see I'm trying to answer you in good faith but you're a persnickety bastard about these questions which have limited or no relevancy to your overall point (the Dachau "gas chamber" is self-evidently a post war construction designed to deceive people).
You've never answered anything in good faith, all you do is dodge, lie, misquote, obfuscate, etc. If we ask you a yes or no question we get 2 paragraphs on an entirely different subject. Your response has no relevancy to the topic yet again, you are just complaining about being forced to answer questions directly as you have always done(because they reveal that you have no idea what you are talking about and are a holocaust denier).